Subjective assessment methodology for preference of experience in 3DTV

2013 IEEE 11th IVMSP Workshop: 3D Image/Video Technologies and Applications, IVMSP 2013 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Li, Jing ^a   Barkowsky, Marcus ^a   Le Callet, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

3DTV; efficient methods; Paired comparison; Preference of Experience; Quality of Experience

Indexed keywords

3DTV; EFFICIENT METHODS; PAIRED COMPARISON; PREFERENCE OF EXPERIENCE; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE);

QUALITY OF SERVICE; VIDEO CAMERAS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84888173468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IVMSPW.2013.6611917     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. W. Chen, F. Jérôme, M. Barkowsky, and P. Le Callet, "Explo- ration of Quality of Experience of stereoscopic images: Binoc- ular depth," International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, pp. 1-6, Jan. 2012.
2. P. Le Callet, S.Möller, and A. Perkis, "Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience (2012)," Tech. Rep. version 1.1, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multime- dia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), Lausanne, Switzerland, June 2012.
3. ITU-R BT.2021, "Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3dtv systems," International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
4. ITU-R BT.500-11, "Methodology for the subjective assess- ment of the quality of television pictures," International T- elecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
5. ITU-T P.910, "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," International Telecommunica- tion Union, 1999.
6. R.A. Bradley, "14 Paired comparisons: Some basic procedures and examples," Handbook of statistics, vol. 4, pp. 299-326, 1984.
7. L.L. Thurstone, "A law of comparative judgment.," Psycho- logical review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 273, 1927.
8. J. Li, M. Barkowsky, and P. Le Callet, "Analysis and im- provement of a paired comparison method in the application of 3DTV subjective experiment," in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2012), 2012, pp. 1-4.
9. J. Li, M. Barkowsky, and P. Le Callet, "Boosting Paired Com- parison methodology in measuring visual discomfort of 3DTV: performances of three different designs," Proc. SPIE Elec- tronic Imaging-Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIV, 2013.
10. O. Dykstra, "Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: A method of paired comparisons employing unequal repetitions on pairs," Biometrics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 176-188, 1960.
11. J. Li, M. Barkowsky, and P. Le Callet, "The influence of rela- tive disparity and planar motion velocity on visual discomfort of stereoscopic videos," in The third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX2011). 2011, pp. 155-160, IEEE.
12. G. Barnard, "A new test for 2×2 tables," Nature, vol. 156:177, 1945.
13. John C. Handley, "Comparative Analysis of Bradley-Terry and Thurstone-Mosteller Paired Comparison Models for Im- age Quality Assessment," in Proc. IS&Ts Image Processing, Image Quality, Image Capture, Systems Conference, 1081, pp. 108-112.
14. A. Tversky and S. Sattath, "Preference trees," Psychological Review, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 542-573, Nov. 1979.
15. F. Wickelmaier and C. Schmid, "A matlab function to esti- mate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data," Behavior Research Methods, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 29-40, 2004.