Global versus local narratives of REDD: A case study from Peru's Amazon

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 35, Issue , 2014, Pages 98-108

  Evans, Kristen ^a   Murphy, Laura ^a   De Jong, Wil ^b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Amazon; Communities; Future scenarios; Global forest governance; Participatory methods; REDD; Tropical forests

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARBON CYCLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECENTRALIZATION; DEFORESTATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LOGGING; NARRATIVE; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; PERU; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIVER BASIN; RURAL POPULATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84888831691     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AIDESEP Analisis y propuestas indigenas sobre el RPP (3a version) del REDD Peru (accessed 28.11.12). http://www.redd-monitor.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Analisis-AIDESEP-sobre-RPP3-Per%C3%BA-21.2.2011.pdf.
2. Realising REDD+: National Strategies and Policy Options 2009, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
3. Armas A., Börner J., Tito M., Díaz L., Tapia-Coral S.C., Wunder S., Reymond L., Nascimento N. Pagos por servicios ambientales para la conservación de bosques en la Amazonía peruana: Un análisis de viabilidad 2009, SERNANP, Lima, Perú, 92 pp.
4. Arnouts, R., 2010. Regional nature governance in the Netherlands; four decades of governance modes and shifts in the Utrechtse Heuvelrug and Midden-Brabant. Dissertation. Wageningen University, Netherlands.
5. Brewer G.D. Inventing the future: scenarios, imagination, mastery and control. Sustainability Science 2007, 2:159-177.
6. Cano W. Formal Institutions, Local Arrangements and Conflicts in the Northern Bolvia Communities after Forest Governance Reforms 2012, PROMAB Scientific Series, Wageningen, Netherlands.
7. CATIE, 2007. Estado actual de los bosques de producción en cuatro paises amazónicos. Revista Recursos Naturales y Ambiente No. 49-50. CATIE, San Jose, Costa Rica.
8. de Jong W., Borner J., Pacheco P., Pokorny B., Sabogal C., Benneker C., Cano W., Cornejo C., Evans K., Ruiz S., Zenteno M. Amazon forests at the crossroads: pressures, responses, and challenges. Future of Forests - Responding to Global Changes 2010, 283-298. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria. R. Alfaro, M. Kanninen, M. Lobovikov, G. Mery, B. Swallow, J. Varjo (Eds.).
9. Swidden-Fallow Agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon. Advances in Economic Botany 1987, vol. 5. Botanical Garden, New York.
10. El Peruano Empresa Peruana de Servicios Editoriales 2011, S.A. Lima, Peru, (accessed 07.12.12). http://www.elperuano.pe/Edicion/.
11. Evans K. Report of REDD Fieldwork June 2010, IBC, Iquitos, Peru.
12. Evans K., Velarde S.J., Prieto R.P., Rao S.N., Sertzen S., Davila K., Cronkleton P., de Jong W. Field guide to the future: four ways for communities to think ahead. CIFOR, ASB system-wide program of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research 2006, ICRAF, Secretariat of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Nairobi, Kenya.
13. Evans K., de Jong W., Cronkleton P. Future scenarios as a tool for collaboration in forest communities. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 2008, 1:97-103.
14. Evans K., de Jong W., Cronkleton P. Participatory methods for planning the future in forest communities. Society and Natural Resources 2010, 23:1-16.
15. FAO State of the World's Forests 2011 2011, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
16. FCPF, 2010. Global dialogues on R-PP preparation. Presentation on August 13-14 2009 at Grupo-REDD Peru. World Bank, Washington DC, USA.
17. Glück B., Angelsen A., Appelstrand M., Assembe-Mvondo S., Auld G., Hogl K. Core components of the international forest regime complex. Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance. A Global Assessment Report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime. IUFRO World Series 2010, vol. 28. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria.
18. Greenspirit. 2011. Web site. Accessed 31-March-2011. http://www.greenspirit.com/.
19. Hajer M.A., Versteeg W. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2005, 7(3):175-184.
20. Hiraldo R., Tanner T. The Global Political Economy of REDD+: Engaging Social Dimensions in the Emerging Green Economy 2011, UNRISD Publications No. 4, (accessed 07.12.12). http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(LookupAllDocumentsByUNID)/B0B96C3130210583C12579760057FA24?OpenDocument.
21. IBC Instituto Bien Comun 2010, (accessed 10.05.10). http://www.ibcperu.org/.
22. IPCC Climate Change 2007, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007, International Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
23. Leach M., Scoones I., Stirling A. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology Environment, Social Justice 2010, Earthscan, London, UK.
24. Lovera S. The Hottest REDD Issues: Rights, Equity, Development, Deforestation and Governance by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Briefing Note, IUCN 2008, (accessed 07.12.12). http://www.rightsandresources.org/publication_details.php?publicationID=904.
25. Lynam T., de Jong W., Sheil D., Kusumanto T., Evans K. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art5/.
26. MINAM Ley que regula la compensación de los servicios ambientales 2011, Ministerio del Ambiente, Lima, Peru.
27. Murdiyarso D., Brockhaus M., Sunderlin W.D., Verchot L. Some lessons learned from the first generation of REDD+ activities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4(6):678-685.
28. Peskett L., Huberman D., Bowen-Jones E., Edwards G., Brown J. Making REDD Work for the Poor. Prepared for the Poverty Environment Partnership 2008, (accessed 07.12.12). http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/making_redd_work_for_the_poor_final_draft_0110.pdf.
29. Peterson G.D., Cumming G.S., Carpenter S.R. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Ecology 2003, 17:358-366.
30. Peterson G.D., Beard T.D., Beisner B.E., Bennett E.M., Carpenter S.R., Cumming G.S., Dent C.L., Havlicek T.D. Assessing future ecosystem services: a case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conservation Ecology 2003, 7(3). http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art1/.
31. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (PFII) The Copenhagen Results on the UNFCCC; Implications for Indigenous Peoples' Local Adaptation and Mitigation Measures 2010, (accessed 07.12.12). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/E.C.19.2010.18%20EN.pdf.
32. Pokorny, B., Scholz, I., de Jong, W., forthcoming. REDD+ for the poor or the poor for REDD+? About the limitations of environmental policies in the Amazon and the potential of achieving environmental goals through pro poor policies.
33. Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community 2000, Simon & Schuster, New York City, USA.
34. Skutsch M., McCall M.K. Why community forest monitoring?. Community Forest Monitoring for the Carbon Market: Opportunities under REDD 2011, Earthscan, London, UK.
35. Stern N. Economics of Climate Change 2006, Office of the Exchequer, London, UK.
36. Sunderlin W., Angelsen A., Belcher B., Burgers P., Nasi R., Wunder W. Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development 2005, 33(9):1383-1402.
37. UN-REDD United Nations REDD Programme 2011, (accessed 03.04.11). http://www.un-redd.org/.
38. van der Heijden K. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation 1996, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
39. White A., Martin A. Who Owns the World's Forests? 2002, Forest Trends, Washington, DC, USA.
40. Wollenberg E., Springate-Baginski O. Incentives+How Can REDD Improve Well-being in Forest Communities?. InfoBrief No. 21 December 2009, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
41. Wollenberg E., Edmunds D., Buck L. Anticipating Change: Scenarios as a Tool for Adaptive Forest Management 2000, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
42. Wunder S. Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation?. Realising REDD+: National Strategies and Policy Options 2009, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. A. Angelsen (Ed.).