Population delimitation across contrasting evolutionary clines in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus)

Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-36

  Yang, D S ^a   Kenagy, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Genealogical discordance; Local adaptation; Peromyscus maniculatus; Population delimitation

Indexed keywords

MUS; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS;

EID: 84888045942     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20457758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Altekar, G., S. Dwarkadas, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and F. Ronquist. 2004. Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 20:407-41
2. Bailey, V. 1936. The mammals and life zones of Oregon. North Am. Fauna 55:1-41
3. Blair, W. F. 1950. Ecological factors in speciation of Peromyscus. Evolution 4:253-27
4. Clark, F. H. 1936. Geotropic behavior on a sloping plane of arboreal and non-arboreal mice of the genus Peromyscus. J. Mammal. 17:44-4
5. Dice L. R. 1940. Ecologic and genetic variability within species of Peromyscus. Am. Nat. 74:212-22
6. Drummond, and A. Rambaut. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7:21
7. Economides, K. D., L. Zeltser, and M. R. Capecchi. 2003. Hoxb13 mutations cause overgrowth of caudal spinal cord and tail vertebrae. Develop. Biol. 256:317-33
8. Frontier, S. 1976. Étude de la decroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyze en composantes principales: comparison avec le mod'ele de baton briśe. J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecol. 25:67-7
9. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-70
10. Hoglund, J. 2009. An evolutionary conservation biology. Pp. 139-190 in Evolutionary conservation genetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
11. Horner, B. 1954. Arboreal adaptations of Peromyscus with special reference to use of the tail. Contrib. Lab. Vertebrate Zool. 61:1-8
12. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-75
13. Kelly, L. P., C. G. Travis, and J. D. Michael. 2002. Cross-species amplification among peromyscines of new microsatellite DNA loci from the oldfield mouse (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:133-13
14. King, J. A. 1968. Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia), 1st edn. The American Society of Mammalogists, StillwaterOK.
15. Kocher, T. D., J. A. Conroy, K. R. McKaye, and J. R. Stauffer. 1993. Similar morphologies of cichlid fish in Lakes Tanganyika and Malawi are due to convergence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:158-16
16. Kuhner, M. K. 2006. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics 22:768-77
17. Lofsvold, D. 1986. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus. I. Tests of the homogeneity of genetic covariance structure among species and subspecies. Evolution 40:559-57
18. Lowe, W. H., and F.W. Allendorf. 2010.What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol. Ecol. 19:3038-305
19. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27, 209-22
20. Moritz, C. 1994. Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:373-37
21. Mullen, L. M., R. J. Hirschmann, K. L. Prince, T. C. Glenn, M. J. Dewey. 2006. Sixty polymorphic microsatellite markers for the oldfield mouse developed in Peromyscus polionotus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6:36-4
22. Nylander, J. A. A., J. C. Wilgenbusch, D. L. Warren, and D. L. Swofford. 2008. AWTY (Are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24:581-58
23. Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, P. Legendreet al. 2008. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1. 15-
24. Paetkau, D., R. Slade, M. Burden, and A. Estoup. 2004. Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol. Ecol. 13:55-5
25. Peakall, R. O. D., and P. E. Smouse. 2006. Genalex6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6:288-29
26. Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1253-125
27. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
28. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-157
29. Ryder, O. 1986. Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1:9-1
30. Storz, J. F., S. J. Sabatino, F. G. Hoffmann, et al. 2007. The molecular basis of high-altitude adaptation in deer mice. PLoS Genet. 3:e4
31. Thompson, D. B. 1990. Different spatial scales of adaptation in the climbing behavior of Peromyscus maniculatus: geographic variation, natural selection, and gene flow. Evolution 44:952-96
32. Verts, B., and L. N. Carraway. 1998. Land mammals of Oregon. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
33. Waples, R. S., and O. Gaggiotti. 2006. INVITED REVIEW:What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 15:1419-143
34. Wilgenbusch, J., D. Warren, and D. Swofford. 2004. AWTY: A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Available at http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty. Accessed 28 February 201
35. Yang, D.-S., and G. J. Kenagy. 2009. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA reveal contrasting evolutionary processes in populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Mol. Ecol. 18:5115-512