How well do standard stroke outcome measures reflect quality of life?: A retrospective analysis of clinical trial data

Stroke

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3161-3165

  Ali, Myzoon ^a,b   Fulton, Rachael ^b   Quinn, Terry ^b   Brady, Marian ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barthel Index; Modified Rankin Scale; Outcome; Quality of life; Stroke; Trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONVALESCENCE; EUROPEAN QUALITY OF LIFE SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANKIN SCALE; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; STROKE IMPACT SCALE; STROKE PATIENT; SURVIVOR;

BARTHEL INDEX; MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE; OUTCOME; QUALITY OF LIFE; STROKE; TRIAL;

AGED; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84888288008     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001126     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bendz M. The first year of rehabilitation after stroke from two perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci. 2003;17:215-222.
2. Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Goldstein LB, Bonito A, Witter DM, et al. Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:740-745.
3. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation of use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:603-612.
4. Addington-Hall J, Kalra L. Who should measure quality of life? BMJ. 2001;322:1417-1420.
5. Lees KR, Bath PM, Schellinger PD, Kerr DM, Fulton R, Hacke W, et al; European Stroke Organization Outcomes Working Group. Contemporary outcome measures in acute stroke research: choice of primary outcome measure. Stroke. 2012;43:1163-1170.
6. Saver JL, Warach S, Janis S, Odenkirchen J, Becker K, Benavente O, et al. Standardizing the structure of stroke clinical and epidemiologic research data: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Stroke Common Data Element (CDE) Project. Stroke. 2012;43:967-73.
7. Ali M, Bath P, Brady M, Davis S, Diener H-C, Donnan G, et al. Development, expansion and use of a stroke clinical trials resource for novel exploratory analyses. Int J Stroke. 2012;7:133-138.
8. About EQ-5D. EuroQol Group Web site. http://www.euroqol.org/abouteq-5d. html. Accessed October 24, 2011.
9. Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1538-1541.
10. Kimura K, Iguchi Y, Shibazaki K, Terasawa Y, Inoue T, Uemura J, et al. Large ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging done before intravenous tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis predicts a poor outcome in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:2388-2391.
11. McArthur K, Beagan ML, Degnan A, Howarth RC, Mitchell KA, McQuaige FB, et al. Properties of proxy derived modified Rankin Scale assessment. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:403-407.
12. Weimar C, Kurth T, Kraywinkel K, Wagner M, Busse O, Haberl RL, et al. Assessment of functioning and disability after ischaemic stroke. Stroke. 2002;33:2053-2059.
13. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
14. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:1091-1096.
15. Quinn TJ, Lees KR, Hardemark HG, Dawson J, Walters MR. Initial experience of a digital training resource for modified Rankin scale assessment in clinical trials. Stroke. 2007;38:2257-2261.
16. Zhao H, Collier JM, Quah DM, Purvis T, Bernhardt J. The modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke has good inter-rater-reliability but questionable validity. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:188-193.
17. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Exploring the reliability of the modified rankin scale. Stroke. 2009;40:762-766.
18. Pinto EB, Maso I, Vilela RN, Santos LC, Oliveira-Filho J. Validation of the EuroQol quality of life questionnaire on stroke victims. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69:320-323.
19. Lai SM, Perera S, Duncan PW, Bode R. Physical and social functioning after stroke: comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36. Stroke. 2003;34:488-493.
20. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke. 2009;4:200-205.
21. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Rapp K, Emr M, Warrern M, et al. Reliability of NIHSS training and certification across multiple venues. Stroke. 2008;39:598.
22. NINDS Common Data Elements. http://www.commondataelements. ninds.nih.gov/Stroke.aspx ab=Data-Standards. Accessed November 8, 2012.
23. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, Perera S, De Rosa J. Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology. 2003;60:291-296.
24. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S; Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950-963.
25. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33:1840-1844.
26. Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201-211.
27. Carod-Artal FJ, Ferreira Coral L, Stieven Trizotto D, Menezes Moreiera C. Self- and proxy-report agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2009;40:3308-3314.
28. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887.
29. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH, Shuaib A, Carriere KC, Nasser AM. Agreement between patient and proxy assessments of health-related quality of life after stroke using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Stroke. 2004;35:607-612.