A framework for assessing the quality of aviation safety databases

Safety Science

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 133-145

  Wilke, Sabine ^a   Majumdar, Arnab ^a   Ochieng, Washington Y ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Airport surface safety; Data quality; External data validation; Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Indexed keywords

AIRPORT SURFACE SAFETY; ANALYSIS AND MODELING; DATA QUALITY; DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT; DATA VALIDATION; INVESTIGATION PROCESS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONAL SAFETY CULTURE;

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AIRPORT; ARTICLE; AVIATION; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84888780162     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ale, B. et al., 2009. Causal model for air transport safety. Final report. Technical University Delft, White Queen BV, NIFV, Nationaal Lucht-en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium, DNV Consulting, JPSC Ltd, Delft, Amsterdam, London.
2. CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, 2006. Adopting CICTT taxonomies and standards. CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, USA.
3. CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, 2008. Aviation occurrence categories. Definitions and usage notes. CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, USA.
4. CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, 2010. Common taxonomies. Aviation occurrence categories. (accessed 22.03.10). http://www.intlaviationstandards.org/OccurrenceCategories.html.
5. Dupuy, M.-D., 2012. Framework for the analysis of separation-related incidents in aviation. Doctoral thesis. Imperial College London, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, London.
6. EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, 2006. Main report for the: 2005/2012 integrated risk picture for air traffic management in Europe. EUROCONTROL, Brussels.
7. EUROCONTROL, 2011. Just culture. < (accessed 09.12.11). http://www.eurocontrol.int/esp/public/standard_page/just_culture.html.
8. FAA, 2008. Runway Safety Report. FAA, Washington, D.C.
9. FAA, 2010. Advisory Circular 150/5210-24 airport foreign object debris (FOD) management. FAA, Washington, D.C.
10. Fleiss J.L., et al. Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2003, J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
11. Flight Safety Foundation, 2009. Reducing the risk of runway excursions. Flight Safety Foundation, Alexandria.
12. Garoufalia, C., 2007. Assessment for national park candidate area using multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study from the Argyll Islands and Coast. Master thesis. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
13. Global Aviation Information Network, 2003. Guide to automated airline safety information sharing systems. Global Aviation Information Network, USA.
14. Hwang C.-L., Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of-the-art survey 1981, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
15. ICAO, 2001. Annex 13 to the convention on international civil aviation. Aircraft accident and incident investigation. ICAO, Montreal.
16. ICAO, 2005. Safety management manual part 2 - the management of safety. ICAO, Montreal.
17. ICAO, 2007. Manual on the prevention of runway incursions. ICAO, Montreal.
18. ICAO, 2009. Safety magagement manual (SMS). ICAO, Montreal.
19. ICAO, 2010. United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Runway Safety Initiatives. In: ICAO high level safety conference 2010, Montreal.
20. Lee Y.W., et al. Journey to data quality 2006, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
21. NTSB, 2002. Safety report. Transportation safety databases. NTSB, Washington, D.C.
22. Saunders M., et al. Research methods for business students 2007, Pearson Education Limited, Essex.
23. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2003. Directive 2003/42/EC. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
24. UK CAA, 2011. CAP 382. The mandatory occurrence reporting scheme. UK CAA, West Sussex.
25. United States Government Accountability Office, 2010. Improved data quality and analysis capabilities are needed as FAA plans a risk-based approach to safety oversight. United States Accountability Office, Washington, D.C.
26. Wang J.-J., et al. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13(9):2263-2278.
27. Wang R.Y., Strong D.M. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 1996, 12(4):5-34.
28. Wilke S., et al. A holistic approach towards airport surface safety. Transportation Research Record - Aviation 2012, 2300:1-12.
29. Wilke, S. et al., 2011. A multi-national causal analysis of airport surface safety occurrences. In: Proceedings of the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) conference, Virginia Beach.
30. Wilke S., Majumdar A. A holistic taxonomy for critical factors underlying airport surface accidents and incidents. Journal of Airport Management 2012, 6(2):170-190.