The role of CO2-EOR for the development of a CCTS infrastructure in the North Sea Region. A techno-economic model and applications

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 20, Issue , 2014, Pages 132-159

  Mendelevitch, Roman ^a,b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b DIW BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

CCTS; Complementarity modeling

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COST FUNCTIONS; CRUDE OIL PRICE; ECONOMICS; EMISSION CONTROL; OIL FIELDS;

CCTS; COMPLEMENTARITY MODELS; EMISSION REDUCTION; EMISSION SOURCES; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; STORAGE POTENTIAL; TECHNO-ECONOMIC MODEL; TECHNO-ECONOMICS;

ENHANCED RECOVERY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CRUDE OIL; NUMERICAL MODEL; OIL FIELD; PRICE DYNAMICS;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; NORTH SEA; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84888775386     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abada I., Gabriel S., Briat V., Massol O. A generalized Nash-Cournot model for the Northwestern European Natural Gas Markets with a Fuel substitution demand function: the GaMMES model. Networks and Spatial Economics 2012, 10.1007/s11067-012-9171-5.
2. 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects 2010, Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC), Office of Cabon Capture and Storage.
3. 2 Storage in the Alberta Basin, Canada 2001, 67. US Department of Energy - National Energy Technology Laboratory, National Conference on Carbon Sequestration.
4. 2 Transport and Storage Network in the North Sea: Report to the North Sea Basin Task Force 2007, Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), in Association with Element Energy, Pönyry Energy, British Geological Survey.
5. 2-Abscheidung Und Speicherung Im Meeresgrund - Meeresökonomische Und Geologische Anforderungen Für Deren Langfristige Sicherheit Sowie Ausgestaltung Des Rechtlichen Rahmens". 24-08. Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministierium für Umwelt, Narturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungsbericht 206 25 200 2008.
6. Brøndum Nielsen L. CCS | Denmark Stops the Onshore Carbon Storage Project at the Vattenfall Nordjylland Coal Power Station." Nordjyske.dk. March 31. nordjyske.dk 2011.
7. Data by Design Ltd. UK Petroleum Data CD 2004 2012, http://www.databydesign.co.uk/energy/ukdata/book.htm.
8. DECC Oil and Gas 2012, http://og.decc.gov.uk/.
9. DOE/EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2012 - Energy Information Administration 2012, Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
10. EC Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Guidelines for trans-European Energy Infrastructure. 1364/2006/EC 2011.
11. EC Energy Roadmap 2050 - Impact Assessment and Scenario Analysis 2011.
12. EC Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Energy Roadmap 2050 2011.
13. Egging R., Holz F., Gabriel S. The World Gas Model. Energy 2010, 35(October (10)):4016-4029. 10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.053.
14. 2 stored in North American EOR projects. Society of Petroleum Engineers 2010, 10.2118/137730-MS.
15. Fetkovich M. Decline curve analysis using type curves. Journal of Petroleum Technology 1980, 32(June (6)). 10.2118/4629-PA.
16. Finkenrath M. Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation 2011, International Energy Agency (IEA/OECD), Paris, France.
17. Global CCS Institute Global Status of CCS: 2011 2011, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia.
18. Global CCS Institute CCS Ready Policy and Regulations - the State of Play 2012, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia.
19. Global CCS Institute, Parsons Brinckerhoff Accelerating the Uptake of CCS: Industrial Use of Captured Carbon Dioxide 2011, Global CCS Institute.
20. 2 Storage in depleted oil fields: the worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery. Energy Procedia 2011, 4(January):2162-2169. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.102.
21. Golombek R., Gjelsvik E., Rosendahl K. Effects of liberalizing the natural gas markets in Western Europe. The Energy Journal 1995, 16(1):85-111.
22. Golombek R., Greaker M., Kittelsen S., Røgeberg O., Roar Aune F. Carbon capture and storage technologies in the European power market. The Energy Journal 2011, 32(July (3)). 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No3-8.
23. 2 EOR and storage in oil reservoir. Oil & Gas Science and Technology 2005, 60(May (3)):537-546. 10.2516/ogst:2005036.
24. Hackett S. Pollution-controlling innovation in oligopolistic industries: some comparisons between patent races and research joint ventures. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29(November (3)):339-356. 10.1006/jeem.1995.1051.
25. Herold J., Oei P.-Y., Tissen A., Mendelevitch R. Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage: Modeling a European Infrastructure. Working Paper WP-RM-36. Resource Markets 2011, University of Potsdam, Berlin, Germany.
26. Hertwich E., Aaberg M., Singh B., Strømman A. Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture for enhanced oil recovery. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2008, 16(June (3)):343-353. 10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60085-3.
27. Hirschhausen C., von Herold J., Oei P.-Y. How a 'low carbon' innovation can fail - tales from a 'lost decade' for carbon capture, transport, and sequestration (CCTS). Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 2012, 1(April (2)). 10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.8.
28. Hirschhausen C., von Herold J., Oei P.-Y., Haftendorn C. CCTS-Technologie Ein Fehlschlag: Umdenken in Der Energiewende Notwendig. DIW-Wochenbericht 2012, 79(6):3-9.
29. 2 disposal - economic and capacity potential in the North Sea. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(February (1)):4159-4166. 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.225.
30. Huppmann D. Endogenous Investment Decisions in Natural Gas Equilibrium Models with Logarithmic Cost Functions. DIW Discussion Paper 1253 2012.
31. IEA Energy Technology Perspectives 2012. Pathways to a Clean Energy System 2012, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
32. IEA End-use prices: energy prices in national currency per unit. IEA Energy Prices and Taxes Statistics (Database) 2012, 10.1787/data-00441-en.
33. 2 Storage - Post Demonstration CCS in the EU 2011, European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Power Plants (ZEP), Brussels, Belgium.
34. IEA, UNIDO Technology Roadmap Carbon Capture and Storage in Industrial Applications 2011, IEA Publications, Paris, France.
35. 2 for EOR on the Norwegian Shelf - a Case Study 2005, Bellona, Oslo, Norway.
36. 2-EOR Cluster Developments in the UK Central North Sea/Outer Moray Firth 2012.
37. Kjärstad J., Ramdani R., Gomes P., Rootzén J., Johnsson F. Establishing an integrated CCS transport infrastructure in Northern Europe - challenges and possibilities. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2417-2424. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.135.
38. 2 value chain for the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Energy Policy 2010, 38(November (11)):6604-6614. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.031.
39. 2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2012, 38(February (1)):87-112. 10.1016/j.pecs.2011.05.001.
40. Lake L., Walsh M. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Field Data Literature Search 2008, Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
41. Leach A., Mason C., van 't Veld K. Co-optimization of Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Sequestration. Resource and Energy Economics 2011, 33(November (4)):893-912. 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.11.002.
42. Magnanti T., Wong R. Network design and transportation planning: models and algorithms. Transportation Science 1984, 18(February (1)):1-55. 10.1287/trsc.18.1.1.
43. 2 as Injection Gas for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Estimation of the Potential on the Norwegian Continental Shelf 2003, Trondheim, Norway.
44. McCormick M. A Greenhouse Gas Accounting Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage Projects 2012, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, Washington, DC, USA.
45. 2 Highways for Europe Modelling a Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Infrastructure for Europe 2010, CEPS Policy Brief, Brussels, Belgium.
46. 2 EOR) Injection Well Technology. Contek Solutions, Report prepare for the American Petroleum Institute (API) 2007.
47. Middleton R., Bielicki J. A comprehensive carbon capture and storage infrastructure model. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(February (1)):1611-1616. 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.211.
48. 2 for enhanced oil recovery. Energy Procedia 2011, 4(January):2185-2191. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.105.
49. 2 capture and storage optimization problem. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2012, 36(January (1)):18-29. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.002.
50. 2 Transport Network 2010, European Commission and Joint Research Center of the European Commission.
51. 2 transport network. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 7(March):48-61. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.011.
52. Neele F., Koenen M., van Deurzen J., Seebregts A., Groenenberg H., Thielemann T. Large-scale CCS transport and storage networks in North-West and Central Europe. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2740-2747. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.176.
53. Neuhoff K., Barquin J., Boots M., Ehrenmann A., Hobbs B., Rijkers F., Vázquez M. Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details. Energy Economics 2005, 27(May (3)):495-525. 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.12.001.
54. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate Facts 2012 - Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. September 5 2012, http://www.npd.no/en/Publications/Facts/Facts-2012/.
55. OECD, IEA World Energy Outlook 2008 2008, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
56. OECD/IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2010 2010, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
57. 2 EOR production properties of chalk. Society of Petroleum Engineers 2011, 10.2118/142993-MS.
58. Qing Sun S., Sloan R., C&C Reservoirs Quantification of uncertainty in recovery efficiency predictions: lessons learned from 250 mature carbonate fields. Society of Petroleum Engineers 2003, 10.2118/84459-MS.
59. ROAD Maasvlakte CCS Project C.V. "Project Road 2020." 2012, http://www.road2020.nl/en/road/planning/.
60. 2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1(April (2)):188-197. 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00016-3.
61. 2 Storage Around Scotland: An Integrated Strategic Research Study 2009, Scottish Government. Edinburgh, Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage, Scotland.
62. Søndergaard, M. (Ed.), Danmark. Energistyrelsen, 2012. Denmark's Oil and Gas Production 11: and Subsoil Use. Danish Energy Agency, Copenhagen.
63. Tzimas E., Georgakaki A., Garcia Cortes C., Peteves S.D. Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Carbon Dioxide in the European Energy System. Report EUR 21895 EN 2005, JRC, Institute of Energy, Petten, The Netherlands.
64. Wildenborg T., Coussy P., Doukelis A., Ekström C., Georgiou G., Gkountanis S., Kramers L., et al. Scenario for large-scale implementation of CCS in Europe. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):4265-4272.
65. WorleyParsons, Schlumberger Economic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies: 2011 Update 2011, The Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia.
66. XE Corporation Exchange Rates - X-Rates 2012, http://www.x-rates.com/.
67. 2 Transport. Post Demonstration CCS in the EU 2011, European Technology Platform for Zero Emissions Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels, Belgium.