Using patient-specific phantoms to evaluate deformable image registration algorithms for adaptive radiation therapy

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 177-194

  Stanley, Nick ^a   Glide Hurst, Carri ^a   Kim, Jinkoo ^a   Adams, Jeffrey ^b   Li, Shunshan ^a   Wen, Ning ^a   Chetty, Indrin J ^a   Zhong, Hualiang ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deformable image registration; Deformable phantom; Finite element modeling; Validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888403271     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15269914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.4363     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Frazier A, Yan D, Du M, et al. Effects of treatment setup variation on beam's eye view dosimetry for radiation therapy using the multileaf collimator vs. the cerrobend block. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33(5):1247-56.
2. Frazier RC, Vicini FA, Sharpe MB, et al. Impact of breathing motion on whole breast radiotherapy: a dosimetric analysis using active breathing control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58(4):1041-47.
3. Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, Martinez A. Adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(1):123-32.
4. Kessler ML. Image registration and data fusion in radiation therapy. Br J Radiol. 2006;79 Spec No 1:S99-S108.
5. Jenkinson M and Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001;5(2):143-56.
6. Rohr K, Stiehl HS, Sprengel R, Buzug TM, Weese J, Kuhn MH. Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(6):526-34.
7. Rueckert D, Aljabar P, Heckemann RA, Hajnal JV, Hammers A. Diffeomorphic registration using B-splines. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):702-09.
8. Thirion JP. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons. Med Image Anal. 1998;2(3):243-60.
9. Silva JS, Cancela J, Teixeira L. Fast volumetric registration method for tumor follow-up in pulmonary CT exams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12(2):362-65.
10. Glocker B, Paragios N, Komodakis N, Tziritas G, Navab N. Inter and intra-modal deformable registration: continuous deformations meet efficient optimal linear programming. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2007;20:408-20.
11. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999;18(8):712-21.
12. Lu W, Chen ML, Olivera GH, Ruchala KJ, Mackie TR. Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(14):3067-87.
13. Fallone BG, Rivest DR, Riauka TA, Murtha AD. Assessment of a commercially available automatic deformable registration system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(3):3175.
14. Bender ET and Tome WA. The utilization of consistency metrics for error analysis in deformable image registration. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(18):5561-77.
15. Hardcastle N, Tome WA, Cannon DM, et al. A multi-institution evaluation of deformable image registration algorithms for automatic organ delineation in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:90.
16. Brock KK. Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(2):583-96.
17. Castillo R, Castillo E, Guerra R, et al. A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(7):1849-70.
18. Kashani R, Hub M, Balter JM, et al. Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study. Med Phys. 2008;35(12):5944-53.
19. Liu F, Hu Y, Zhang Q, Kincaid R, Goodman KA, Mageras GS. Evaluation of deformable image registration and a motion model in CT images with limited features. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(9):2539-54.
20. Vaman C, Staub D, Williamson J, Murphy MJ. A method to map errors in the deformable registration of 4DCT images. Med Phys. 2010;37(11):5765-76.
21. Schreibmann E, Pantalone P, Waller A, Fox T. A measure to evaluate deformable registration fields in clinical settings. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(5):126-39.
22. Zhong H, Peters T, Siebers JV. FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(16):4721-38.
23. Bender ET and Tome WA. The utilization of consistency metrics for error analysis in deformable image registration. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(18):5561-77.
24. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage. 2009;46(3):786-802.
25. Heath E and Seuntjens J. A direct voxel tracking method for four-dimensional Monte Carlo dose calculations in deforming anatomy. Med Phys. 2006;33(2):434-45.
26. Zhong H and Siebers JV. Monte Carlo dose mapping on deforming anatomy. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(19):5815-30.
27. Salguero FJ, Saleh-Sayah NK, Yan C, Siebers JV. Estimation of three-dimensional intrinsic dosimetric uncertainties resulting from using deformable image registration for dose mapping. Med Phys. 2011;38(1):343-53.
28. Lee HP, Lin MC, Foskey M. Physically-based validation of deformable medical image registration. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 2):830-38.
29. Zhong H, Kim J, Chetty IJ. Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling. Med Phys. 2010;37(3):970-79.
30. Wang H, Dong L, O'Daniel J, et al. Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(12):2887-905.
31. Serban M, Heath E, Stroian G, Collins DL, Seuntjens J. A deformable phantom for 4D radiotherapy verification: design and image registration evaluation. Med Phys. 2008;35(3):1094-102.
32. Chang J, Suh TS, Lee DS. Development of a deformable lung phantom for the evaluation of deformable registration. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(1):281-86.
33. Kerdok AE, Cotin SM, Ottensmeyer MP, Galea AM, Howe RD, Dawson SL. Truth cube: establishing physical standards for soft tissue simulation. Med Image Anal. 2003;7(3):283-91.
34. Nie K, Chuang C, Kirby N, Braunstein S, Pouliot J. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations. Med Phys. 2013;40(4):041911.
35. Varadhan R, Karangelis G, Krishnan K, Hui S. A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(1):192-213.
36. Zhong H, Jin JY, Ajlouni M, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Measurement of regional compliance using 4DCT images for assessment of radiation treatment. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1567-78.
37. Nesetril J, Milkova E, Nesetrilova H. Otakar Boruvka on minimum spanning tree problem. Translation of both the 1926 papers, comments, history. Discrete Mathematics. 2001;233(1-3):3-36.
38. Murphy MJ, Wei Z, Fatyga M, et al. How does CT image noise affect 3D deformable image registration for image-guided radiotherapy planning? Med Phys. 2008;35(3):1145-53.
39. Jaffray DA and Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2000;27(6):1311-23.
40. Zhong H, Kim J, Li H, Nurushev T, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. A finite element method to correct deformable image registration errors in low-contrast regions. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(11):3499-515.