Sowing ratio and N fertilization affect yield and yield components of oat and pea in intercrops

Field Crops Research

Volumn 155, Issue , 2014, Pages 159-163

  Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W ^a   Kaul, Hans Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Intercropping; Oat; Pea; Yield; Yield components

Indexed keywords

ARABLE FARMING; ASSESSMENT METHOD; CEREAL; CROP YIELD; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; HARVESTING; INTERCROPPING; LEGUME; NITROGEN; SOWING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

AUSTRIA;

AVENA SATIVA; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 84888294922     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arduini I., Masoni A., Ercoli L., Mariotti M. Grain yield, and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 25:309-318.
2. Anil L., Park J., Phipps R.H., Miller F.A. Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci. 1998, 53:301-317.
3. Aufhammer W., Kübler E., Piepho H.-P. Cereals and grain legumes as components of mixed stands - 1st communication: mixing effects on grain yield. Pflanzenbauwiss 2004, 8:56-63.
4. Bedoussac L., Justes E. A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: application to durum wheat-winter pea intercrops. Field Crop Res. 2011, 124:25-36.
5. Begna S.H., Fielding D.J., Tsegaye T., van Veldhuizen R., Angadi S., Smith D.L. Intercropping of oat and field pea in Alaska: an alternative approach to quality forage production and weed control. Acta Agric. Scand. B: Soil Plant Sci. 2011, 61:235-244.
6. Biabani A. Agronomic performance of intercropped wheat cultivars. Asian J. Plant. Sci. 2009, 8:78-81.
7. 15N isotope dilution technique. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1993, 15:39-44.
8. 2 fixation, leaf expansion and crop growth in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 2006, 282:195-208.
9. Darwinkel A. Ear development and formation of grain yield in winter wheat. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 1980, 28:156-163.
10. Das A.K., Khaliq Q.A., Haider M.L. Effect of intercropping on growth and yield in wheat-lentil and wheat-chickpea intercropping system at different planting configurations. J. Innov. Dev. Strategy 2011, 5:125-137.
11. Donaldson E., Schillinger W.F., Dofing S.M. Straw production and grain yield relationships in winter wheat. Crop Sci. 2001, 41:100-106.
12. Egli D.B., Bruening W.P. Source-sink relationship, seed sucrose levels and seed growth rates in soybean. Ann. Bot. 2001, 88:235-242.
13. Fletcher A.L., Jamieson P.D. Causes of variation in the rate of increase of wheat harvest index. Field Crop Res. 2009, 113:268-273.
14. Geisler G. Ertragsphysiologie von Kulturarten des gemäßigten Klimas 1983, 205. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.
15. Ghaley B.B., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Høgh-Jensen H., Jensen E.S. Intercropping of wheat and pea as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2005, 73:201-212.
16. Halvorson A.D., Nielsen D.C., Reule C.A. Nitrogen fertilization and rotation effects on no-till dryland wheat production. Agron. J. 2004, 96:1196-1201.
17. Itoh H., Ueno K., Yamazaki K. Effect of the interaction between cultural condition and genotype on spike morphogenesis in spring wheat. Plant Prod. Sci. 1998, 1:56-61.
18. 2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 1996, 182:25-38.
19. Kemanian A.R., Stöckle C.O., Huggins D.R., Viega L.M. A simple method to estimate harvest index in grain crops. Field Crop Res. 2007, 103:208-216.
20. Kübler E., Aufhammer W., Piepho H.-P. Mixing effects in cereal-grain legume stands on the composition of the above ground dry matter yield and the grain yield in dependence of the mixing ratio. Bodenkultur 2008, 59:85-94.
21. Lauk R., Lauk E. Pea-oat intercrops are superior to pea-wheat and pea-barley intercrops. Acta Agric. Scand. B: Soil Plant Sci. 2008, 58:139-144.
22. 2 fixation of faba bean. Plant Soil 2009, 323:295-308.
23. Lithourgidis A.S., Vlachostergios D.N., Dordas C.A., Damalas C.A. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. Eur. J. Agron. 2011, 34:287-294.
24. Liu X., Herbert S.J., Baath K., Hashemi A.M. Soybean (Glycine max) seed growth characteristics in response to light enrichment and shading. Plant Soil Environ. 2006, 52:178-185.
25. Mead R., Wiley W.R. The concept of land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields from intercropping. Exp. Agric. 1980, 16:217-228.
26. Micek P., Kulig B., Woźnica P., Sajdak A. The nutritive value for ruminants of faba bean (Vicia faba) seeds and naked oat (Avena nuda) grain cultivated in an organic farming system. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2012, 21:773-786.
27. Musa M., Leitch M.H., Iqbal M., Sahi F.U.H. Spatial arrangement affects growth characteristics of barley-pea intercrops. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12:685-690.
28. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jarvinen P. Seeding rate effects on tillering, grain yield, and yield components of oat at high latitude. Field Crop Res. 1995, 40:49-56.
29. Puckridge D.W. Competition for light and its effect on leaf and spikelet development of wheat plants. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1968, 19:191-201.
30. Rauber R., Schmidtke K., Kimpel-Freund H. The performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and its role in determining yield advantages in mixed stands of pea and oat (Avena sativa L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2001, 187:137-144.
31. Šarunaite L., Deveikyte I., Arlauskiene A., Kadžiuliene Ž., Maikšteniene S. Pea and spring cereal intercropping systems: advantages and suppression of broad-leaved weeds. Pol. J. Environ. Study 2013, 22:541-551.
32. Zbíral J. Determination of phosphorus in calcareous soils by Mehlich 3 Mehlich 2 CAL and Egner extractants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2000, 31:3037-3048.