A survey of noise reduction methods for distant supervision

AKBC 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Automated Knowledge Base Construction, Co-located with CIKM 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 73-77

  Roth, Benjamin ^a   Barth, Tassilo ^a   Wiegand, Michael ^a   Klakow, Dietrich ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

distant supervision; machine learning; relation extraction

Indexed keywords

DISTANT SUPERVISION; NOISE REDUCTION METHODS; PATTERN CORRELATION; RELATED WORKS; RELATION EXTRACTION; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SUPERVISION LEARNING; TOPIC-BASED MODEL;

EXTRACTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SURVEYS;

NOISE ABATEMENT;

EID: 84888144373     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2509558.2509571     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. E. Alfonseca, K. Filippova, J.-Y. Delort, and G. Garrido. Pattern learning for relation extraction with a hierarchical topic model. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers-Volume 2, pages 54-59. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012.
2. M. Banko, M. J. Cafarella, S. Soderland, M. Broadhead, and O. Etzioni. Open information extraction from the web. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2007.
3. J. Blitzer, M. Dredze, and F. Pereira. Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classi cation. In Annual Meeting-Association For Computational Linguistics, volume 45, page 440, 2007.
4. D. Downey, O. Etzioni, and S. Soderland. A probabilistic model of redundancy in information extraction. In IN IJCAI, pages 1034-1041, 2005.
5. A. Go, R. Bhayani, and L. Huang. Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford, pages 1-12, 2009.
6. A. Haghighi and L. Vanderwende. Exploring content models for multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 362-370. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
7. R. Hoffmann, C. Zhang, X. Ling, L. Zettlemoyer, and D. S. Weld. Knowledge-based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, volume 1, pages 541-550, 2011.
8. H. Ji and R. Grishman. Knowledge base population: Successful approaches and challenges. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, volume 1, pages 1148-1158, 2011.
9. W. Lin, R. Yangarber, and R. Grishman. Bootstrapped learning of semantic classes from positive and negative examples. In Proceedings of ICML-2003 Workshop on The Continuum from Labeled to Unlabeled Data, volume 1, page 21, 2003.
10. M. Mintz, S. Bills, R. Snow, and D. Jurafsky. Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2-Volume 2, pages 1003-1011. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
11. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, pages 79-86. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002.
12. M. Purver and S. Battersby. Experimenting with distant supervision for emotion classification. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 482-491. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012.
13. S. Riedel, L. Yao, and A. McCallum. Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 148-163. Springer, 2010.
14. B. Roth and D. Klakow. Feature-based models for improving the quality of noisy training data for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). ACM, 2013.
15. M. Surdeanu, J. Tibshirani, R. Nallapati, and C. D. Manning. Multi-instance multi-label learning for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 455-465. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012.
16. J. Suttles and N. Ide. Distant supervision for emotion classification with discrete binary values. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 121-136. Springer, 2013.
17. S. Takamatsu, I. Sato, and H. Nakagawa. Reducing wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers - Volume 1, ACL '12, pages 721-729, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2012. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. L. Yao, S. Riedel, and A. McCallum. Collective cross-document relation extraction without labelled data. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1013-1023. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.