Participatory land use modelling, pathways to an integrated approach

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 52, Issue , 2014, Pages 149-165

  Hewitt, Richard ^a,b   van Delden, Hedwig ^c,d   Escobar, Francisco ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b Observatorio para una Cultura del Territorio   (Spain)

^c Research Institute for Knowledge Systems (RIKS)   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e CEPS/INSTEAD   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Calibration; Cellular automata; Integration; Land use modelling; Participation; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY; LAND USE MODELLING; PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PARTICIPATORY METHODS; SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS; STAKEHOLDERS; STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT;

ANALYTICAL MODELS; AUTOMATA THEORY; CALIBRATION; INTEGRATED CONTROL; INTEGRATION;

LAND USE;

CALIBRATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RIVER BASIN; STAKEHOLDER; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANDALUCIA; GUADIAMAR BASIN; SEVILLA; SPAIN;

EID: 84888041865     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Barredo J., Demicheli L., Lavalle C., Kasanko M., McCormick N. Modelling future urban scenarios in developing countries: an application case study in Lagos, Nigeria. Environ. Plann. Plann. Des. 2004, 32:65-84.
2. Barreteau F.O., et al. Our companion modelling approach. J.Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 2003, 6:1. Retrieved from:. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/1.html.
3. Batty M., Xie Y. From cells to cities. Environ. Plann. Plann. Des. 1994, 31-48. 21 Supplement.
4. Bennett N., Croke B., Guariso G., Guillaume J., Hamilton S., Jakeman A., Marsili-Libelli S., Newham L., Norton J., Perrin C., Pierce S., Robson B., Seppelt R., Voinov A., Fath B., Andreassian V. Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 40:1-20.
5. Bousquet F., Trebuil G. Introduction to companion modeling and multi-agent systems for integrated natural resource management in Asia. Companion Modeling and Multi Agent Systems for Integrated Natural Resource Management in Asia 2005, International Rice Research Institute, Manila. F. Bousquet, G. Trebuil, B.Hardy (Eds.).
6. Brown D., Page S., Riolo R., Zellner M., Rand W. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2005, 19(2):153-174.
7. Castellanet C., Jordan C. Participatory Action Research in Natural Resource Management: a Critique of the Method Based on Five Years' Experience in the TransamazÔnica Region of Brazil 2002, Taylor & Francis.
8. Catalá Mateo R., Bosque Sendra J., Plata Rocha W. Análisis de posibles errores en la base de datos Corine Land Cover (1990-2000) en la Comunidad de Madrid. Estud. Geogr. 2008, 69(264):81-104.
9. Chambers R. Rural Development: Putting the Last First 1983, Longmans, London.
10. Chica Ruiz J., Barragán Muñoz J. Estado y tendencia de los servicios de los ecosistemas litorales de Andalucía 2011, (Report), University of Cádiz, Government of Andalusia.
11. Clarke K., Hoppen S., Gaydos L. Aself-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ. Plann. Plann. Des. 1997, 24(2):247-261.
12. De Boer C., Bressers H. Contextual Interaction Theory as a Conceptual Lens on Complex and Dynamic Implementation Processes, Paper for Research Conference COMPACT Work 2011, Challenges of Making Public Administration and Complexity Theory Work, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
13. De Kraker J., van der Wal M. How to make environmental models better in supporting social learning? A critical review of promising tools. Proceedings of the 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Managing Resources of a Limited Planet 2012, Germany, Leipzig. R. Seppelt, A.A. Voinov, S. Lange, D. Bankamp (Eds.).
14. Diaz-Pacheco J., Gutiérrez J. Exploring the limitations of CORINE Land Cover for monitoring urban land-use dynamics in metropolitan areas. J. Land Use Sci. 2013, 1-17. 10.1080/1747423X.2012.761736.
15. Encinas M.A., Hernandez V., Hernández C., Martínez L., Winder N. AConceptual Model of Land Use Change in the Madrid Autonomous Region. TiGrESS Final Report: WP5 EVG1-2002-00081 for the European Commission 2006, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
16. Engelen G., Lavalle C., Barredo J.I., Meulen M., van der, White R. The moland modelling framework for urban and regional land-use dynamics. GeoJournal Library 2007, vol. 90:297-320. Springer, Netherlands, Retrieved from:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5648-2_17, E. Koomen, J. Stillwell, A. Bakema, H.J. Scholten (Eds.).
17. Forrester J.W. Industrial Dynamics 1961, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Pegasus Communications.
18. Hagen-Zanker A. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2003, 17(33):235-249.
19. Hernández E., Carmona J., Schmidt G. Report on the Situation of the Aznalcóllar Mine and the Guadiamar Green Corridor 2004, WWF/Adena Report, (accessed June 2012). http://assets.wwf.es/downloads/report_on_the_aznalcollar_mine_2004_def.pdf.
20. Hernández Jiménez V., Winder N. Running Experiments with the Madrid Simulation Model 2006, Workpackage 5, TiGrESS Project Final Report, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
21. Hewitt R., Hernández-Jiménez V., Encinas M., Escobar F. Land use modelling and the role of stakeholders in natural protected areas: the case of Doñana, Spain. Proceedings of the 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Managing Resources of a Limited Planet 2012, Germany, Leipzig. R. Seppelt, A.A. Voinov, S. Lange, D. Bankamp (Eds.).
22. Jones N.A., Perez P., Measham T.G., Kelly G.J., d'Aquino P., Daniell K.A., Dray A., Ferrand N. Evaluating participatory modeling: developing a framework for cross-case analysis. Environ. Manage. 2009, 44(6):1180-1195.
23. Kok K., Van Delden H. Combining two approaches of integrated scenario development to combat desertification in the Guadalentín watershed, Spain. Environ. Plann. Plann. Des. 2009, 36(1):49-66.
24. Lemon M., Seaton R., Park J. Social enquiry and the measurement of natural phenomena: the degradation of irrigation water in the Argolid Plain, Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 1994, 1:206-220.
25. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., Ene E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Analysis Program for Categorical Maps 2002, Computer Software Program Produced by the Authors at the University of Massachusets, Amherst, Available at:. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
26. Millington J., Demeritt D., Romero-Calcerrada R. Participatory evaluation of agent-based land-use models. J.Land Use Sci. 2011, 6(2-3):195-210. June-September.
27. Montes C. Construir Resiliencia para Doñana en un mundo cambiante. Rev. Sosten. 2007, 35:14-15.
28. Moreira J. 1:25000 Scale Cartographic Series 2007, REDIAM, Junta de Andalucía, Retrieved from:, September 2011. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/rediam.
29. Muñoz-Reinoso J.C. Vegetation changes and groundwater abstraction in SW Doñana, Spain. J.Hydrol. 2001, 242(3):197-209.
30. Oxley T., Jeffrey P., Lemon M. Policy relevant modelling: relationships between water, land use, and farmer decision processes. Integr. Assess. 2002, 3(1):30-49.
31. Oxley T., McIntosh B.S., Winder N., Mulligan M., Engelen G. Integrated model and decision support tools: a Mediterranean example. Environ. Model. Softw. J. 2004, 19(11):999-1010.
32. Palomo I., Martín-López B., López-Santiago C., Montes C. Participatory scenario planning for natural protected areas management under ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system, SW, Spain. Ecol. Soc. 2011, 16:23.
33. Palomo I., Martín-López B., Zorrilla-Miras P., Garcia Del Amo D., Montes C. Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg. Environ. Change 2013, 10.1007/s10113-013-0488-5.
34. Phipps M., Langlois A. Spatial dynamics, cellular automata, and parallel processing computers. Environ. Plann. Plann. Des. 1997, 24(2):193-204.
35. Pontius R., Malanson J. Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2005, 19(2):243-265.
36. Pontius R., Millones M. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32(15):4407-4429.
37. Pontius R., Huffaker D., Denman K. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecol. Model. 2004, 179:445-461.
38. RIKS B.V. Metronamica Documentation 2011, Retrieved from:, March 2012. http://www.riks.nl/resources/documentation/Metronamica%20documentation.pdf.
39. Rykiel E.J. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol. Model. 1996, 90:229-244.
40. Seaton R. Interdisciplinarity, knowledge dynamics, and policy relevant research in environmental communication. Final Report on Contract EV5V-CT97-0684 to Directorate General XII of the Commission of the European Union 2001.
41. Tobler W. Cellular geography. Philosophy in Geography 1979, 379-386. Reidel, Dortrecht. S. Gale, G. Olsson (Eds.).
42. Ulam S.M. Random Processes and Transformations. Proc. International Congress of Mathematicians 1950, vol. 2:264-275.
43. Van Delden H., Hagen-Zanker A. New ways of supporting decision making: linking qualitative storylines with quantitative modelling. Best Practice and New Methods in Planning Support Systems 2009, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. S. Geertman, J.C.H. Stillwell (Eds.).
44. Van Delden H., Hurkens J. AGeneric Integrated Spatial Decision Support System for Urban and Regional Planning. Keynote Presented at MODSIM11 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation 2011, Australia, Perth.
45. Van Delden H., Gutiérrez E.R., van Vliet J., Hurkens J. Xplorah, A multi-scale integrated land use model. Proceedings of IEMS 2008 (iEMSs) at 2008, http://www.iemss.org/iemss2008/index.php?n=Main, M. Sànchez-Marrè, J. Béjar, J. Comas, A. Rizzoli, G. Guariso (Eds.).
46. Van Delden H., Seppelt R., White R., Jakeman A.J. Amethodology for the design and development of integrated models for policy support. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26:266-279. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.021.
47. Van Delden H., Diaz-Pacheco, Shi Y., Van Vliet J. Calibration of cellular automata based land use models: lessons learnt from practical experience. Conference Presentation, International Symposium on Cellular Automata Modeling for Urban and Spatial Systems, Porto, November 2012 2013.
48. Van Vliet J., Bregt A., Hagen-Zanker A. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222(8):1367-1375.
49. Van Vliet J., Naus N., van Lammeren, Bregt A.K., Hurkens J., van Delden H. Measuring the neighbourhood effect to calibrate land use models. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2013, 41:55-64.
50. Van Vliet J., Hagen-Zanker H., Hurkens J., van Delden H. Afuzzy set approach to assess the predictive accuracy of land use simulations. Ecol. Model. 2013, 261-262:32-42.
51. Veldkamp A., Fresco L. CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecol. Model. 1996, 91.
52. Verburg P., Eickhout B., van Meijl H. Amulti-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2008, 42(1):57-77.
53. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25:1268.
54. Volkery A., Ribeiro T., Henrichs T., Hoogeveen Y. Your vision or my model? Lessons from participatory land use scenario development on a European scale. Syst. Action Pract. Res. 2008, 21:459-477.
55. von Neumann John, Birks A.W. On the Theory of Self-reproducing Automata 1966, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana IL.
56. Wagner T.P., Ortolando L. Analysis of new techniques for public involvement in water planning. Water Resour. Bull. 1975, 11(2):329-344.
57. Wagner T.P., Ortolando L. Testing an Iterative, Open Process for Water Resources Planning 1976, U.S. Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Va, 66 pp. (IWR contract report no. 76-2).
58. White R. Pattern based map comparisons. J.Geogr. Syst. 2006, 8:145-164.
59. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ. Plann. 1993, 25(8):1175-1199.
60. White R., Engelen G., Uljee I. Modeling land use change with linked cellular automata and socio-economic models: a tool for exploring the impact of climate change on the island of St. Lucia. Spatial Information for Land Use Management 2000, Gordon and Breach. M. Hill, R. Aspinall (Eds.).
61. Wickramasuriya R.C., Bregt A., Van Delden H., Hagen-Zanker A. The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended constrained cellular automata land use model. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:2302-2309.
62. Winder N. Towards a theory of knowledge systems for integrative socio-natural science. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2004, 11(2):118-132.
63. Zorrilla-Miras P., Palomo I., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Lomas P., Montes C. Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes in southwestern Spain. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2013.