Introduction

Towers, Turbines and Transmission Lines: Impacts on Property Value

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-10

  Dent, Peter ^a   Sims, Sally ^b  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Media; Risk and stigma; Valuation methodologies; Valuer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888721639     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118533215.ch1     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. API and PINZ (2009) NZ Real Property Guidance Note 1 (NZRPGN 1), Valuation of contaminated land. In Australian and New Zealand Valuation and Property Standards. Australian Property Institute, p. 437.
2. Appraisal Institute (2012) Guide Notes to the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Available at http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/ membership/downloads/cpe/AI_Guide_Notes.pdf. Accessed September 2012.
3. Arens, S. (1997) The valuation of defective properties: A common sense approach. The Appraisal Journal, April 1997, 143-148.
4. BBC (2002) Protest over incinerator plans. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/ uk_news/wales/2050101.stm. Accessed September 2012.
5. Bell, R. (1999) Real Estate Damages: An Analysis of Detrimental Conditions. The Appraisal Institute, Chicago, USA.
6. Bobseine, B. (2008) Will power plant affect Walpole values. Viewed at http://www.dailynewstranscript.com/news/x478930342 on 2/3/2010.
7. Bond, S. (1995) The impact of transmission lines on property values. New Zealand Valuers Journal, September, 26-28.
8. Bond, S. (2007) Cell phone tower proximity impacts on house prices: A New Zealand Case Study. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 13(1), 63-91.
9. Bond, S. and Hopkins, J. (2000) The impact of transmission lines of residential property values: Results of a case study in a suburb of Wellington, NZ. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 6(2), 52-60.
10. Bond, S. and Beamish, K. (2005) Cellular phone towers: perceived impact on residents and property values. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 11(2), 158-177.
11. Chalmers, J.A. and Roehr, S.A. (1993) Issues in the valuation of contamination property. The Appraisal Journal, 7(1), 28-41.
12. Clarke, R. (2004) Beware of the landfill. The Telegraph, 14th January, available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/newhomes/3320958/Beware-of-the-landfill. html. Accessed September 2012.
13. Coy, P. (1989) Radiation from VDTs, Power Lines Raises Fears. Register-Guard (Eugene, OR), December 3, 11C.
14. Dent, P. and Sims, S. (1999) Electricity distribution and residential property values. International Association of Housing Science (IAHS) World Housing Congress, San Francisco, USA.
15. Des Rosiers, F. (2002) Power lines, visual encumbrance and house values: A microspatial approach to impact measurement. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23(3), 275-301.
16. Filoppova, O. and Rehm, M. (2011) The impact of proximity to cell phone towers on residential property values. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 4(3), 244-267.
17. Fischhoff, B. (1985) Managing risk perceptions. Issues in Science and Technology, Fall, 83-96.
18. Gallimore, P. and Jayne, M.R. (1999) Public and professional perceptions of HVOTL risks: the problem of circularity. Journal of Property Research, 16(3), 243-255.
19. Hoen, B. (2006) Impacts of windmill visibility on property values in Madison County, New York. Project report submitted to the Faculty of the Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Annandale on Hudson, New York.
20. Hoen, B., Wiser, R., Cappers, P., Thayer, M. and Sethi, G. (2009) The impact of wind power projects on residential property values in the United States: A multi-site hedonic analysis. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL- 2829E, Berkeley, CA.
21. IEGMP (2000) Mobile phones and health: The Stewart Report. Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones, Didcot, UK.
22. IVSC (2011) International Valuation Standards 2011, IVSC, London.
23. Jayne, M.R. (2000) High voltage overhead lines and public perceptions of risk. RICS Research Foundation, London.
24. Kauko, T. (2002) Modelling the locational determinants of house prices. Neural network and value tree approaches. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.
25. Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (1992) Social Theories of Risk. Praegar Publishers. Westport, Connecticut, USA.
26. Kroll, C. and Priestley, T. (1992) The effects of overhead transmission lines on property values: A review and analysis of the literature. Unpublished report prepared for the Edison Electric Institute Siting and Environmental Planning Task Force, Washington, DC.
27. Lean, G. (2009) New nuclear plants will produce far more radiation. The Independent, 8 February 2009. Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/ green-living/new-nuclear-plants-will-produce-far-more-radiation-1604051.html. Accessed September 2012.
28. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A. and Swait, J.D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D. and Hurd, B. (1990) The effect of risk beliefs on property values: A case study of a hazardous waste site. Risk Analysis, 10(4), 485-497.
30. McLaughlin, M. (2009) New opencast mining plans are the pits, say protesters. Edinburgh Evening News, 11 August 2009.
31. Mitchell, R. and Carson, R. (1993) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
32. Mundy, W. (1992) Stigma and value. The Appraisal Journal, January 1992, 7-13.
33. Nelson, J. (2004) Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values: Problems and prospects. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38(1), 1-27.
34. Priestley, T.J. and Ignelzi, P.C. (1990) A Guide to Assessing Transmission Line Impacts in Residential Communities. Edison Electric Institute, Washington, DC.
35. Resource Manage Act (2008) Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Telecommunication Facilities) Regulations. http://www.legislation.govt. nz/regulation/public/2008/0299/latest/DLM1576701.html. Accessed October 2012.
36. RICS (1995) RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual. RICS Business Services Limited, London, UK.
37. RICS (2010) Contamination, the Environment and Sustainability, 3rd Edition. RICS Coventry, UK.
38. RICS (2012) RICS Valuation- Professional Standards (Global and UK edition). RICS London, UK.
39. Rossini, P., Marano, W., Kupke, V. and Burns, M. (2002) A comparison of models measuring the implicit price effect of aircraft noise. In Proceedings of PRRES Conference, Brisbane, Australia, January 2003. http://www.prres.net/Papers/ Rossini_Models_measuring_implicit_price_effect_of_aircraft_noise.pdf. Accessed October 2012.
40. Sims, S. and Dent, P. (2005) High voltage overhead power lines and property values: A residential study in the UK. Urban Studies, 24(4), 665-694.
41. Sims, S. and Dent, P. (2007) Property stigma: wind farms are just the latest fashion. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 25(6), 626-651.
42. Sims, S., Dent, P. and Oskrochi, G. (2008) Modelling the impact of windfarms on house prices in the UK. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 12(4), 251-269.
43. Sims, S., Dent, P. and Ennis-Reynolds, G. (2009) Calculating the cost of overheads: the real impact of HVOTLs on house price. Property Management, 27(5), 319-347.
44. Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
45. Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J. and Chalmers, J. (1991) Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of high level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis, 1(4), 683-696.
46. Syms, P. (1996) The valuation of contaminated land: The problems caused by lack of accessible data in the United Kingdom. Journal of Property Development, 1(1), 17-25.
47. Syms, P. (1997) Contaminated Land: The Practice and Economics of Redevelopment. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
48. Whitehead, J., Pattanayak, S.K., Van Houtven, G.L. and Gelso, B.R. (2008) Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the non-market value of ecological services: An assessment of the state of the science. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 872-908.