An effect size filter improves the reproducibility in spectral counting-based comparative proteomics

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 95, Issue , 2013, Pages 55-65

  Gregori, Josep ^a,b   Villarreal, Laura ^a   Sánchez, Alex ^b,c   Baselga, José ^a   Villanueva, Josep ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

Author keywords

EdgeR; Effect size; Feature filters; Poisson; QSpec; Quasi likelihood

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; EFFECT SIZE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EDGER; EFFECT SIZE; FEATURE FILTERS; POISSON; QSPEC; QUASI-LIKELIHOOD;

PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84888289455     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Marshall E. Getting the noise out of gene arrays. Science 2004, 306:630-631.
2. Ein-Dor L., Zuk O., Domany E. Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:5923-5928.
3. Shi L., Campbell G., Jones W.D., Campagne F., Wen Z., Walker S.J., et al. MAQC Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:827-838.
4. Shi L., Jones W.D., Jensen R.V., Harris S.C., Perkins R.G., Goodsaid F.M., et al. The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl. 9):S10.
5. Luo J., Schumacher M., Scherer A., Sanoudou D., Megherbi D., Davison T., et al. A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data. Pharmacogenomics J 2010, 10:278-291.
6. Gregori J., Villarreal L., Méndez O., Sanchez A., Baselga J., Villanueva J. Batch effects correction improves the sensitivity of significance tests in spectral counting-based comparative discovery proteomics. J Proteomics 2012, 1-14.
7. Pounds S., Cheng C. Statistical development and evaluation of microarray gene expression data filters. J Comput Biol 2005, 12:482-495.
8. Bourgon R., Gentleman R., Huber W. Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107:9546-9551.
9. van Iterson M., Boer J.M., Menezes R.X. Filtering, FDR and power. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:450.
10. Choi H., Fermin D., Nesvizhskii A.I. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:2373-2385.
11. Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data 2010, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
12. Li M., Gray W., Zhang H., Chung C.H., Billheimer D., Yarbrough W.G., et al. Comparative shotgun proteomics using spectral count data and quasi-likelihood modeling. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:4295-4305.
13. Robinson M.D., McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:139-140.
14. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
15. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2007, Vienna, Austria, [ISBN 3-900051-07-0].
16. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1995, 57:289-300.
17. Søreide K. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. J Clin Pathol 2009, 62:1-5.