Integrated modeling of software product lines with feature models and classification trees

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 557, Issue , 2009, Pages 36-43

  Oster, Sebastian ^a   Markert, Florian ^a   Scḧurr, Andy ^a   M̈uller, Werner ^b  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b ADAM OPEL AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION TREES; FEATURE MODELING; INTEGRATED MODELING; ORIGINAL SYSTEMS; REUSABILITY OF SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE (SPLS); UNIFIED APPROACH;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; REUSABILITY; SOFTWARE TESTING; SPECIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84888212884     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. S. Alekseev, R. Tiede, and P. Tollk̈uhn, "Systematic approach for using the classification tree method for testing complex software-systems, " in SE'07: Proceedings of the 25th conference on IASTED. Anaheim, CA, USA: ACTA Press, 2007, pp. 261-266.
2. C. Amelunxen, A. K̈onigs, T. R̈otschke, and A. Scḧurr, "Adapting FUJABA for Building a Meta Modelling Framework, " in Proc. 1st International Fujaba Days, H. Giese and A. Z̈undorf, Eds., vol. tr-ri- 04-247, 10 2003, pp. 29-34.
3. T. Y. Chen, P. L. Poon, and T. H. Tse, "A new restructuring algorithm for the classification-tree method, " in STEP '99. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 1999, pp. 105-114.
4. P. Clements and L. Northrop, Software product lines: practices and patterns. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2001.
5. M. Conrad and A. Krupp, "An extension of the classification-tree method for embedded systems for the description of events." Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 3-11, 2006.
6. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. Eisenecker, "Staged configuration through specialization and multilevel configuration of feature models, " Software Process: Improvement and Practice, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 143- 169, 2005.
7. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. Eisenecker, "Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization, " in Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 2005, pp. 7- 29.
8. K. Czarnecki, S. She, and A. Wasowski, "Sample spaces and feature models: There and back again, " in SPLC '08. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 22-31.
9. K. Czarnecki and A. Wasowski, "Feature diagrams and logics: There and back again, " in SPLC '07. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 23-34.
10. G. E. F. (GEF). [Online]. Available: http://www.eclipse.org/gef/.
11. M. Grochtmann and K. Grimm, "Classification trees for partition testing, " Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, vol. 1993, pp. 63-82, 1993.
12. M. Janota and J. Kiniry, "Reasoning about feature models in higherorder logic, " in SPLC '07. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 13-22.
13. B. D. Jules White and D. C. Schmidt, "Selecting highly optimal architectural feature sets with filtered cartesian flattening, " Journal of Systems and Software to appear.
14. K. C. Kang, S. G. Cohen, J. A. Hess, W. E. Novak, and A. S. Peterson, "Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study, " Carnegie- Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, Tech. Rep., November 1990.
15. K. R. P. H. Leung and W. Wong, "Towards a more efficient way of generating test cases: Class graphs, " in APAQS '00: Proceedings of the The First Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software (APAQS'00). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2000, pp. 285-293.
16. S. L̈utzkendorf and K. Bothe, "Attributierte Klassifikationsb̈aume zur Testdatenbestimmung, " Softwaretechnik- Trends, vol. 23, no. 1, 2003.
17. J. D. McGregor, "Testing a software product line, " Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI- 2001-TR-022, 2001.
18. A. Metzger, K. Pohl, P. Heymans, P.-Y. Schobbens, and G. Saval, "Disambiguating the documentation of variability in software product lines: A separation of concerns, formalization and automated analysis, " in RE '07. 15th IEEE International, 2007, pp. 243-253.
19. E. M. Olimpiew and H. Gomaa, "Model-based testing for applications derived from software product lines, " in A-MOST '05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 1-7.
20. S. Oster and A. Scḧurr, "Architekturgetriebenes Pairwise-Testing f̈ur Software-Produktlinien, " in Workshop SE '09: Produkt-Variabiliẗat im gesamten Lebenszyklus, March 2009.
21. K. Pohl, G. B̈ockle, and F. J. v. d. Linden, Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2005.
22. K. Pohl and A. Metzger, "Software product line testing, " Commun. ACM, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 78-81, 2006.
23. pure::systems. [Online]. Available: http://www.pure-systems.com.
24. S. Reis, A. Metzger, and K. Pohl, "Integration testing in software product line engineering: A model-based technique, " in FASE, 2007, pp. 321- 335.
25. A. Reuys, E. Kamsties, K. Pohl, and S. Reis, "Model-based system testing of software product families, " in CAiSE, 2005, pp. 519-534.
26. K. Scheidemann, "Verifying families of system configurations, " Doctoral Thesis, vol. TU Munich, 2007.
27. I. Sẗurmer, H. D̈orr, H. Giese, U. Kelter, A. Scḧurr, and A. Z̈undorf, "Das MATE Projekt visuelle Spezifikation von MATLAB Simulink/Stateflow Analysen und Transformationen, " Dagstuhl Seminar Modellbasierte Entwicklung eingebetteter Systeme, Januar 2007.
28. A. Tevanlinna, J. Taina, and R. Kauppinen, "Product family testing: A survey, " ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes., vol. 29, pp. 12- 12, 2004.