Effect of different mix compositions on apparent carbon dioxide (CO2) permeability of geopolymer: Suitability as well cement for CO2 sequestration wells

Applied Energy

Volumn 114, Issue , 2014, Pages 939-948

  Nasvi, M C M ^a   Ranjith, P G ^a   Sanjayan, J ^b  

^a Deep Earth Energy Lab   (Australia)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Apparent permeability; Fly ash; Geopolymer; Well cement; Zonal isolation

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CEMENTS; FLY ASH; GAS INDUSTRY; GEOPOLYMERS; INORGANIC POLYMERS; OIL FIELD EQUIPMENT; OIL WELLS; SLAGS; WELL CEMENTING;

ALKALI ACTIVATED SLAGS; APPARENT PERMEABILITIES; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; GEOPOLYMER; GEOPOLYMER MATERIALS; OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY; ORDINARY PORTLAND CEMENT; ZONAL ISOLATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ACTIVATED CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CEMENT; FLY ASH; PERMEABILITY; POLYMER; PRIMARY SECTOR INDUSTRY; SLAG; WELL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84888854502     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.050     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Herzog H., Golomb D. Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuel use. Encyclopedia Energy 2004, 1:1-11.
2. Sanna A., Dri M., Hall M.R., Maroto-Valer M. Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) - a UK perspective. Appl Energy 2012, 99:545-554.
3. 2 greenhouse gas emissions. Sci Total Environ 1999, 228:121-133.
4. 2 in deep saline aquifers. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:240a-245a.
5. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:4467-4475.
6. 2 emissions of coal-fired power plants. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3917-3929.
7. 2. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3557-3566.
8. 2 capture and storage-part 1. Appl Energy 2009, 86:781-792.
9. e NGCC electric power generation hub for offshore operations: presenting the sevan gtw concept. Appl Energy 2009, 86:2298-2307.
10. 2 capture in Huaneng Beijing coal-fired power station. Appl Energy 2010, 87:3347-3354.
11. White C.M., Smith D.H., Jones K.L., Goodman A.L., Jikich S.A., Lacount R.B., et al. Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery a review. Energy Fuels 2005, 19:659-724.
12. 2 enhanced coalbed methane production in the netherlands. Energy 2002, 27:647-674.
13. 2 geological storage-classification of storage options. Oil Gas Sci Technol 2005, 60:513-515.
14. 2 sequestration in the teapot Dome EOR pilot: geomechanical site characterization. Environ Geol 2008, 54:1667-1675.
15. 2-brine flow along the casing-cement microannulus. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:272.
16. Nasvi M.C.M., Ranjith P.G., Sanjayan J. The permeability of geopolymer under down-hole stress conditions: application for carbon dioxide sequestration wells. Appl Energy 2012, 102:1391-1398.
17. 2-brine flow along the casing-cement microannulus. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:3609-3615.
18. Newell D.L., Carey J.W. Experimental evaluation of wellbore integrity along the cement-rock boundary. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 47:276-282.
19. 2 geological storage conditions. Cem Concr Res 2012, 42:8-19.
20. Nygaard R. Wabamun area CO2 sequestration project (wasp). Energy and environmental systems group (EES) 2010, Project cost estimate, University of Calgary.
21. Barlet-Gouédard V. Well technologies for co-geological storage: co-resistant cement. Oil and gas science and technology Revue de L'institut Francais du Petrole 2007, 62:325.
22. Duguid A, Radonjic M, Bruant R, Mandecki T, Scherer G, Celia, M. The effect of carbon dioxide sequestration on oil well cements. Department of Civil Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton; 2009.
23. Duguid A. Degradation of oilwell cement due to exposure to carbonated brine. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:546-560.
24. Neuville N., Lecolier E., Aouad G., Rivereau A., Damidot D. Effect of curing conditions on oil well cement paste behavior during leaching: experimental and modelling approaches. C R Chim 2009, 12:511-520.
25. 2-rich fluids. Cem Concr Res 2008, 38:1038-1048.
26. 2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: a technical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:6220-6238.
27. Davidovits J. Properties of geopolymer cements. In: International conference on alkaline cements and concretes. Ukraine; 1994. p. 131-49.
28. Diaz E., Allouche E. Recycling of fly ash into geopolymer concrete: creation of a database 2010, IEEE, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, USA.
29. Majidi B. Geopolymer technology, from fundamentals to advanced applications: a review. Mater Technol: Adv Perform Mater 2009, 24:79-87.
30. Van Jaarsveld J., Van Deventer J., Lorenzen L. The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: Part I. Theory and applications. Miner Eng 1997, 10:659-669.
31. Nicholson C., Fletcher R., Miller N., Stirling C., Morris J., Hodges S., et al. Building innovation through geopolymer technology. Chem NZ 2005, 69:10-12.
32. Davidovits J. Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. In: Geopolymere '99 international conference. Saint-Quentin, France; 30th June-2nd July, 1999. p. 9-39.
33. Davidovits J. Environmentally driven geopolymer applications. In: Geopolymer 2002 conference. Melbourne, Australia; 2002.
34. Duxson P., Provis J.L., Lukey G.C., Van Deventer J.S.J. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of 'green concrete'. Cem Concr Res 2007, 37:1590-1597.
35. Lloyd N, Rangan B. Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In: Second international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies. Ancona, Italy; June, 2010.
36. Mclellan B.C., Williams R.P., Lay J., Van Riessen A., Corder G.D. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. J Cleaner Prod 2011, 19:1080-1090.
37. Barlet-Gouedard V, Zusatz-Ayache B, Porcherie O. Geopolymer composition and application for carbon dioxide storage 2010;US 7846250B2:11/462, 731.
38. Bachu S., Stewart S. Geological sequestration of anthropogenic carbon dioxide in the western Canada sedimentary basin: suitability analysis. J Can Pet Technol 2002, 41.
39. Perera M.S.A., Ranjith P.G., Choi S., Airey D. The effects of sub-critical and super-critical carbon dioxide adsorption-induced coal matrix swelling on the permeability of naturally fractured black coal. Energy 2011, 36:6442-6450.
40. Yip C., Lukey G., Van deventer J. The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cem Concr Res 2005, 35:1688-1697.
41. Bakharev T., Sanjayan J., Cheng Y.B. Resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete to acid attack. Cem Concr Res 2003, 33:1607-1611.
42. Fernández-jiménez A., Palomo J., Puertas F. Alkali-activated slag mortars: mechanical strength behaviour. Cem Concr Res 1999, 29:1313-1321.
43. Habert G., D'espinose de Lcaillerie J., Roussel N. An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J Cleaner Prod 2011, 19:1229-1238.
44. Rangan BV, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ. Studies on fly ash based geopolymer concrete. PhD thesis, Curtin university of technology; 2005.
45. Bakharev T., Sanjayan J., Cheng Y.B. Effect of elevated temperature curing on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Res 1999, 29:1619-1625.
46. Bakharev T., Sanjayan J., Cheng Y.B. Effect of admixtures on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Res 2000, 30:1367-1374.
47. Collins F., Sanjayan J. Early age strength and workability of slag pastes activated by sodium silicates. Mag Concr Res 2001, 53:321-326.
48. Li Z., Liu S. Influence of slag as additive on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer. J Mater Civ Eng 2007, 19:470-474.
49. 2 under geologic sequestration conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41:4787-4792.
50. 2 exposure from the SACROC unit, West Texas, USA. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:75.
51. 2 producer. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:186.
52. 2. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:3553-3560.
53. 2 on multiaxial mechanical and hydraulic behaviours of an oilwell cement. J Mater Civ Eng 2010, 23:741-746.
54. 2 experimental tests of well cement. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:3367-3374.
55. Siriwardane H., Haljasmaa I., Mclendon R., Irdi G., Soong Y., Bromhal G. Influence of carbon dioxide on coal permeability determined by pressure transient methods. Int J Coal Geol 2009, 77:109-118.
56. Ranjith P.G., Perera M.S.A. A new triaxial apparatus to study the mechanical and fluid flow aspects of carbon dioxide sequestration in geological formations. Fuel 2011, 90:2751-2759.
57. Kong D.L.Y., Sanjayan J.G. Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar on concrete. Cem Concr Res 2010, 40:334-339.
58. Dutta D., Thokchom S., Ghosh P., Ghosh S. Effect of silica fume additions on porosity of fly ash geopolymers. J Eng Appl Sci 2010, 5:74-79.
59. Diamond S. Mercury porosimetry: an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res 2000, 30:1517-1525.
60. Banthia N., Mindess S. Water permeability of cement paste. Cem Concr Res 1989, 19:727-736.
61. Thomas J.J., Jennings H.M., Allen A.J. The surface area of hardened cement paste as measured by various techniques. Concr Sci Eng 1999, 1:45-64.
62. Sathia R, Babu K, Santhanam M. Durability study of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete 2005. In: The 3rd ACF international conference-ACF/VCA; 2008. p. 1153-9.
63. Van den heede P., Gruyaert E., De belie N. Transport properties of high-volume fly ash concrete: capillary water sorption, water sorption under vacuum and gas permeability. Cem Concr Compos 2010, 32:749-756.
64. Perera M.S.A., Ranjith P.G., Airey D., Choi S. Sub-and super-critical carbon dioxide flow behavior in naturally fractured black coal: an experimental study. Fuel 2011, 90:3390-3397.
65. Jasinge D., Ranjith P., Choi S. Effects of effective stress changes on permeability of Latrobe valley brown coal. Fuel 2011, 90:1292-1300.
66. Picandet V., Khelidj A., Bellegou H. Crack effects on gas and water permeability of concretes. Cem Concr Res 2009, 39:537-547.
67. Noman R., Kalam M.Z. Transition from laminar to non-darcy flow of gases in porous media. Adv Core Eval: Accur Precision Reserves Estimation 1990, 447-462.
68. Somerton W.H., Dudley R. Effect of stress on permeability of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 1975, 12:129-145.
69. Bamforth P. The relationship between permeability coefficients for concrete obtained using liquid and gas. Mag Concr Res 1987, 39:3-11.
70. Lemmon EW, Huber ML, Mclinden MO. Nist reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties-REFPROP 2000, Version 7, NIST standard reference, database 23.
71. Tanikawa W., Shimamoto T. Klinkenberg effect for gas permeability and its comparison to water permeability for porous sedimentary rocks. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 2006, 3:1315-1338.
72. Klinkenberg L. The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases. Drilling Prod Practice 1941, 200-213.
73. 2 in geological media in response to climate change. Environ Geol 2003, 44:277-289.
74. 2 storage conditions: static and dynamic laboratory experiments. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:5251-5258.
75. Preben R, Karen V, Ali T, Idar A, Inge M. Ensuring well integrity in connection with CO2 injection. Sintef petroleum research, Report No-31.6920.00/02/07; 2007.
76. Hardjito D., Wallah S., Sumajouw D., Rangan B. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Aust J Struct Eng 2005, 6:77-84.
77. Sindhunata J., Van deventer J., Lukey G., Xu H. Effect of curing temperature and silicate concentration on fly-ash-based geopolymerization. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006, 45:3559-3568.