Evaluation of current RDF database solutions

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 539, Issue , 2009, Pages 39-55

  Stegmaier, Florian ^a   Gröbner, Udo ^a   Döller, Mario ^a   Kosch, Harald ^a   Baese, Gero ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STORE; DIGITAL STILL IMAGES; EFFICIENCY COMPARISONS; RDF DATABASE; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION FORMATS; SEARCH CAPABILITIES; SPARQL QUERIES; UNSTRUCTURED DATA;

DIGITAL STORAGE; METADATA; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; XML;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84888423607     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. David Beckett. Turtle - terse rdf triple language. http://www.dajobe.org/ 2004/01/turtle/, November 2007.
2. Anders Berglund, Scott Boag, Don Chamberlin, Mary F. Fernandez, Michael Kay, Jonathan Robie, and Jerome Simeon. XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/2007.
3. Tim Berners-Lee. Notation 3. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3, March 2006.
4. Jeen Broekstra and Arjohn Kampman. SeRQL: A Second Generation RDF Query Language. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/events/20031113-storage/positions/ aduna.pdf, November 2003.
5. Christian Bizer et al. Benchmarking the performance of storage systems that expose sparql endpoints. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web knowledge Base Systems (SSWS2008), 2008.
6. Kurt Rohlo et al. An evaluation of triple-store technologies for large data stores. In Robert Meersman et al., editor, OTM Workshops (2), volume 4806 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1105-1114. Springer, 2007.
7. Michael Schmidt et al. SP2Bench: A SPARQL Performance Benchmark. CoRR, abs/0806.4627, 2008.
8. Pascal Hitzler et al. Semantic Web. Springer, 2008.
9. Yuanbo Guo et al. Lubm: A benchmark for owl knowledge base systems. J. Web Sem., 3(2-3):158-182, 2005.
10. Gregory Karvounarakis, Soa Alexaki, Vassilis Christophides, Dimitris Plexousakis and Michel Scholl. RQL: a declarative query language for RDF. In WWW, pages 592-603, 2002.
11. Eric Prud hommeaux and Andy Seaborne. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/, 2008.
12. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Dublin core metadata element set - version 1.1: Reference description. http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/2008.
13. J. M. Martinez, R. Koenen, and F. Pereira. MPEG-7. IEEE Multimedia, 9(2):78- 87, April-June 2002.
14. Peter Haase, Jeen Broekstra, Andreas Eberhart and Raphael Volz. A Comparison of RDF Query Languages. In International Semantic Web Conference, volume 3298, pages 502-517, 2004.
15. Andy Seaborne. RDQL - A Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/ Submission/2004/SUBM-RDQL-20040109/January 2004.
16. W3C. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/XML/February 2004.
17. W3C. Rdf test cases. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/February 2004.
18. W3C. RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf- syntax-grammar/February 2004.
19. W3C. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/2004.
20. W3C. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. W3C, http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/ REC-xquery-20070123/, 2007.
21. W3C SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ January 2008.