Optimising the retrieval of information on adverse drug effects

Health Information and Libraries Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 327-331

  Golder, Su ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EMBASE; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Search strategies; Searching

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DRUG-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS AND ADVERSE REACTIONS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84888072948     PISSN: 14711834     EISSN: 14711842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12045     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Healthcare, 3rd edn. York: University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009.
2. Keech, A. C., Wonders, S. M., Cook, D. I. & Gebski, V. J. Balancing the outcomes: Reporting adverse events. Medical Journal of Australia 2004, 181, 215-218.
3. Loke, Y. K., Price, D. & Herxheimer, A. Chapter 14: Adverse effects. In: Higgins, J. P. T. & Green, S. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (Updated March 2011): The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. [WWW document]. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
4. Dukes, M. N. G. & Aronson, J. K. Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs: An Encyclopedia of Adverse Reactions and Interactions, 15th edn. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006.
5. Derry, S., Loke, Y. K. & Aronson, J. K. Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001, 1, 7.
6. Golder, S., Loke, Y. K. & Bland, M. Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview. PLOS Medicine 2011, 8, e1001026.
7. Golder, S., Loke, Y. K. & Bland, M. Unpublished data can be of value in systematic reviews of adverse effects: methodological overview. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010, 63, 1071-1081.
8. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. Is there evidence for biased reporting of published adverse effects data in pharmaceutical industry-funded studies? British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2008, 66, 767-773.
9. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. The contribution of different information sources for adverse effects data. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2012, 28, 133-137.
10. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2010, 27, 176-190.
11. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2012, 100, 130-134.
12. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. The performance of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2012, 29, 141-151.
13. Golder, S., Loke, Y. K. & Zorzela, L. Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013, 66, 253-260.
14. Chou, R., Aronson, N., Atkins, D., Ismaila, A. S., Santaguida, P., Smith, D. H., Whitlock, E., Wilt, T. J. & Moher, D. AHRQ Series Paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010, 63, 502-512.