Raising the bar: Maples v. Thomas and the sixth amendment right to counsel

Harvard Law Review

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 468-472

  Steiker, Carol S ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888094576     PISSN: 0017811X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. 132 S. Ct. 912 (2012).
2. quoting Maples v. State, No. CC95-842.60 (Ala. Cir. Ct. Sept. 3, 2003), reprinted in Petition for a Writ of Certiorari app. at 222a, 224a, Maples, 129 S. Ct. 912 (No. 10-63)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
3. 535 U.S. 654 (2002).
4. 545 U.S. 605 (2005).
5. Vermont v. Brillon, 129 S. Ct. 1283, 1292 (2009) (quoting State v. Brillon, 955 A.2d 1108, 1111 (Vt. 2008)).
6. 131 S. Ct. 770, 793 (2011).
7. Rompilla V. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005);
8. Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003);
9. Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000).