Vulnerability modeling and analysis for critical infrastructure protection applications

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2013, Pages 217-227

  Marrone, Stefano ^a   Nardone, Roberto ^b   Tedesco, Annarita ^b   D'Amore, Pasquale ^b   Vittorini, Valeria ^c   Setola, Roberto ^d   De Cillis, Francesca ^d   Mazzocca, Nicola ^c  

^a SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^b ANSALDO ENERGIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Physical vulnerability assessment; Railway infrastructure; UML profiles

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION; INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION; MODEL TO MODEL TRANSFORMATION; PHYSICAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS; RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE; UML PROFILES; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS;

MODELS; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; SURGE PROTECTION; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 84888064269     PISSN: 18745482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2013.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. E. Bagheri, A. Ghorbani, UML-CI: a reference model for profiling critical infrastructure systems, Inf. Syst. Front. 12 (2) (2010) 115-139.
2. S. Bernardi, J. Merseguer, D. Petriu, A dependability profile within MARTE, Software Syst. Model. 10 (3) (2011) 313-336.
3. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches, IBM Syst. J. 45 (3) (2006) 621-645.
4. F. De Cillis, M. De Maggio, C. Pragliola, R. Setola, Analysis of criminal and terrorist related episodes in railway infrastructure scenarios, J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage. 10 (2) (2013) 1-30.
5. M. Garcia, Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, Massachusetts, 2008.
6. B. Jenkins, B. Butterworth, Explosives and Incendiaries Used in Terrorist Attacks on Public Surface Transportation: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis, MTI Report WP 09-02, Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, California, 2010.
7. J. Jurjens, Secure Systems Development with UML, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
8. I. Kotenko, M. Stepashkin, Attack graph based evaluation of network security, in: Proceedings of the Tenth IFIP TC-6/TC-11 International Conference on Communications and Multimedia Security, 2006, pp. 216-227.
9. F. Lagarde, E. Espinoza, F. Terrier, S. Gerard, Improving UML profile design practices by leveraging conceptual domain models, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2007, pp. 445-448.
10. E. LeMay, M. Ford, K. Keefe, W. Sanders, C. Muehrcke, Model-based security metrics using adversary view security evaluation, in: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, 2011, pp. 191-200.
11. M. Lund, B. Solhaug, K. Stolen, Risk analysis of changing and evolving systems using CORAS, in: A. Aldini, R. Gorrieri (Eds.), Foundations of Security Analysis and Design VI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 231-274.
12. Object Management Group, The UML Profile for MARTE: Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time Embedded Systems, MARTE Version 1.1, Needham, Massachusetts, 2011, URL: 〈〉. http://www.omgmarte.org.
13. Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language: Infrastructure and Superstructure, V2.4.1, Needham, Massachusetts, 2011, URL: 〈〉. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1.
14. B. Selic, A systematic approach to domain-specific language design using UML, in: Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, 2007, pp. 2-9.
15. The METRIP Project, Methodological Tools for Railway Infrastructure Protection, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy, URL: 〈〉. http://metrip.unicampus.it.