Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1091-1098

  Moon, Woo Kyung ^a   Lo, Chung Ming ^b   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Huang, Chiun Sheng ^c   Chen, Jeon Hor ^d   Chang, Ruey Feng ^b  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Breast cancer; Computer assisted diagnosis; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FEATURES; AREA UNDER THE CURVES; BI-RADS; BINARY LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS; BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PARTIAL DISCHARGES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEXTURES; ULTRASONICS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TAIWAN; TUMOR INVASION;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TAIWAN; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84888200859     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196:123-134, 1995
2. American College of Radiology Ed.: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, 2003
3. Berg WA: Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 42:845-851, 2004
4. Sickles EA: Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses - likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 192:439-442, 1994
5. Leung JW, Sickles EA: The probably benign assessment. Radiol Clin North Am 45:773-789, 2007
6. Berg WA, et al: Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 299:2151-2163, 2008
7. Gruber R, Jaromi S, Rudas M, Pfarl G, Riedl CC, Flöry D, Graf O, Sickles EA, Helbich TH: Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3). Eur J Radiol 82:398-403, 2013
8. Kim SJ, Chang JM, Cho N, Chung SY, Han W, Moon WK: Outcome of breast lesions detected at screening ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 81:3229-3233, 2012
9. Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA: Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244:87-93, 2007
10. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS: BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239:385-391, 2006
11. Lee HJ, et al: Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 65:293-298, 2008
12. Jesneck JL, Lo JY, Baker JA: Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors. Radiology 244:390-398, 2007
13. Shen WC, Chang RF, Moon WK, Chou YH, Huang CS: Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad Radiol 14:928-939, 2007
14. Shen WC, Chang RF, Moon WK: Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Ultrasound Med Biol 33:1688-1698, 2007
15. Kim KG, Cho SW, Min SJ, Kim JH, Min BG, Bae KT: Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses. Acad Radiol 12:58-66, 2005
16. Jiang YL, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Giger ML, Doi K: Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 6:22-33, 1999
17. Drukker K, Giger ML, Metz CE: Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology 237:834-840, 2005
18. Moon WK, Lo CM, Huang CS, Chen JH, Chang RF: Computer-aided diagnosis based on speckle patterns in ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1251-1261, 2012
19. Moon WK, Lo CM, Chang JM, Huang CS, Chen JH, Chang RF: Computer-aided classification of breast masses using speckle features of automated breast ultrasound images. Med Phys 39:6465-6473, 2012
20. Moon WK, Chang SC, Huang CS, Chang RF: Breast tumor classification using fuzzy clustering for breast elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:700-708, 2011
21. Nie K, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su MY: Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol 15:1513-1525, 2008
22. Rangayyan RM, Mudigonda NR, Desautels JEL: Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:487-496, 2000
23. Haralick RM, Shanmuga K, Dinstein I: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Smc 3:610-621, 1973
24. Hosmer DW: Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, 2000
25. Field AP: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edition. SAGE, Los Angeles, 2009
26. Schrading S, Kuhl CK: Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology 246:58-70, 2008
27. Bae MS, et al: Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms. Cancer Sci 102:1862-1867, 2011
28. Rubin E: Six-month follow-up: an alternative view. Radiology 213:15-18, 1999
29. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Faroux MJ, Andry E: Sonographic appearance and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of breast carcinomas smaller than 1 cm3. J Ultrasound Med 9:559-568, 1990
30. Sahiner B, et al: Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 242:716-724, 2007