A generic library of problem solving methods for scheduling applications

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 113-120

  Rajpathak, Dnyanesh ^a   Motta, Enrico ^a   Zdrahal, Zdenek ^a   Roy, Rajkumar ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

And Knowledge reuse; Knowledge acquisition; Ontologies; Problem solving methods; Scheduling

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; ONTOLOGY; SCHEDULING;

BENCHMARK APPLICATIONS; DOMAIN INDEPENDENTS; KNOWLEDGE REUSE; PROBLEM SOLVING METHODS; SCHEDULING APPLICATION; SCHEDULING PROBLEM; SCHEDULING TECHNIQUES; STRUCTURED APPROACH;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84888802438     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/945645.945663     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Benjamins, V. R., Problem solving Methods for Diagnosis, PhD Thesis, Department of Social Science Informatics, University of Amsterdam. (1993).
2. Beck, J. C. and Fox, M. S., Constraint-directed techniques for scheduling alternative activities, Artificial Intelligence, 121(1-2): 211-250, August (2000).
3. Chandrasekaran, B., Design problem solving: A Task Analysis, AI Magazine 11(4): 59-71, (1990).
4. Dechter, R., et al. Temporal constraint networks, Artificial Intelligence, 49 (1-3): 61-95, (1991).
5. Garey, M. R., Johnson, D. S., Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NPCompleteness. Freeman, New York, (1979).
6. Haralick, R. M. and Elliott. G. L., Increasing Tree Search Efficiency for Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Artificial Intelligence, 14: 263-313, (1980).
7. Hori, M. and Yoshida. T., Domain-oriented library of scheduling methods: design principle and real-life application, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49: 601-626, (1998).
8. Le Pape, C., Implementation of Resource Constraints in ILOG SCHDEULE: A library for the development of Constraint-Based Scheduling Systems, Intelligent Systems Engineering, 3(2): 55-66, (1994).
9. Marcus, S., Automatic Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems. Kluwer Academic, (1988).
10. Motta, E., Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling: Principles and Case Studies in Parametric Design. IOS Press, Amsterdam, (1999).
11. Motta, E., et al. The Epistemology of Scheduling Problems, In Proceedings of fifteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'02), pages 215-219, Lyon, France, (2002).
12. Newel, A. and Simon, H., Computer science as empirical enquiry: Symbols and search, Communications of the ACM, 19(3):113-126, (1976).
13. Prosser, P. and Buchanan, I., Intelligent scheduling: past, present and future. Intelligent Systems Engineering, 3(2):67-78, (1994).
14. Poeck, K. and Puppe, F., Making role limiting shells more flexible. Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems, In Proceedings of the seventh EKAW, Aussenac, N. et al. (eds.), LNAI 723, Springer-Verlag, pages 103-122.
15. Runkel, T., Birmingham, W. B., and Balkany, A., Solving VT by Reuse, International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 44(3/4):403-433, (1996).
16. Sadeh, N. M., Micro-Opportunistic Scheduling: The Micro-Boss Factory Scheduler, In Monte Zweben and Mark S. Fox (eds.) Intelligent Scheduling: 99-135, (1994).
17. Sundin, U., Assignment and Scheduling. In: Joost Breuker and Walter Van de Velde (eds.): CommonKADS Library for Expertise Modelling - Reusable problem solving components. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pages 231-263, (1994).
18. van Heijst, G. et al., Using Generalised Directive Models in Knowledge Acquisition. Current Developments in Knowledge Acquisition EKAW '92, pages 112-132. Springer-Verlag, (1992).