Use of surveillance imaging following treatment of small renal masses

Journal of Urology

Volumn 190, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1680-1685

  Kowalczyk, Keith J ^a   Harbin, Andrew C ^a   Choueiri, Toni K ^b   Hevelone, Nathanael D ^c   Lipsitz, Stuart R ^c   Trinh, Quoc Dien ^d,e   Shih, Ya Chen Tina ^f   Hu, Jim C ^g  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ablation techniques; Kidney neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ABLATION THERAPY; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOABLATION; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; SMALL RENAL MASS; TUMOR ABLATION;

EID: 84888642003     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.109     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10.
2. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S et al: Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 1331.
3. La Rochelle J, Shuch B, Riggs S et al: Functional and oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy of solitary kidneys. J Urol 2009; 181: 2037.
4. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al: Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182: 1271.
5. Volpe A, Cadeddu JA, Cestari A et al: Contemporary management of small renal masses. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 501.
6. Kunkle DA and Uzzo RG: Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: a meta-analysis. Cancer 2008; 113: 2671.
7. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL and Uzzo RG: Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemmaea meta-analysis and review. J Urol 2008; 179: 1227.
8. Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT et al: Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol 2005; 174: 466.
9. Motzer RJ, Agarwal N, Beard C et al: Kidney cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011; 9: 960.
10. Donat SM, Diaz M, Bishoff JT et al: Follow-up for clinically localized renal neoplasms: AUA Guideline. J Urol 2013; 190: 407.
11. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD et al: Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 1993; 31: 732.
12. Zippin C, Lum D and Hankey BF: Completeness of hospital cancer case reporting from the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute. Cancer 1995; 76: 2343.
13. Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM et al: Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 1258.
14. Miller DC, Schonlau M, Litwin MS et al: Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy. Cancer 2008; 112: 511.
15. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer 2010.
16. Kutikov A, Fossett LK, Ramchandani P et al: Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology 2006; 68: 737.
17. Remzi M, Ozsoy M, Klingler HC et al: Are small renal tumors harmless? Analysis of histopathological features according to tumors 4 cm or less in diameter. J Urol 2006; 176: 896.
18. Best SL, Park SK, Yaacoub RF et al: Long-term outcomes of renal tumor radio frequency ablation stratified by tumor diameter: size matters. J Urol 2012; 187: 1183.
19. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC et al: EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 398.
20. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Buffi N et al: Oncologic results of laparoscopic renal cryoablation for clinical T1a tumors: 8 years of experience in a single institution. Urology 2010; 76: 624.
21. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C et al: Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation: experience from treating 243 small renal masses over 7.5 years. Cancer 2010; 116: 3135.
22. Brenner DJ and Hall EJ: Computed tomographyean increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277.
23. Berwick DM and Hackbarth AD: Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012; 307: 1513.
24. Chang SL, Cipriano LE, Harshman LC et al: Costeffectiveness analysis of nephron sparing options for the management of small renal masses. J Urol 2011; 185: 1591.
25. Castle SM, Gorbatiy V, Avallone MA et al: Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses. Urol Oncol 2012. Epub ahead of print.
26. Kassouf W, Siemens R, Morash C et al: Follow-up guidelines after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J 2009; 3: 73.
27. Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Wieder J et al: Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4559.
28. Guillotreau J, Haber GP, Autorino R et al: Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 899.
29. Duffey B, Nguyen V, Lund E et al: Intermediateterm outcomes after renal cryoablation: results of a multi-institutional study. J Endourol 2012; 26: 15.
30. Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC et al: National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology 2006; 67: 254.