To overcome failure to publish negative findings: The OPEN project

Maturitas

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 111-112

  Littmann, Jasper ^a,b   Antes, Gerd ^c   Strech, Daniel ^a   Meerpohl, Joerg J ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EDITORIAL; EUROPE; FUNDING; HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REGISTRATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84888642505     PISSN: 03785122     EISSN: 18734111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.06.014     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE 2008;3(8):e3081.
2. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263(10):1385-9.
3. Johnson RT, Dickersin K. Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: Three of the seven deadly sins. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007;3(11): 590-1.
4. Bian Z-X, Wu T-X. Legislation for trial registration and data transparency. Trials 2010;11(64).
5. Portalupi S, von Elm E, Schmucker C, et al. Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics. Syst Rev 2013;2(2).