Why we need to think about research malpractice in the social sciences: Tony Murphy points to a lack of investigation into academic misconduct and fraud

Criminal Justice Matters

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-27

  Murphy, Tony ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888051577     PISSN: 09627251     EISSN: 19346220     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09627251.2013.865503     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bekkers, R. (2012), 'Risk factors for fraud and academic misconduct in the social sciences', Rene Bekkers, 29 November.
2. Bakker, M. and Wicherts, J. (2011). 'The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals', Behavior Research Methods, 43, pp. 666-678.
3. Fanelli, D. (2010), 'Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data', PLOS ONE5(4).
4. Grove, J. (2012), 'One in eight UK scientists has witnessed research fraud', Times Higher Education, 13 January.
5. Jha, A. (2012), 'False positives: fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research', The Guardian, 13 September.
6. Redford, G. (1952), 'Publish or Else', Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 38(4), pp. 608-618.
7. Van Noorden, R. (2011), 'Science publishing: The trouble with retractions', Nature, 478, pp. 26-28.