General and specific combining ability of male blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and female channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) for growth and carcass yield of their F1 hybrid progeny

Aquaculture

Volumn 420-421, Issue , 2014, Pages 147-153

  Bosworth, Brian ^a   Waldbieser, Geoff ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Catfish; Combining ability; Hybrid; Performance

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION; FISH CULTURE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GROWTH RATE; HARVESTING; HERITABILITY; HYBRID; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; WEIGHT;

UNITED STATES;

ICTALURUS; ICTALURUS FURCATUS; ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS;

EID: 84888096538     PISSN: 00448486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Argue B.J., Liu X., Dunham R.A. Dress-out and fillet yields of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatus, and their F1, F2 and backcross hybrids. Aquaculture 2003, 228:81-90.
2. Bondari K. Caudal fin abnormality and growth of channel catfish. Growth 1983, 47:361-370.
3. Bondari K., Dunham R.A. Effects of inbreeding on economic traits of channel catfish. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987, 74:1-9.
4. Bonnet E., Fostier A., Bobe J. Micorarray-based analysis of fish egg quality after natural or controlled ovulation. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:55.
5. Bosworth B.G. Effects of winter feeding on growth, body composition, and processing traits of co-cultured blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus), channel catfish (I. punctatus) and channel catfish×blue catfish hybrids. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2012, 74:553-559.
6. Bosworth B.G., Wolters W.R., Silva J.L., Chamul R.S., Park S. Comparison of production, meat yield, and meat quality traits of NWAC 103 line channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), Norris line channel catfish, and channel catfish female×blue catfish male (I. furcatus) F1 hybrids. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2004, 66:177-183.
7. Comstock R.E., Robinson H.F. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 1952, 41:360-367.
8. Cotterill P.P., Dean C.A., Van Wyk G. Additive and dominance genetic effects in Pinus pinaster, P. radiata and P. elliottii and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet. 1986, 36:221-231.
9. Dunham R.A., Argue B.J. Reproduction among channel catfish, blue catfish, and their F1 and F2 hybrids. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2000, 129:222-231.
10. Dunham R.A., Masser M. Production of Hybrid Catfish. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication Number 2012, 190.
11. Dunham R.A., Brummet R.E., Ella M.O., Smitherman R.O. Genotype-environment interactions for growth of blue, channel and hybrid catfish in ponds and cages at varying densities. Aquaculture 1990, 85:143-151.
12. Dunham R.A., Smitherman R.O., Bondari K. Lack of inheritance of stumpbody and taillessness in channel catfish. Prog. Fish Cult. 1991, 53:101-105.
13. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, 325. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow, England. 4th edition.
14. Gordon J. Quantitative genetics of intraspecies hybrids. Heredity 1999, 83:757-764.
15. Green B.W., Rawles S.D. Comparative growth and yield of channel catfish and channel×blue hybrid catfish fed a full or restricted ration. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41:109-119.
16. Habier D., Gotz K.-U., Dempfle L. Estimation of genetic parameters on test stations using purebred and crossbred progeny of sires of the Bavarian Pietrain. Livest. Sci. 2007, 107:142-151.
17. Hardman M., Hardman L.M. The relative importance of body size and paleoclimatic change as explanatory variables influencing lineage diversification rate: an evolutionary analysis of bullhead catfishes (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae). Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:116-130.
18. Henryon M., Jokumsen A., Berg P., Lund I., Pedersen P.B., Olesen N.J., Slierendrecht W.J. Genetic variation for growth rate, feed conversion efficiency and disease resistance exist within a farmed population of rainbow trout. Aquaculture 2002, 209:59-76.
19. Hohls T. Setting confidence limits to genetic parameters estimated by restricted maximum likelihood analysis of North Carolina design II experiment. Heredity 1996, 77:476-478.
20. Hörstgen-Schwark G., Fricke H., Langholz H.-J. The effect of strain crossing on the production performance in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 1986, 57:141-152.
21. Hu E., Yang H., Tiersch T.R. High-throughput cryopreservation of spermatozoa of blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus): establishment of an approach for commercial-scale processing. Cryobiology 2011, 62:74-82.
22. Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L., Marshall T.C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1099-1106.
23. Kerr R.J., Dieters M.J., Tier B., Dungey H.S. Simulations of hybrid forest tree breeding strategies. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34:195-208.
24. Legendre M., Slembrouck J., Subagja J., Kristanto A.H. Ovulation rate, latency period and ova viability after GnRH- or hCG-induced breeding in the Asian catfish Pangasius hypophthalmus (Siluriformes, Pangasiidae). Aquat. Living Resour. 2000, 13:145-151.
25. Li Y.-M., Chaney R.L., Schneiter A.A., Miller J.F. General combining ability and heterosis estimates for kernel cadmium level in sunflower. Crop Sci. 1995, 35:1015-1019.
26. Li M.H., Manning B.B., Robinson E.H., Yant R.D., Chatakondi N.G., Bosworth B.G., Wolters W.R. Comparison of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, (NWAC 103 strain) and the channel×blue catfish, I. punctatus×I. furcatus, F1 hybrid for growth, feed efficiency, processing yield, and body composition. J. Appl. Aquac. 2004, 15(3/4):63-71.
27. Lo L.L., Fernando R.L., Grossman M. Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75:2877-2884.
28. Lovell R.T. Essentiality of vitamin C in feeds for intensively fed caged channel catfish. J. Nutr. 1973, 103:134-138.
29. Lubzens E., Young G., Bobe J., Cerda J. Oogenesis in teleosts: how eggs are formed. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2010, 165:367-389.
30. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits 1998, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
31. Nakavisut S., Crump R., Suarez M., Graser H.-U. Genetic correlations between the performance of purebred and crossbred pigs. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2005, 16:99-102.
32. Newman S., Reverter A., Johnston D.J. Purebred-crossbred performance and genetic evaluation of postweaning growth and carcass traits in Bos indicus×Bos taurus crosses in Australia. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80:1801-1808.
33. Ooi C.S., Mukherjee T.K., Wong W.C., Syed J. General and specific combining abilities for different economic traits in broiler chickens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1975, 46:149-155.
34. Sahoo S.K., Giri S.S., Chandra S., Sahu A.K. Effect of Ovaprim doses and latency periods on induced spawning of Clarias batrachus: observation on larval deformity. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 45:920-922.
35. Saillant E., Dupont-Nivet M., Haffray P., Chatain B. Estimates of heritability and genotype-environment interactions for body weight in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) raised under communal rearing conditions. Aquaculture 2006, 254:139-147.
36. Schrag T., Mohring A., Maurer H.P., Dhillon B.S., Melchinger A.E., Piepho H.-P., Sorenson A.P., Frisch M. Molecular marker-based prediction of hybrid performance in maize using unbalanced data from multiple experiments with factorial crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118:741-751.
37. Smitherman R.O. Dressing weight (percentage) of normal channel catfish and stubby, deep-bodied fish from Auburn Fisheries Research Unit populations. Fisheries Research Annual Report 1970, 1:74-76. Auburn University.
38. Sprague G.F., Tatum L.A. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 1942, 34:923-932.
39. Tosh J.J., Garber A.F., Trippel E.A., Robinson J.A.B. Genetic, maternal, and environmental variance components for body weight and length of Atlantic cod at 2 points in life. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:3513-3521.
40. Vandeputte M.K., Quillet E., Chevassus B. Early development and survival in brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.). Indirect effects of selection for growth rate and estimation of genetic parameters. Aquaculture 2002, 204:435-445.
41. Vandeputte M.K., Mauger S., Dupont-Nivet M., De Guerry D., Rodina M., Gela D., Vallod D., Chevassus B., Linhart O. Heritability estimates for growth-related traits using microsatellite parentage assignment in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture 2004, 235:223-236.
42. Volker P.W., Potts B.M., Borrahlho N.M.G. Genetic parameters of intra- and inter-specific hybrids of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens. Tree Genet. Genomics 2008, 4:445-460.
43. Waldbieser G.C., Bosworth B.G. A standardized microsatellite marker panel for parentage and kinship analyses in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Anim. Genet. 2013, 44:476-479.
44. Wang X., Ross K.E., Saillant E., Gatlin D.M., Gold J.R. Quantitative genetics and heritability of growth-related traits in hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops×Morone saxatilis). Aquaculture 2006, 261:535-545.
45. Wei M., van der Werf J.H.J. Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using purebred and crossbred information. Anim. Prod. 1994, 59:401-413.
46. Wei M., van der Werf J.H.J. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73:2220-2226.
47. Wheat J.D., Yu T.J.T., Chou T.C., Kemp K.E., Schallles R.R. Using diallel mating to estimate combining abilities and maternal effects in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1981, 53:629-642.
48. Wilham R.L. Problems in estimating maternal effects. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1980, 7:405-418.
49. Wu H.X., Matheson A.C. General and specific combining ability from partial diallels of radiate pine: implications for utility of SCA in breeding and deployment populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108:1503-1512.