How do fertilizer subsidy programs affect total fertilizer use in sub-Saharan Africa? Crowding out, diversion, and benefit/cost assessments

Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 687-703

  Jayne, T S ^a   Mather, David ^a   Mason, Nicole ^a   Ricker Gilbert, Jacob ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Crowding out; Fertilizer; Input subsidies; Sub Saharan Africa

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; NATIONAL PLANNING; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SUBSIDY SYSTEM;

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84888200938     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: 15740862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/agec.12082     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Argwings-Kodhek, G., Jayne, T., Nyambane, G., Awuor, T., Yamano, T., 1998. How can micro-level household survey data make a difference for agricultural policy making? Egerton University/Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development, Nairobi. Accessed March 2013, available at http://www.tegemeo.org/viewdocument.asp?ID=28
2. Banful, A., 2011. Old problems in the new solutions? Politically motivated allocation of program benefits and the "new" fertilizer subsidies. World Dev, 39(7), 1166-1176.
3. Banful, A., Nkonya, E., Oboh, V., 2010. Constraints to fertilizer use in Nigeria: Insights from agricultural extension service. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01010. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
4. Brooks, J., Dyer, G., Taylor, E., 2008. Modelling agricultural trade and policy impacts in less developed countries. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers 11.
5. Burke, W.J., 2012. Maize production in Zambia and regional marketing: Input productivity and output price transmission. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed March 2013, available at http://www.aec.msu.edu/theses/fulltext/burke_phd.pdf.
6. Burke, W.J., Jayne, T.S., Sitko, N.J., 2012. Can the FISP more effectively achieve food production and poverty reduction goals? Food Security Research Project Policy Synthesis No. 51. Accessed March 2013, available at http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/ps_51.pdf.
7. Chamberlain, G., 1984. Panel data. In Grilliches, Z., Intriligator, M.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2, North Holland, Amsterdam.
8. Chang, E., 2005. Electoral incentives for political corruption under open-list proportional systems. J. Polit. 67(3).
9. Cragg, J., 1971. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica 39(5), 829-844.
10. Central Statistical Office (CSO), 2012. Retail Price Database. CSO, Lusaka, Zambia.
11. Cutler, D.M., Gruber, J., 1996. Does public insurance crowd out private insurance? Quart. J. Econ. 111(2), 391-430.
12. Dorward, A., Chirwa, E., 2011. The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/2006 to 2008/2009. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 16, 232-247.
13. Dorward, A., Chirwa, E., Kelly, V., Jayne, T.S., Slater, R., Boughton, D., 2008. Evaluation of the 2006/2007 agricultural input subsidy programme, Malawi. Final Report for DfID, Lilongwe, Malawi.
14. Easterly, W., 2006. White Man's Burden. Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. Penguin Press, New York.
15. Gittinger, J. P., 1982. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects. 2nd Ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
16. Holden, S., Lunduka, R., 2013. Who benefit from Malawi's targeted farm input subsidy program? Forum Dev. Stud. 40(1), doi:10.1080/08039410.2012.688858.
17. Jayne, T.S., Rashid, S., 2013. Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis of recent evidence. Agric. Econ. 44(6), 547-562.
18. Kronick, R., Gilmer, T., 2002. Insuring low-income adults: Does public coverage crowd out private? Health Affair. 21(1), 225-239.
19. Lewbel, A., 2004. Simple estimators for hard problems: Endogeneity in discrete choice related models. Unpublished paper, Boston College.
20. Liverpool-Tasie, S., 2012. Targeted subsidies and private market participation: An assessment of fertilizer demand in Nigeria. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01194, IFPRI, Washington, DC.
21. Liverpool, T., Takeshima, H., 2013. Moving forward with fertilizer in Nigeria: Fertilizer promotion strategies within a complex fertilizer subsector. Agric. Econ. 44(6), forthcoming.
22. LOG Associates, 2011. National Accelerated Agricultural Inputs Access Program (NAAIP): Program Evaluation. LOG Associates, Nairobi, Kenya.
23. Logistics Unit, Malawi. (2005-2012). Annual input subsidy implementation reports. Logistics Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
24. Lunduka, R., Ricker-Gilbert, J., Fisher, M., 2013. What are the farm-level impacts of Malawi's Farm Input Subsidy Program? A critical review. Agric. Econ. 44(6), 563-579.
25. MAL, 2012. Farmer Input Support Programme Implementation Manual, 2012/2013 Agricultural Season. MAL, Lusaka, Zambia.
26. Mason, N. Jayne, T., 2013. Fertilizer subsidies & smallholder commercial fertilizer purchases: Crowding out, leakage, & policy implications for Zambia. J. Agric. Econ. 64(3), 558-582.
27. Mason, N.M., Jayne, T.S., Mofya-Mukuka, R., 2013. Zambia's input subsidy programs. Agric. Econ. 44(6), forthcoming.
28. Mather, D. Jayne, T., 2013. Fertilizer subsidies and the role of targeting criteria in crowding-out: An assessment of smallholder fertilizer demand in Kenya. International Development Working Paper, Michigan State University, East Lansing (forthcoming).
29. Minde, I., Jayne, T.S., Crawford, E., Ariga, J., Govereh, J., 2008. Promoting fertilizer use in Africa: Current issues and empirical evidence from Malawi, Zambia, and Kenya. Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa. (ReSAKSS) Working Paper No. 13. ReSAKSS, Pretoria, South Africa.
30. Ministry of Agriculture. (2005-2012). Retail Food Price Database. Ministry of Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya.
31. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MACO). (2005-2012). Fertilizer Support Programme Implementation Manuals. MACO, Lusaka, Zambia.
32. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (MAFS). (2005-2012). Retail Price Database. MAFS, Lilongwe, Malawi.
33. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAL). (2005-2012). Farmer Input Support Programme Implementation Manuals. MAL, Lusaka, Zambia.
34. Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MFNP), (2005-2012). Estimates of Revenue and Expenditure: Activity Based Budget. Government Printer, Lusaka, Zambia.
35. Morris, M., Kelly, V.A., Kopicki, R.J., Byerlee, D., 2007. Fertilizer Use in African Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Good Practice Guidelines. World Bank, Washington, DC.
36. Mundlak, Y., 1978. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46, 69-85.
37. NAAIAP., 2010. Progress and Way Forward for the National Accelerated Agricultural Inputs Access Program (NAAIAP). Ministry of Agriculture, Republic of Kenya.
38. NCPB., 2013. Powerpoint Presentation by NCPB Official. Nairobi.
39. Nyirongo, C., 2005. Do free inputs crowd out the private sector in agricultural input markets? In Levy, S. (Ed.), Starter Packs: A Strategy to Fight Hunger in Developing Countries? CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
40. Ricker-Gilbert, J., 2013. Wage and employment effects of Malawi's fertilizer subsidy program. Agric. Econ. (forthcoming).
41. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T.S., Forthcoming. Looking beyond the mean: Estimating the impacts of Malawi's fertilizer subsidy program using quantile regression. International Development Working Paper, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
42. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T.S. Chirwa, E., 2011. Subsidies and crowding out: A double-hurdle model of fertilizer demand in Malawi. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 93(1), 26-42.
43. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Mason, N., Darko, F., Tembo, S., 2013. What are the effects of input subsidy programs on maize prices? Evidence from Malawi and Zambia. Agric. Econ. 44(6), 671-686.
44. Rivers, D. Vuong, Q.H., 1988. Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. J. Econom. 39, 347-366.
45. Sheahan, M., Black, R., Jayne, T.S., 2013. Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for intensification strategies and research. Food Pol. 41, 39-52.
46. Sistema de Informação de Mercados Agrícolas (SIMA). (2005-2012). Retail Price Database. Ministry of Agriculture, Maputo, Mozambique.
47. Smith, R.J., Blundell, R.W., 1986. An exogeneity test for a simultaneous equation tobit model with and application to the labor supply. Econometrica 50(3), 679-685.
48. Spencer, R.W., Yohe, W.P., 1970. The "crowding out" of private expenditures by fiscal policy actions. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 10, 12-24.
49. Takeshima, H. Liverpool-Tasie, S., 2013. Fertilizer subsidy, political influence and local food price in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria. Paper Presented at the 2013 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meetings, 4-6 August 2013, Washington DC.
50. Takeshima, H., Nkonya, E., Deb, S., 2012. Impact of fertilizer subsidies on the commercial fertilizer sector in Nigeria evidence from previous fertilizer subsidy schemes. Working Paper 23, Nigeria Strategy Support Program-II, International Food Policy Research Institute, Abuja, Nigeria.
51. Vella, F., 1993. A simple estimator for simultaneous models with censored endogenous regressors. Int. Econ. Rev. 34(2), 441-457.
52. Wooldridge, J.W., 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. World Bank., 2007. World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington, DC.
54. World Bank., 2010. Impact assessment of the fertilizer support programme, analysis of effectiveness and efficiency: Zambia. World Bank Sustainable Development Department Report No. 54864ZM. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
55. Xu, Z., Burke, W.J., Jayne, T.S., Govereh, J., 2009. Do input subsidy programs "crowd in" or "crowd out" commercial market development? Modeling fertilizer demand in a two-channel marketing system. Agric. Econ. 40(1), 79-94.