Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the NCDR®

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1091-1105

  Fazel, Reza ^a   Curtis, Jeptha ^b   Wang, Yongfei ^b   Einstein, Andrew J ^c   Smith Bindman, Rebecca ^d   Tsai, Thomas T ^e,f   Chen, Jersey ^b   Shah, Nilay D ^g   Krumholz, Harlan M ^b,h   Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ^e,i  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^g MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^h YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

CATH diagnostic cardiac catheterization; PCI percutaneous coronary intervention; RDA radiation physics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ATHERECTOMY; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; INVASIVE ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION SAFETY; REGISTER; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; THORAX PAIN; THROMBECTOMY; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; VASCULAR ACCESS;

CATH-DIAGNOSTIC CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; PCI-PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RDA-RADIATION PHYSICS;

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84888127055     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24996     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Magid D, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Schreiner PJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB,. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 127: e6-e245.
2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; March 2009.
3. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Einstein AJ, Nallamothu BK,. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 849-857.
4. Chen J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Nallamothu BK,. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: A population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 702-711.
5. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2008 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. Vol 1, Sources. New York, NY: United Nations, 2010.
6. den Boer A, de Feijter PJ, Serruys PW, Roelandt JR,. Real-time quantification and display of skin radiation during coronary angiography and intervention. Circulation 2001; 104: 1779-1784.
7. Pantos I, Patatoukas G, Katritsis DG, Efstathopoulos E,. Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009; 5: 1-11.
8. Bor D, Olgar T, Toklu T, Caglan A, Onal E, Padovani R,. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology. PhysMedica 2009; 25: 31-42.
9. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP Report No. 168, Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically-Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; July 2010.
10. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report 74. Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging. Bethesda, MD, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; September 2009.
11. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 1-332.
12. Prasad KN, Cole WC, Haase GM,. Radiation protection in humans: Extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 97-99.
13. Balter S,. Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Operational radiation safety. Catheter Cardio Inte 1999; 47: 347-353.
14. Bashore T,. Fundamentals of X-ray imaging and radiation safety. Catheter Cardio Inte 2001; 54: 126-135.
15. Weintraub WS, McKay CR, Riner RN, Ellis SG, Frommer PL, Carmichael DB, Hammermeister KE, Effros MN, Bost JE, Bodycombe DP,. The American College of Cardiology National Database: Progress and challenges. American College of Cardiology Database Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 459-465.
16. Brindis RG, Fitzgerald S, Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Weintraub WS, Williams JF,. The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): Building a national clinical data repository. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 2240-2245.
17. http://www.ncdr.com/WebNCDR/NCDRDocuments/datadictdefsonlyv30.pdf. Last accessed 12/12/11.
18. http://www.ncdr.com/WebNCDR/NCDRDocuments/CathPCI-v4-CodersDictionary-4. 4.pdf, last accessed 11/18/2011.
19. Austin PC, Tu JV, Alter DA,. Comparing hierarchical modeling with traditional logistic regression analysis among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: Should we be analyzing cardiovascular outcomes data differently? Am Heart J 2003; 145: 27-35.
20. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M,. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology 2008; 248: 254-263.
21. Einstein AJ,. Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: How good are the data? J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 553-565.
22. http://www.imagewisely.org/?CSRT=10794036780689157081, last accessed 12/5/11.
23. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP,. Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004; 231: 393-398.
24. Quinn AD, Taylor CG, Sabharwal T, Sikdar T,. Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 102-106.
25. Jorgensen JE, Rubenstein JH, Goodsitt MM, Elta GH,. Radiation doses to ERCP patients are significantly lower with experienced endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 58-65.
26. Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ, McCallister BD, Johnson LW, Arani DT, Guerci AD, Sosa J, Topol EJ,. Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA 1997; 277: 892-898.
27. McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Dickens JD Jr, Siewers AE, Lucas FL, Malenka DJ, Kellett MA Jr, Ryan TJ Jr,. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA 2000; 284: 3139-3144.
28. Kim E, McLoughlin M, Lam EC, Amar J, Byrne M, Telford J, Enns R,. Prospective analysis of fluoroscopy duration during ERCP: Critical determinants. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 50-57.
29. Hirshfeld JW Jr, Balter S, Brinker JA, Kern MJ, Klein LW, Lindsay BD, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Wagner LK, Creager MA, Elnicki M, Lorell BH, Rodgers GP, Weitz HH, American College of Cardiology F, American Heart A, Hrs, Scai, American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical C, Training. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. Circulation 2005; 111: 511-532.
30. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Performance standards for ionizing radiation emitting products. Fluoroscopic equipment, Air kerma rates," 21 CFR Part 1020.32(d) (revised April 1, 2011), http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm (accessed November 25, 2011) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington).