Bargaining demolition in China: A practice of distrust

Critique of Anthropology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 412-428

  Ho, Cheuk Yuet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agency; evictees; power; practice; structure; Urban housing demolition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888618254     PISSN: 0308275X     EISSN: 14603721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0308275X13501902     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Standing Their Ground: Thousands Face Forced Eviction in China. London: Amnesty International Ltd; 2012:.
2. Berard T.Rethinking practices and structures.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2005;35:196-230.
3. Bourdieu POutline of a Theory of Practice (trans.) Nice R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977:.
4. Bourdieu PThe Logic of Practice (trans.) Nice R. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1990:.
5. Chau A.An awful mark: symbolic violence and urban renewal in reform-era China.Visual Studies. 2008;23:195-210.
6. Chen X (2010) (Social capital and households' rights defence action: a case study) (Youth Studies) 33(6): 15-22.
7. Fang Y and Wang B (2006) (A sociological thought on urban demolition and relocation) (Journal of Fujian Party School) 9: 53-57.
8. Feng Y (2004) (A game between power, rights and interests) (China Legal Science) 19(4): 40-81.
9. Giddens ACentral Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1979:.
10. Holston JInsurgent Citizenship: Disjunction of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008:.
11. Mukhija VSquatters as Developers?: Slum Demolition and Redevelopment in Mumbai, India. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing; 2003:.
12. Ortner SAnthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. London: Duke University Press; 2006:.
13. Peng X and Zheng Y (2010) (The game of interests, institutional justice, and the mechanism of resolving urban demolition conflicts) (Journal of Chongqing University) 16(1): 39-46.
14. Postill JTheorising Media and Practice. Bräuchler BPostill J, ed. Oxford: Berghahn; 2010:1-23.
15. Rouse JHandbook of the Philosophy of Science. Vol 15: Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Turner SRisjord M, ed. Dordrecht: Elsevier; 2006:499-540.
16. Schatzki T.Practices and actions: a Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 1997;27:283-308.
17. Shao QShanghai Gone: Domicide and Defiance in a Chinese Megacity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2013:.
18. Smart A.Unruly places: urban governance and the persistence of illegality in Hong Kong's urban squatter areas.American Anthropologist. 2001;103 (1): 30-44.
19. Xu M and Huang D (2010) (The leap from 'demolition' to 'expropriation' of urban houses and the institutional advancement of private property protection). (Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities) 31(12): 90-95.
20. Yessenova S.Borrowed places: eviction wars and property rights formalization in Kazakhstan.Research in Economic Anthropology. 2010;30:11-45.
21. Zhang LiStrangers in the city: Reconfigurations of space, power, and social networks within China's floating population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2001:.
22. Zhang Li (2004) Forced from home: property rights, civic activism, and the politics of relocation in China. Urban Anthropology 33: 247-281.