On-farm treatment of swine manure based on solid-liquid separation and biological nitrification-denitrification of the liquid fraction

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 132, Issue , 2014, Pages 87-93

  Riano B ^a   Garcia Gonzalez M C ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AGRARIO DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coagulation flocculation; Nitrification denitrification; Pathogens; Running cost; Screw pressing; Swine manure

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COAGULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FARMS; FERTILIZERS; FLOCCULATION; NITRIFICATION; NITROGEN; NITROGEN REMOVAL; PHOSPHORUS; WATER POLLUTION;

BIOLOGICAL NITRIFICATION; COAGULATION FLOCCULATION; LIQUID FRACTION; NITRIFICATION-DENITRIFICATION; PIG FARMING; RUNNING COST; SCREW PRESSINGS; SOIL AND WATER; SOLID-LIQUID SEPARATION; SWINE MANURE;

MANURES;

COPPER; NITROGEN; ORGANIC MATTER; PHOSPHOROUS ACID; ZINC;

BACTERIUM; COAGULATION; DENITRIFICATION; FLOCCULATION; MANURE; NITRIFICATION; PIG; SOIL POLLUTION; WASTE TREATMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DENITRIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLOCCULATION; MANURE; NITRIFICATION; NONHUMAN; PIG FARMING; SALMONELLA; SWINE; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; SALMONELLA; SUIDAE;

COAGULATION-FLOCCULATION; NITRIFICATION-DENITRIFICATION; PATHOGENS; RUNNING COST; SCREW PRESSING; SWINE MANURE;

ANIMALS; DENITRIFICATION; FLOCCULATION; MANURE; NITRIFICATION; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SEASONS; SPAIN; SUS SCROFA; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 84888405073     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Acitores M., Pérez P., González C., León C., García M.C. Optimización de una planta de tratamiento de purines de cerdo mediante un sistema de fangos activados. ISimposio Internacional sobre Gerenciamento de Residuos de Animais. Tratamento de Dejetos de Animais. 11-13th May, Florionópils, SC (Brasil) 2009.
2. Spanish National Agency of Meteorology (AEMET). <. http://www.aemet.es/en/eltiempo/observacion/ultimosdatos?k=cle%26l=2192C%26w=2%26datos=img%3e.
3. Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Amon T., Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112:153-162.
4. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. 21st ed.
5. Béline F., Daumer M.L., Loyon L., Pourcher A.M., Dabert P., Guiziou F., Peu P. The efficiency of the biological aerobic treatment of piggery wastewater to control nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogen and gas emissions. Proceedings of the Eighth Specialized Conference on Small Water and Wastewater Systems, Coimbatore, India, February 6-9- CD-rom 2008.
6. Bernet N., Béline F. Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5431-5436.
7. Bolan N., Adriano D., Mahimairaja S. Distribution and bioavailability of trace elements in livestock and poultry manure by products. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 34:291-338.
8. Burton C.H. The potential contribution of separation technologies to the management of livestock manure. Livest. Sci. 2007, 112:208-216.
9. Burton C.H., Turner C. Manure Management: Treatment Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture 2003, 178-179. Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UK.
10. Clemens J., Trimborn M., Weiland P., Amon B. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112:171-177.
11. Daumer M.L., Béline F., Guiziou F., Spérandio M. Influence of pH and biological metabolism on dissolved phosphorous during biological treatment of piggery wastewater. Biosys. Eng. 2007, 96:379-386.
12. Ebeling J.M., Rishel K.L., Sibrell P.L. Screening and evaluation of polymers as flocculation aids for the treatment of aquacultural effluents. Aquac. Eng. 2005, 33(4):235-249.
13. European Commission Commission Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003 of 25 July 2003 amending the conditions for authorisation of a number of additives in feedingstuffs belonging to the group of trace elements. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2003, L187:11.
14. Ferrer M., Orús F., Monge E. Determinación de formas nitrogenadas en estiércol fluido de porcino (EFP) por distintos métodos analíticos. Anaporc 2000, 205:86-101.
15. Flotats X., Bonmatí A., Fernández B., Magrí A. Manure treatment Technologies: on-farm versus centralizad strategies. NE Spain as case study. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5519-5526.
16. Flotats X., Foged H.F., Bonmatí A., Palatsi J., Magri A., Schelde K.M. Manure Processing Technologies. Technical Report No. II Concerning "Manure Processing Activities in Europe" to the European Commission 2011, 184. Directorate-General Environment.
17. González-Fernández C., Nieto-Diez P.P., León-Cofreces C., García-Encina P.A. Solids and nutrients removals from the liquid fraction of swine slurry through screening and flocculation treatment and influence of these processes on anaerobic biodegradability. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:6233-6239.
18. Hjorth M., Christensen K.V., Christensen M.L., Sommer S.G. Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30:153-180.
19. Hoorfar J., Ahrens P., Radstrom P. Automated 5' nuclease PCR assay for identification of Salmonella enterica. J.Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38(9):3429-3435.
20. Kunz A., Miele M., Steinmetz R.L.R. Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5485-5489.
21. López-Alonso M., Benedito J.L., Miranda M., Castillo C., Hernández J., Shore R.F. The effect of pig farming on copper and zind accumulation in cattle in Galicia (North-Western Spain). Vet. J. 2000, 160:259-266.
22. Loughrin J.H., Vanotti M.B., Szogi A.A., Lovanh N. Evaluation of second-generation multistage wastewater treatment system for the removal of malodors from liquid swine manure. J.Environ. Qual. 2009, 38:1739-1748.
23. 2) from the aerobic treatment of piggery slurry - comparison with a conventional storage system. Biosyst. Eng. 2007, 97:472-780.
24. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino (MARM), 2010. , reference date (23.11.12). http://www.mapa.es/es/estadistica/pags/anuario/2008/indice.asp.
25. Martínez J., Burton C. Manure management and treatment in Europe: a review on environmental technological and policy perspective. Libro de Actas del I Congreso Español de Gestión Integral de Deyecciones Ganaderas 2008, 257-272. Barcelona, Spain. A. Magrí, F.X. Prenafeta-Boldú, X. Flotats (Eds.).
26. Martínez-Almela J., Barrera J.M. SELCO-Ecopurin pig slurry treatment system. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:223-228.
27. Nolan T., Troy S.H., Gilkinson S., Frost P., Xie S., Zhan X., Harrington C., Healy M.G., Lawlor P.G. Economic analyses of pig manure treatment options in Ireland. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 105:15-23.
28. Oleszkiewicz J.A. Nitrogen transformation in an aerated lagoon treating piggery wastes. Agric. Wastes 1986, 16:171-181.
29. Pertersen S.O., Sommer S.G., Béline F., Burton C., Dach J., Dourmad J.Y., Leip A., Misselbrook T., Nicholson F., Poulsen H.D., Provolo G., Sørensen P., Vinneras B., Weiske A., Bernal M.P., Böhm R., Juhász C., Mihelic R. Recycling of livestock manure in a whole-farm perspective. Livest. Sci. 2007, 112:180-191.
30. Tchobanoglous G., Burton F.L. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse 1991, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, USA.
31. Vanotti M.B., Hunt P.G. Treatment and sustainable management of manure and by-products: problems and solutions in USA. Porci Monograph, No. 65 2001, 67-83. INIA, Spain.
32. Vanotti M.B., Rashash D.M.C., Hunt P.G. Solid-liquid separation of flushed swine manure with PAM: effect of wastewater strength. Trans. ASAE 2002, 45(6):1959-1969.
33. Vanotti M.B., Millner P.D., Hunt P.G., Ellison A.Q. Removal of pathogens and indicator microorganisms from liquid manure in multi-step biological and chemical treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:209-214.
34. Vanotti M.B., Szogi A.A., Hunt P.G., Millner P.D., Humenik F.J. Development of environmentally superior treatment system to replace anaerobic swine lagoons in the USA. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:3184-3194.
35. Vanotti M.B., Szogi A.A., Vives C.A. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:759-766.
36. Vanotti M.B., Szogi A.A., Millner P.D., Loughrin J.H. Development of a second-generation environmentally superior technology for treatment of swine manure in the USA. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5406-5416.
37. Walkey A., Black I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37:29-38.
38. Westerman P.W., Bicudo J.R., Kantardjieff A. Upflow biological aerated filters for the treatment of flushed manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:181-190.