Ridge preservation comparing socket allograft alone to socket allograft plus facial overlay xenograft: A clinical and histologic study in humans

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1567-1575

  Poulias, Evmenios ^a   Greenwell, Henry ^b   Hill, Margaret ^b   Morton, Dean ^b   Vidal, Ricardo ^b   Shumway, Brian ^b   Peterson, Thomas L ^c  

^a Private Practice   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^c Private practice   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone cements; Bone regeneration; Bone transplantation; Heterologous; Homologous; Tooth extraction; Transplantation

Indexed keywords

POLYESTER; POLYLACTIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOPSY; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CATTLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STENT; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH SOCKET; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; XENOGRAFT;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFTS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANIMALS; BIOPSY; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CATTLE; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL; HETEROGRAFTS; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MIDDLE AGED; POLYESTERS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STENTS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84888352481     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120585     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-218.
2. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-652.
3. Araújo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:123-135.
4. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:545-549.
5. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:9-13.
6. Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, et al. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol 1997;68:563-570.
7. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, et al. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 1998;69: 1044-1049.
8. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, et al. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:581-586.
9. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-999.
10. Serino G, Biancu S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: A clinical and histological study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:651-658.
11. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: A clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 2008;79:1370-1377.
12. Pelegrine AA, da Costa CE, Correa ME, Marques JF JrJr. Clinical and histomorphometric evaluation of extraction sockets treated with an autologous bone marrow graft. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:535-542.
13. Festa VM, Addabbo F, Laino L, Femiano F, Rullo R. Porcine-derived xenograft combined with a soft cortical membrane versus extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical study in humans [published online ahead of print November 14, 2011]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208. 2011.00398.
14. Brownfield LA, Weltman RL. Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft: A clinical, radiographic, micro-computed tomography, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge. J Periodontol 2012;83:581-589.
15. Nemcovsky CE, Serfaty V. Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 23 consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1996; 67:390-395.
16. Simon BI, Von Hagen S, Deasy MJ, Faldu M, Resnansky D. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following ridge augmentation using bone graft and membranes. J Periodontol 2000;71:1774-1791.
17. Zubillaga G, Von Hagen S, Simon BI, Deasy MJ. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following post-extraction ridge augmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralized freezedried bone osteoinductive graft. J Periodontol 2003;74: 965-975.
18. Vance GS, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Johnston H, Scheetz JP. Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: A clinical and histologic study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:491-497.
19. Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: A clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28: 469-477.
20. Neiva RF, Tsao YP, Eber R, Shotwell J, Billy E, Wang HL. Effects of a putty-form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 on alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontol 2008;79:291-299.
21. Beck TM, Mealey BL. Histologic analysis of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized human bone allograft. J Periodontol 2010;81:1765-1772.
22. Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:688-698.
23. Toloue SM, Chesnoiu-Matei I, Blanchard SB. A clinical and histomorphometric study of calcium sulfate compared with freeze-dried bone allograft for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontol 2012;83:847-855.
24. Fernandes PG, Novaes AB JrJr., de Queiroz AC, et al. Ridge preservation with acellular dermal matrix and anorganic bone matrix cell-binding peptide P-15 after tooth extraction in humans. J Periodontol 2011;82: 72-79.
25. Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: A comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011;82:377-387.
26. Gholami GA, Najafi B, Mashhadiabbas F, Goetz W, Najafi S. Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1198-1204.
27. Nam HW, Park JB, Lee JY, et al. Enhanced ridge preservation by bone mineral bound with collagenbinding synthetic oligopeptide: A clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2011;82:471-480.
28. Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF, Iglhaut G, Beuer F. Preservation of the ridge and sealing of the socket with a combination epithelialised and subepithelial connective tissue graft for management of defects in the buccal bone before insertion of implants: A case series. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:550-555.
29. Brkovic BM, Prasad HS, Konandreas G, et al. Simple preservation of a maxillary extraction socket using beta-tricalcium phosphate with type I collagen: Preliminary clinical and histomorphometric observations. J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74:523-528.
30. Kutkut A, Andreana S, Kim HL, Monaco E JrJr. Extraction socket preservation graft before implant placement with calcium sulfate hemihydrate and platelet-rich plasma: A clinical and histomorphometric study in humans. J Periodontol 2012;83:401-409.
31. Wood RA, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Periodontol 2012;83:329-336.
32. Hoang TN, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles. J Periodontol 2012;83:174-181.
33. Fotek PD, Neiva RF, Wang HL. Comparison of dermal matrix and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for socket bone augmentation: A clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol 2009;80:776-785.
34. Wang HL, Misch C, Neiva RF. ''Sandwich'' bone augmentation technique: Rationale and report of pilot cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24: 232-245.
35. Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Cho S-C, et al. Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: Histomorphometric and clinical analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:551-559.
36. Scarano A, Pecora G, Piattelli M, Piattelli A. Osseointegration in a sinus augmented with bovine porous bone mineral: Histological results in an implant retrieved 4 years after insertion. A case report. J Periodontol 2004;75:1161-1166.
37. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;174:28-42.
38. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S. The biology of bone grafts. Semin Arthroplasty 1993;4:58-63.
39. Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Santoro A, Sbordone L. Volume changes of iliac crest autogenous bone grafts after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillas and mandibles: A 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:2559-2565.
40. Sbordone L, Levin L, Guidetti F, Sbordone C, Glikman A, Schwartz-Arad D. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:485-491.
41. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135.
42. Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967; 38 (Suppl. 6)610-616.
43. Bernimoulin JP, Luscher B, Muhlemann HR. Coronally repositioned periodontal flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:1-13.
44. Adams DA. Ridge preservation comparing an intrasocket FDBA allograft alone to a combined intra-And extra-socket FDBA allograft both covered with acellular dermal matrix membrane. [Thesis]. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville; 2005. 70 p.
45. Siu TL. Ridge preservation comparing a flap vs. flapless technique using a demineralized bone matrix allograft plus mineralized particulate allograft and covered with a calcium sulfate barrier. [Thesis]. Louisville, KY. University of Louisville; 2007. 80 p.
46. Witonsky J. Ridge preservation comparing the clinical and histologic healing of a mineralized particulate allograft with a nonporous PTFE membrane vs. mineralized particulate xenograft with a collagen plug membrane. [Thesis]. Louisville, KY. University of Louisville; 2009. 74 p.
47. Sams M. Ridge preservation comparing the clinical and histologic healing of a mineralized cortical vs. a mineralized cancellous allograft with an acellular dermal matrix barrier membrane. [Thesis]. Louisville, KY. University of Louisville; 2010. 70 p.
48. Kotevska V. Ridge preservation comparing the clinical and histologic healing of a demineralized particulate bone allograft vs. mineralized particulate cancellous allograft using a barrier membrane. [Thesis]. Louisville, KY. University of Louisville; 2011. 73 p.
49. Scheid RC, Weiss G. Woelfel's Dental Anatomy, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012: 65-162.
50. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:119-128.
51. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(Suppl.):43-61.