A cost model for forest-based biofuel production and its application to optimal facility size determination

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 38, Issue , 2014, Pages 32-39

  Jenkins, Timothy L ^a   Sutherland, John W ^b  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Economics; Forest biomass; Optimal facility size; Unit cost

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION COSTS; CORN-BASED ETHANOL; FOREST BIOMASS; OPTIMAL FACILITY SIZE; PROCESSING FACILITIES; PRODUCTION FACILITY; TRANSPORTATION COST; UNIT COST;

BIOMASS; COSTS; ECONOMICS; FEEDSTOCKS; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

BIOFUELS;

BIOMASS; COSTS; ECONOMICS; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84888041625     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aden A., Ruth M., Ibsen K., Jechura J., Neeves K., Sheehan J., Wallace B., Montague L., Slayton A., Lukas J. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover 2002, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (NREL/TP-510-32438, June 2002).
2. Alpert S.B. Economy of scale in the metal removal industry. J. Ind. Econ. 1959, 7(3):175-181. (Jul.).
3. Andersson G., Asikainen A., Björheden R., Hall P.W., Hudson J.B., Jirjis R., Mead D.J., Nurmi J., Weetman G.F. Chapter 3: Production of forest energy. Bioenergy From Sustainable Forestry: Guiding Principles and Practice 2002, 49-123. Kluwer Academic Publishers. J. Richardson, R. Björheden, P. Hakkila, A.T. Lowe, C.T. Smith (Eds.).
4. Becker D.R., Skog K., Hellman A., Halvorsen K.E., Mace T. An outlook for sustainable forest bioenergy production in the Lake States. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5687-5693.
5. Bolding C., Lanford B., Kellogg L. Forest fuel reduction: current methods and future possibilities. Proceedings of the 2003 COFE 2003, (7-10 September. Bar Harbor, ME: 5 pp.).
6. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) Pub. L. No. 110-140. 121 Stat 2007, 1492, 1783-84 (Dec. 19, 2007), codified at 42 U.S.C. §17381.
7. Froese R.E., Waterstraut J.R., Johnson D.M., Shonnard D.R., Whitmarsh J.H., Miller C.M. Lignocellulosic ethanol: is it economically and financially viable as a fuel source?. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2008, 18(1):23-45.
8. Gan J., Smith C.T. Optimal plant size and feedstock supply radius: A modeling approach to minimize bioenergy production costs. Biomass and Bioenergy 2011, 35(8):3350-3359.
9. Graham R.L., Liu W., Downing M., Noon C.E., Daly M., Moore A. The effect of location and facility demand on the marginal cost of delivered wood chips from energy crops: a case study of the state of Tennessee. Biomass Bioenergy 1997, 13(3):117-123.
10. Graham R.T., McCaffrey S., Jain T.B. Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-120 2004, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO: U.S., (43 pp.).
11. Greer D. Commercializing cellulosic ethanol. BioCycle 2008, 49(11):47. November, (http://www.jgpress.com/archives/_free/001764.html. Accessed August 10, 2009).
12. Hicks J. Modeling the multi-modal transport of logs and the effects of changing fuel prices 2009, Master thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Houghton, Michigan Technological University.
13. Huang H.-J., Ramaswamy S., Al-Dajani W., Tschirner U., Cairncross R.A. Effect of biomass species and plant size on cellulosic ethanol: a comparative process and economic analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33(2):234-246.
14. Ince P.J., Kramp A., Spelter H., Skog K., Dykstra D. FTM-West: fuel treatment market model for the U.S. West. Draft Manuscript 2006.
15. Jenkins B.M. A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling. Biomass Bioenergy 1997, 13(1/2):1-9.
16. Kocoloski M., Griffin W.M., Matthews H.S. Impacts of facility size and location decisions on ethanol production cost. Energy Policy 2011, 39(1):47-56.
17. Lambert D.K., Middleton J. Logistical design of a regional herbaceous crop residue-based ethanol production complex. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:91-100.
18. Leinonen A. Harvesting technology of forest residues for fuel in the USA and Finland, Espoo 2004. Research Notes 2004, 2229. (132 pp. + app. 10 pp.).
19. Lieberman M.B. Market growth, economies of scale, and plant size in the chemical processing industries. J. Ind. Econ. 1987, 36(2):175-191.
20. Miller C.A., Froese R.E., Leefers L.A. Consequences of corporate timberland ownership change in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. 2007 SAF National Convention, October 23-27 at Portland, OR 2007.
21. National Science Foundation (NSF) Breaking the Chemical and Engineering Barriers to Lignocellulosic Biofuels: Next Generation Hydrocarbon Biorefineries. University of Massachusetts Amherst. National Science Foundation. Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Div 2008, (Washington D.C. 180 pp.). G.W. Huber (Ed.)
22. Nelson, B., 2007. Marvin Nelson Forest Products, Inc. Personal Communications, July 2007.
23. Nelson, B., 2010. Marvin Nelson Forest Products, Inc. Personal Communications, September 2010.
24. Nguyen M.H., Prince R.G.H. A simple rule for bioenergy conversion plant size optimization: bioethanol from sugar cane and sweet sorghum. Biomass Bioenergy 1996, 10:361-365.
25. Noon C.E., Zhan F.B., Graham R.L. GIS-based analysis of marginal price variation with an application in the identification of candidate ethanol conversion plant locations. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2002, 2(1):79-93.
26. Overend R.P. The average haul distance and transportation work factors for biomass delivered to a central plant. Biomass 1982, 2:75-79.
27. Rendleman C.M., Shapouri H. New technologies in ethanol production, AER-842, USDA. Office of Energy Policy and New Uses 2007.
28. Rummer B., Prestemon J., May D., Miles P., Vissage J., McRoberts R., Liknes G., Shepperd W.D., Ferguson D., Elliot W., Miller S., Teutebuch S., Barbour J., Fried J., Stokes B., Bilek E., Skog K. A Strategic Assessment of Forest Biomass and Fuel Reduction Treatments in Western States 2003, USDA Forest Service, (April).
29. Runge C.F., Senauer B. How biofuels could starve the poor. Foreign Aff. 2007, 86:41-54.
30. Searcy E., Flynn P. The impact of biomass availability and processing cost on optimum size and processing technology selection. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008, 154(1-3):92-107. (2009 May).
31. Shapouri H., Gallagher P. USDA's 2002 Ethanol Cost-of-Production Survey. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report Number 841 2005, (July).
32. Starr M.K., Miller D.W. Inventory Control: Theory and Practice 1962, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
33. Stevenson W.J. Production/operations management 1996, Irwin. 5th ed.
34. U.S.Department of Agriculture, U.S.Department of Energy (USDA/DOE) A billion-ton feedstock supply for bioenergy and bioproducts industry: technical feasibility of annually supplying 1billion dry tons of biomass 2005, (DOE/GO-102995-2135; ORNL/TM2005/66).
35. Walsh M. U.S. cellulosic biomass feedstock supplies and distribution. M & E Biomass 2008, (http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7625/2/U.S.%20Biomass%20Supplies. Pdf, accessed February 16, 2009).
36. Wooley R., Ruth M., Sheehan J., Ibsen K. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios NREL report TP-580-26157, July. http://www.ott.doe.gov/biofuels/process_engineering.html.
37. Wright M., Brown R.C. Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2007, 1(3):191-2000.
38. Wyman C.E. Potential synergies and challenges in refining cellulosic biomass to fuels chemicals, and power. Biotechnol. Program 2003, 254-262.