Assessment of the image misregistration effects on object-based change detection

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 87, Issue , 2014, Pages 19-27

  Chen, Gang ^a   Zhao, Kaiguang ^b   Powers, Ryan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Change detection; High spatial resolution; Misregistration; Object based; Pixel based

Indexed keywords

IMAGE REGISTRATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; SIGNAL DETECTION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CHANGE DETECTION; HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION; MISREGISTRATION; OBJECT BASED; PIXEL-BASED;

PIXELS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; DETECTION METHOD; ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGERY; PIXEL; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPOT; SUBURBAN AREA; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84888068400     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baltsavias, E., Pateraki, M., Zhang, L., 2001. Radiometric and geometric evaluation of Ikonos GEO images and their use for 3D building modelling. In: Proc. Joint ISPRS Workshop High Resolution Mapping from Space 2001. Hannover, 19-21 September. Institute of Photogrammetry & Geoinformation, University of Hannover, 21 pp. (on CD ROM).
2. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2010, 65(1):2-16.
3. Castilla G., Hay G.J. Image-objects and geo-objects. Object-Based Image Analysis Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-driven Remote Sensing Applications 2008, 91-110. Springer-Verlag, (Chapter 1.5). T. Blaschke, S. Lang, G.J. Hay (Eds.).
4. Chen G., Hay G.J. A support vector regression approach to estimate forest biophysical parameters at the object level using airborne Lidar Transects and QuickBird Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2011, 77(7):733-741.
5. Chen Z., Hutchinson T.C. Urban damage estimation using statistical processing of satellite images. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 2007, 21(3):187-199.
6. Chen G., Hay G.J., Carvalho L.M.T., Wulder M.A. Object-based change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2012, 33(14):37-41.
7. Dai X., Khorram S. The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1998, 36(5):1566-1577.
8. Desclée B., Bogaert P., Defourny P. Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment 2006, 102(1-2):1-11.
9. El Hajj M., Begue A., Lafrance B., Hagolle O., Dedieu G., Rumeau M. Relative radiometric normalization and atmospheric correction of a spot 5 time series. Sensors 2008, 8:2774-2791.
10. Farin D., de With P.H.N. Misregistration errors in change detection algorithms and how to avoid them. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005, 2:438-441.
11. Forman R.T.T., Godron M. Landscape Ecology 1986, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 619 pp.
12. Hall O., Hay G.J. Amultiscale object-specific approach to digital change detection. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2003, 4(4):311-327.
13. Im J., Jensen J.R., Tullis J.A. Object-based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2008, 29(2):399-423.
14. Laben, C.A., Bernard, V., Brower, W., 2000. Process for enhancing the spatial resolution of multispectral imagery using pan-sharpening. US Patent 6.011.875.
15. Li X., Yeh A.G., Qian J., Ai B., Qi Z. A matching algorithm for detecting land use changes using case-based reasoning. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2009, 75(11):1319-1332.
16. Powers R.P., Hay G.J., Chen G. How wetland type and area differ through scale: a GEOBIA case study in Alberta's Boreal Plains. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 117:135-145.
17. Ridd M.K., Liu J.J. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment 1998, 63(2):95-100.
18. Roy D.P. The impact of misregistration upon composited wide field of view satellite data and implications for change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2000, 38(4):2017-2032.
19. Stow D.A. Reducing the effects of misregistration on pixel-level change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1999, 20(12):2477-2483.
20. Townshend J.R.G., Justice C.O., Gurney C., McManus J. The impact of misregistration on change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1992, 30(5):1054-1060.
21. Turner B.L., Lambin E.F., Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:20666-20671.
22. Water W. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 2004, 58(3-4):225-238.