Improving affordability through innovation in the surgical treatment of mitral valve disease

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1075-1084

  Suri, Rakesh M ^a   Thompson, Jeffrey E ^a   Burkhart, Harold M ^a   Huebner, Marianne ^a   Borah, Bijan J ^a   Li, Zhuo ^a   Michelena, Hector I ^a   Visscher, Sue L ^a   Roger, Veronique L ^a   Daly, Richard C ^a   Cook, David J ^a   Enriquez Sarano, Maurice ^a   Schaff, Hartzell V ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; OPEN HEART SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; ROBOTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS INNOVATION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888632769     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Antman EM, Harrington RA. Transforming clinical trials in cardiovascular disease: mission critical for health and economic well-being. JAMA. 2012;308(17):1743-1744.
2. Milstein A, Shortell S. Innovations in care delivery to slow growth of US health spending. JAMA. 2012;308(14): 1439-1440.
3. Orszag PR. How health care can save or sink America: the case for reform and fiscal sustainability. Foreign Affairs website. http://www.foreignaffairs. com/articles/67918/peter-r-orszag/how-health-care-can-save-or-sink-america. Published July/ August 2011. Accessed January 1, 2013.
4. Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(9): 875-883.
5. Suri RM, Vanoverschelde JL, Grigioni F, et al. Association between early surgical intervention vs watchful waiting and outcomes for mitral regurgitation due to flail mitral valve leaflets. JAMA. 2013;310(6):609-616.
6. Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(2):438-442.
7. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(6):1395- 1404.
8. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(6):455-462.
9. Suri RM, Antiel RM, Burkhart HM, et al. Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(3):761-769.
10. Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, et al.; Surgical Process Improvement Team, Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a highvolume tertiary-care academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):83-92.
11. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55.
12. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [published corrections appear in Circulation. 2007;115(15):e409
13. and Circulation. 2010;121(23): e443.
14. Circulation. 2006;114(5):e84-e231.
15. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Rehfeldt KH, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011; 86(9):838-844.
16. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Daly RC, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(5):970-979.
17. Dunlay SM, Shah ND, Shi Q, et al. Lifetime costs of medical care after heart failure diagnosis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(1):68-75.
18. Thompson JM, Luedtke CA, Oh TH, et al. Direct medical costs in patients with fibromyalgia: cost of illness and impact of a brief multidisciplinary treatment program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(1):40-46.
19. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Berenson-Eggers Type of Service (BETOS). CMS.gov website. http://www.cms. gov/Medicare/Coding/ HCPCSReleaseCodeSets/BETOS.html. Accessed September 1, 2012.
20. Kaplan RS, Porter ME. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2011;89(9):46-52:54, 56-61 passim.
21. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costsd the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8): 701-704.
22. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(26):2477-2481.
23. Anyanwu AC, Bridgewater B, Adams DH. The lottery of mitral valve repair surgery. Heart. 2010;96(24):1964-1967.
24. Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, et al. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(5):1431-1437.
25. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg. 1997; 226(4):421-426.
26. Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(6):1535-1538.
27. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1507-1514.