Intention-to-treat analyses for interventional studies

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 95 B, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1443-1444

  Griffin, X L ^a   Parsons, N ^a   Carey Smith, R ^b   Stengel, D ^c   Costa, M L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNFALLKRANKENHAUS BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON;

EID: 84888387523     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32419     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:332.
2. Senn S. Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials. Stat Med 2013;32:1439- 1450.
3. Angadi DS, Brown S, Crawfurd EJ. Cemented polyethylene and cementless porous-coated acetabular components have similar outcomes at a mean of seven years after total hip replacement: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94-B: 1604-1610.