Preferred retinal locus profile during prolonged fixation attempts

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 368-374

  Morales, Marco Ulises ^a   Saker, Saker ^a   Mehta, Rajnikant L ^a   Rubinstein, Martin ^a   Amoaku, Winfried M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION; CHORIORETINITIS; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY; HUMAN; IRIDOCYCLITIS; LOW VISION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREFERRED RETINAL LOCUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; RETINA MACULA EDEMA; SUBRETINAL NEOVASCULARIZATION; VISION;

AGED; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINA; RETINAL DISEASES; VISION, LOW; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS;

EID: 84888312419     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sunness JS, Applegate CA, Haselwood D, Rubin GS. Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. Ophthalmology. 1996;103: 1458-66.
2. Lei H, Schuchard RA. Using two preferred retinal loci for different lighting conditions in patients with central scotomas. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 1812-8.
3. Safran AB, Duret F, Issenhuth M, Mermoud C. Full text reading with a central scotoma: pseudo regressions and pseudo line losses. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83: 1341-7.
4. Schuchard RA, Naseer S, de Castro K. Characteristics of AMD patients with low vision receiving visual rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36: 294-302.
5. Deruaz A, Whatham AR, Mermoud C, Safran AB. Reading with multiple preferred retinal loci: implications for training a more efficient reading strategy. Vision Res. 2002;42: 2947-57.
6. Crossland MD, Crabb DP, Rubin GS. Task-specific fixation behavior in macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 411-6.
7. Midena E, Radin PP, Pilotto E, Ghirlando A, Convento E, Varano M. Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. A microperimetry study. Semin Ophthalmol. 2004;19: 55-61.
8. Rohrschneider K, Bultmann S, Springer C. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27: 536-48.
9. Vingolo EM, Cavarretta S, Domanico D, Parisi F, Malagola R. Microperimetric biofeedback in AMD patients. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007;32: 185-9.
10. Tarita-Nistor L, González EG, Mandelcorn MS, Lillakas L, Steinbach MJ. Fixation stability, fixation location, and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50: 84-9.
11. Dunbar HMP, Crossland MD, Rubin GS. Fixation stability: a comparison between the Nidek MP-1 and the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope in persons with and without diabetic maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51: 4346-50.
12. Markowitz SN, Reyes SV. Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48: 340-57.
13. Fujii GY, de Juan E, Sunness J, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS. Patient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 2002;109: 1737-44.
14. Crossland M, Jackson M-L, Seiple WH. Microperimetry: a review of fundus related perimetry. Optom Rep. 2012;2: 11-5.
15. Greenstein VC, Santos RA, Tsang SH, Smith RT, Barile GR, Seiple W. Preferred retinal locus in macular disease: characteristics and clinical implications. Retina. 2008;28: 1234-40.
16. Timberlake GT, Peli E, Essock EA, Augliere RA. Reading with a macular scotoma. II. Retinal locus for scanning text. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28: 1268-74.
17. Markowitz SN, Reyes SV, Shima N. Functional retinal locus rather than multiple PRLs? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1191.