Effectiveness of different visual biofeedback signals for human balance improvement

Gait and Posture

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 410-414

  Halická, Zuzana ^a   Lobotková, Jana ^a   Bučková, Kristína ^a   Hlavačka, František ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Body segment; Centre of pressure; Postural control; Visual biofeedback

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY SURFACE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROMETRY; STANDING; VISUAL BIOFEEDBACK; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ACCELEROMETER; BODY SEGMENT; CENTRE OF PRESSURE; POSTURAL CONTROL; VISUAL BIOFEEDBACK;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POSTURAL BALANCE; PRESSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888305537     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Rougier P., Farenc I., Berger L. Modifying the gain of the visual feedback affects undisturbed upright stance control. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004, 19(8):858-867.
2. Abrahámová D., Mancini M., Hlavacka F., Chiari L. The age-related changes of trunk responses to Achilles tendon vibration. Neurosci Lett 2009, 467(3):220-224.
3. Giansanti D., Dozza M., Chiari L., Maccioni G., Cappello A. Energetic assessment of trunk postural modifications induced by a wearable audio-biofeedback system. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31(1):48-54.
4. Pinsault N., Vuillerme N. The effects of scale display of visual feedback on postural control during quiet standing in healthy elderly subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89(9):1772-1774.
5. Rougier P. Visual feedback induces opposite effects on elementary centre of gravity and centre of pressure minus centre of gravity motions in undisturbed upright stance. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003, 18(4):341-349.
6. Dozza M., Chiari L., Peterka R.J., Wall C., Horak F.B. What is the most effective type of audio-biofeedback for postural motor learning?. Gait Posture 2011, 34(3):313-319.
7. Vuillerme N., Bertrand R., Pinsault N. Postural effects of the scaled display of visual foot center of pressure feedback under different somatosensory conditions at the foot and the ankle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:2034-2036.
8. Cawsey R.P., Chua R., Carpenter M.G., Sanderson D.J. To what extent can increasing the magnification of visual feedback of the centre of pressure position change the control of quiet standing balance. Gait Posture 2009, 29:280-284.
9. Litvinenkova V., Hlavacka F. The visual feed-back gain influence upon the regulation of the upright posture in man. Agressologie 1973, 14(Spec No C):95-99.
10. Hlavačka F., Šaling M. Compensation effect of visual biofeedback in upright posture control. Activ Nerv Sup 1986, 3:191-196.
11. Freitas S.M., Duarte M. Joint coordination in young and older adults during quiet stance: effect of visual feedback of the center of pressure. Gait Posture 2012, 35(1):83-87.
12. Carpenter M.G., Frank J.S., Silcher C.P., Peysar G.W. The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance. Exp Brain Res 2001, 138(2):210-218.
13. Abrahámová D., Hlavačka F. Age-related changes of human balance during quiet stance. Physiol Res 2008, 57:957-964.
14. Halická Z., Lobotková J., Bzdúšková D., Hlavačka F. Age-related changes in postural responses to backward platform translation. Physiol Res 2012, 61(3):331-335.
15. Krizková M., Hlavacka F., Gatev P. Visual control of human stance on a narrow and soft support surface. Physiol Res 1993, 42(4):267-272.
16. Duarte M., Zatsiorsky V.M. Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance. Exp Brain Res 2002, 146(1):60-69.
17. Dozza M., Chiari L., Chan B., Rocchi L., Horak F.B., Cappello A. Influence of a portable audio-biofeedback device on structural properties of postural sway. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005, 2:13.