Comparable flow cytometry data can be obtained with two types of instruments, Canto II, and Navios. A GEIL study

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 83, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1066-1072

  Solly, Françoise ^a   Rigollet, Lauren ^a   Baseggio, Lucille ^b   Guy, Julien ^c   Borgeot, Jessica ^c   Guérin, Estelle ^d   Debliquis, Agathe ^e   Drenou, Bernard ^e   Campos, Lydia ^d   Lacombe, Francis ^f   Béné, Marie C ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

^b HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^c DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d LIMOGES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e Hematology Laboratory   (France)

^f BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cross calibration; Multiparameter flow cytometry; PMS settings; harmonization

Indexed keywords

FC RECEPTOR; FCGR3B PROTEIN, HUMAN; FLUORESCENT DYE; GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL ANCHORED PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-CALIBRATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPARAMETER FLOW CYTOMETRY; NEUTROPHIL; PMS SETTINGS; HARMONIZATION; STAINING; STANDARD;

CROSS-CALIBRATION; MULTIPARAMETER FLOW CYTOMETRY; PMS SETTINGS; HARMONIZATION;

CALIBRATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT DYES; GPI-LINKED PROTEINS; HUMANS; NEUTROPHILS; RECEPTORS, IGG; REFERENCE STANDARDS; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 84888127916     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22404     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Gratama JW, Kraan J, Adriaansen H, Hooibrink B, Levering W, Reinders P, Van den Beemd MW, Van der Holt B, Bolhuis RL. Reduction of interlaboratory variability in flow cytometric immunophenotyping by standardization of instrument set-up and calibration, and standard list mode data analysis. Cytometry 1997;30:10-22.
2. Robert S, Poncelet P, Lacroix R, Arnaud L, Giraudo L, Hauchard A, Sampol J, Dignat-George F. Standardization of platelet-derived microparticle counting using calibrated beads and a Cytomics FC500 routine flow cytometer: a first step towards multicenter studies? J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:190-197.
3. Borowitz MJ, Shuster J, Carroll AJ, Nash M, Look AT, Camitta B, Mahoney D, Lauer SJ, Pullen DJ. Prognostic significance of fluorescence intensity of surface marker expression in childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Blood 1997;89:3960-3966.
4. Mittag A, Tárnok A. Basics of standardization and calibration in cytometry-a review. J Biophotonics 2009;2:470-481.
5. Béné MC, Nebe T, Bettelheim P, Buldini B, Bumbea H, Kern W, Lacombe F, Lemez P, Marinov I, Matutes E, et al. Immunophenotyping of acute leukemia and lymphoproliferative disorders: A consensus proposal of the European LeukemiaNet Work Package 10. Leukemia 2011;25:567-574.
6. Arnoulet C, Béné MC, Durrieu F, Feuillard J, Fossat C, Husson B, Jouault H, Maynadié M, Lacombe F. Four- and five-color flow cytometry analysis of leukocyte differentiation pathways in normal bone marrow: A reference document based on a systematic approach by the GTLLF and GEIL. Cytometry Part B Clin Cytom 2010;78B:4-10.
7. Kalina T, Flores-Montero J, van der Velden VH, Martin-Ayuso M, Böttcher S, Ritgen M, Almeida J, Lhermitte L, Asnafi V, Mendonça A, et al; EuroFlow Consortium (EU-FP6, LSHB-CT-2006-018708). EuroFlow standardization of flow cytometer instrument settings and immunophenotyping protocols. Leukemia 2012;26:1986-2010.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
9. Wang L, Gaigalas AK, Marti G, Abbasi F, Hoffman RA. Toward quantitative fluorescence measurements with multicolor flow cytometry. Cytometry Part A 2008;73A:279-288.