Application of the steepest slope model reveals different perfusion territories within the mouse placenta

Placenta

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 899-906

  Remus, C C ^a   Sedlacik, J ^a   Wedegaertner, U ^a   Arck, P ^a   Hecher, K ^a   Adam, G ^a   Forkert, N D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Placental perfusion; Steepest slope model

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTERY; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; GESTATIONAL AGE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; KIDNEY; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PLACENTA; PLACENTA PERFUSION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEEPEST SLOPE MODEL; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; PLACENTAL PERFUSION; STEEPEST SLOPE MODEL;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; PLACENTA; PLACENTAL CIRCULATION; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84888306874     PISSN: 01434004     EISSN: 15323102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.06.304     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hafner E, Metzenbauer M, Stümpflen I, Waldhör T, Philipp K. First trimester placental and myometrial blood perfusion measured by 3D power Doppler in normal and unfavourable outcome pregnancies. Placenta 2010 Sep;31(9): 756-63.
2. Zabihi S, Wentzel P, Eriksson UJ. Altered uterine perfusion is involved in fetal outcome of diabetic rats. Placenta 2008 May;29(5):413-21.
3. Kulandavelu S, Whiteley KJ, Qu D, Mu J, Bainbridge SA, Adamson SL. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase deficiency reduces uterine blood flow, spiral artery elongation, and placental oxygenation in pregnant mice. Hypertension 2012 Jul;60(1):231-8.
4. Adamson SL, Lu Y, Whiteley KJ, Holmyard D, Hemberger M, Pfarrer C, et al. Interactions between trophoblast cells and the maternal and fetal circulation in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol 2002 Oct;250(2):358-73.
5. Toal M, Chan C, Fallah S, Alkazaleh F, Chaddha V, Windrim RC, et al. Usefulness of a placental profile in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 Apr;196(4):363. e1-7.
6. Papageorghiou AT, Yu CKH, Nicolaides KH. The role of uterine artery Doppler in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004 Jun;18(3):383-96.
7. Abramowicz JS, Sheiner E. In utero imaging of the placenta: Importance for diseases of pregnancy. Placenta 2007 Apr;28(Suppl. A):S14-22.
8. Lovgren TR, Dugoff L, Galan HL. Uterine artery Doppler and prediction of preeclampsia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010 Dec;53(4):888-98.
9. Yagel S, Anteby EY, Shen O, Cohen SM, Friedman Z, Achiron R. Placental blood flow measured by simultaneous multigate spectral Doppler imaging in pregnancies complicated by placental vascular abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999 Oct;14(4):262-6.
10. Lai PK, Wang YA, Welsh AW. Reproducibility of regional placental vascularity/perfusion measurement using 3D power Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010 Aug;36(2):202-9.
11. Salomon LJ, Siauve N, Balvay D, Cuénod CA, Vayssettes C, Luciani A, et al. Placental perfusion MR imaging with contrast agents in a mouse model. Radiology 2005 Apr;235(1):73-80.
12. Taillieu F, Salomon LJ, Siauve N, Clement O, Faye N, Balvay D, et al. Placental perfusion and permeability: simultaneous assessment with dual-echo contrastenhanced MR imaging in mice. Radiology 2006 Dec 1;241(3):737-45.
13. Tomlinson TM, Garbow JR, Anderson JR, Engelbach JA, Nelson DM, Sadovsky Y. Magnetic resonance imaging of hypoxic injury to the murine placenta. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010 Feb;298(2):R312-9.
14. Miles KA. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1991 May;64(761):409-12.
15. Chalouhi GE, Deloison B, Siauve N, Aimot S, Balvay D, Cuenod CA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: definitive imaging of placental function Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011 Feb;16(1):22-8.
16. Salomon LJ, Siauve N, Taillieu F, Balvay D, Vayssettes C, Frija G, et al. In vivo dynamic MRI measurement of the noradrenaline-induced reduction in placental blood flow in mice. Placenta 2006 Aug;27(9-10):1007-13.
17. Padhani AR, Khan AA. Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrastenhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy. Target Oncol 2010 Mar;5(1):39-52.
18. Padhani AR, Hayes C, Landau S, Leach MO. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues. NMR Biomed 2002 Apr;15(2):143-53.
19. Alonzi R, Padhani AR, Allen C. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2007 Sep;63(3):335-50.
20. Brix G, Zwick S, Griebel J, Fink C, Kiessling F. Estimation of tissue perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging: simulation-based evaluation of the steepest slope method. Eur Radiol 2010 Apr 21;20(9):2166-75.
21. Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Hanssens M. The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies. Placenta 2005 Dec 31;27(9-10): 939-58.
22. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991 Feb;17(2):357-67.
23. Yang X, Liang J, Heverhagen JT, Jia G, Schmalbrock P, Sammet S, et al. Improving the pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI by use of the arterial input function: theory and clinical application. Magn Reson Med 2008 Jun;59(6):1448-56.