Evaluating multimodal driver displays of varying urgency

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 92-99

  Politis, Ioannis ^a   Brewster, Stephen ^a   Pollick, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

audio; multimodal interaction; perceived annoyance; perceived urgency; recognition time; simulator; tactile; visual; warnings

Indexed keywords

AUDIO; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; PERCEIVED ANNOYANCE; PERCEIVED URGENCY; RECOGNITION TIME; TACTILE; VISUAL; WARNINGS;

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; SIMULATORS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84888162626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2516540.2516543     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. C. L. Baldwin, J. L. Eisert, A. Garcia, B. Lewis, S. M. Pratt, C. Gonzalez. 2012. Multimodal urgency coding: auditory, visual, and tactile parameters and their impact on perceived urgency. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 41, 1, 3586-3591.
2. S. A. Brewster, P. C. Wright, A. D. Edwards. 1993. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces. In Proceedings INTER CHI'93. ACM Press, 222-227.
3. D. Brumby, V. Seyedi. 2012. An empirical investigation into how users adapt to mobile phone auto-locks in a multitask setting. In MobileHCI 2012. ACM Press, 281-290.
4. Y. Cao, F. Van Der Sluis, M. Theune, A. Nijholt. 2010. Evaluating informative auditory and tactile cues for in-vehicle information systems. In Proceedings Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM Press, 102-109.
5. J. Edworthy, E. Hellier, K. Walters, B. Weedon, A. Adams. 2000. The Relationship between Task Performance, Reaction Time, and Perceived Urgency in Nonverbal Auditory Warnings. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, 674-677.
6. J. Edworthy, S. Loxley, I. Dennis. 1991. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 33, 2, 205-231.
7. C. Gonzalez, B. A. Lewis, D. M. Roberts, S. M. Pratt, C. L Baldwin, 2012. Perceived urgency and annoyance of auditory alerts in a driving context. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, 1684-1687.
8. C. Ho, C. Spence. 2005. Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 11, 3, 157.
9. C. Ho, N. Reed, C. Spence. 2007. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, 6, 1107-1114.
10. C. Ho, H. Z. Tan, C. Spence. 2005. Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8, 6, 397-412.
11. E. E. Hoggan, S. A. Brewster. 2006. Crossmodal icons for information display. In ACM CHI'06, ACM Press, 857-862.
12. E. Hoggan, R. Raisamo, S. A. Brewster. 2009. Mapping information to audio and tactile icons. In Proceedings of ACM ICMI 2009, ACM Press, 327-334.
13. Y. Huang, C. Tsai, J. Kuo, F. Wu. 2011. The Comparison of Different Sensory Outputs on the Driving Overtake Alarm System. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Context Diversity, 290-297.
14. C. Kaufmann, R. Risser, A. Geven, R. Sefelin. 2008. Effects of simultaneous multi-modal warnings and traffic information on driver behaviour. In Proceedings of European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems,33-42.
15. D. Kern, P. Marshall, E. Hornecker, Y. Rogers. 2009. Enhancing Navigation Information with Tactile Output Embedded into the Steering Wheel. In Pervasive 2009. Springer, 42-58.
16. B. A. Lewis, C. L. Baldwin. 2012. Equating Perceived Urgency Across Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Signals. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, 1307-1311.
17. D. C Marshall, J. D. Lee, P. A. Austria. 2007. Alerts for In-Vehicle Information Systems: Annoyance, Urgency, and Appropriateness. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, 1, 145-157.
18. D. McKeown, S. Isherwood, 2007. Mapping candidate with-in-vehicle auditory displays to their referents. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, 3, 417-428.
19. M. A. Mollenhauer, J. Lee, K. Cho, M. C. Hulse, T. A. Dingus. 1994. The effects of sensory modality and information priority on in-vehicle signing and information systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, 1072-1076.
20. A. Murata, M. Kanbayashi, T. Hayami. 2012. Effectiveness of automotive warning system presented with multiple sensory modalities. In Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference 2012. IEEE, 920-925.
21. S. M. Pratt, B. A. Lewis, B. N. Peñaranda, D. M. Roberts, C. Gonzalez, C. L. Baldwin. 2012. Perceived Urgency Scaling in Tactile Alerts. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, 1303-1306.
22. B. Saket, C. Prasojo, Y. Huang, S. Zhao. 2013. Designing an effective vibration-based notification interface for mobile phones. In Proceedings CSCW 2013. ACM Press, 149-1504.
23. J. J. Scott, R. Gray. 2008. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50 2, 264-275.
24. J. M. Sullivan, M. L. Buonarosa. 2009. Acquisition, response, and error rates with three suites of collision warning sounds. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 284-290.
25. J. B. Van Erp, H. A. Van Veen. 2004. Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 7, 4, 247-256.