Complex baseflow in urban streams: An example from central Ohio, USA

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 3005-3014

  Liu, G ^a   Schwartz, F W ^a   Kim, Y ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Korea Institute of Geosceince and Mineral Resources   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Baseflow; Groundwater; SC Q hysteresis; SWMM; Urban streams

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC ACTIVITY; BASEFLOWS; GEOCHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE; STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENTS; SWMM; URBAN STREAM;

GROUNDWATER; HYSTERESIS; STREAM FLOW;

RIVERS;

BASEFLOW; COMPLEXITY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HYSTERESIS; INFLOW; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RIVER DISCHARGE; STREAMFLOW; STREAMWATER; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

COLUMBUS [OHIO]; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84888036892     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2358-3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen GR, Liu G (2011) IHACRES classic: software for the identification of unit hydrographs and component flows. Ground Water 49: 305-308. doi: 10. 1111/j. 17456584. 2011. 00814. x.
2. Brabec E, Schulte S, Richards PL (2002) Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. J Plann Lit 16: 499-514.
3. Brun SE, Band LE (2000) Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24: 5-22.
4. Brunke M, Gonser T (1997) The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biol 37: 1-33.
5. Caissie D, Pollock TL, Cunjak RA (1996) Variation in stream water chemistry and hydrograph separation in a small drainage basin. J Hydrol 178: 137-157.
6. Chapman TG (1991) Comment on Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses by Nathan RJ, McMahon TA. Water Resour Res 27(7): 1783-1784.
7. Chin A (2006) Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79: 460-487.
8. Croke BF, Andrews WF, Jakeman AJ, Cuddy S, Luddy A (2005) Redesign of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. 29th hydrology and water resources symposium, water capital, engineers Australia. ISBN 085 825 8439.
9. Garcia-Fresca B (2007) Urban-enhanced groundwater recharge: review and case study of Austin, Texas, USA. In: Howard K (ed) Urban groundwater-meeting the challenge: selected papers from the 32nd international geological congress (IGC), Florence, Italy. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 3-18.
10. Gustard A, Roald L, Demuth S, Lumadjeng H, Gross R (1989) Flow regimes from experimental and network data (FREND), vol 2. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
11. Hall AJ (1971) Baseflow recessions and baseflow hydrograph separation problem. In: Proceedings of the hydrology symposium, Institution of Engineers, Canberra, Australia, pp 159-170.
12. Harstine LJ (1991) Hydrologic atlas for Ohio. Division of Water, Ohio Department of Natural Resources web. http://www. ohiodnr. com/water/pubs/hydatlas/tabid/4187/Default. aspx.
13. He M, Hogue T (2011) Integrating hydrologic modeling and land use projections for evaluation of hydrologic response and regional water supply impacts in semi-arid environments. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-011-1144-3.
14. Heppell CM, Chapman AS (2005) Analysis of a two-component hydrograph separation model to predict herbicide runoff in drained soils. Agric Water Manage. doi: 10. 1016/j. agwat. 2005. 02. 008.
15. Jakeman AJ, Littlewoodand IG, Whitehead PG (1990) Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. J Hydrol 117: 275-300.
16. Johns DA, Pope SR (1998) Urban impacts on the chemistry of shallow groundwater: Barton Creek watershed, Austin, Texas. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 48: 129-138.
17. Leopold LB (1968) Hydrology for urban land planning-A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. Geological Survey Circular 554; U. S. Geological Survey: Washington, DC, USA.
18. Lerner DN (2002) Identifying and quantifying urban recharge: a review. Hydrogeol J 10: 143-152.
19. Littlewood IG, Jakeman AJ (1994) A new method of rainfall-runoff modelling and its applications in catchment hydrology In: Zannetti P (eds) Environmental modelling, vol II. Wallingford, OX, pp 143-171.
20. Meyer SC (2005) Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA. Hydrogeol J 13(5-6): 871-885.
21. O'Driscoll M, Clinton S, Jefferson A, Manda A, McMillan S (2010) Urbanization effects on watershed hydrology and in-stream processes in the southern United States. Water 2(3): 605-648. doi: 10. 3390/w2030605.
22. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (2001) Biological and water study of the Olentangy River and selected tributaries 1999. Division of surface water. Ecol Assess Sect, Columbus, OH.
23. Paul M, Meyer J (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 333-365.
24. Pellerin BA, Wollheim WM, Feng X, Vorosmarty CJ (2008) The application of electrical conductivity as a tracer for hydrograph separation in urban catchment. Hydrol Process 22: 1810-1818.
25. Rose S (2007) The effects of urbanization on the hydrochemistry of baseflow within the Chatahoochee River Basin (Georgia, USA). J Hydrol 341: 42-54.
26. Rose S, Peters NE (2001) Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta area (Georgia, USA): a comparative hydrological approach. Hydrol Process 15: 1441-1457.
27. Rossman LA (2009) Storm water management model user's manual, version 5. 0. U. S. Environmental Research Agency. EPA/600/R-05/040. Revised July 2009.
28. Rushton KR, Kawecki MW, Brassington FC (1988) Groundwater model of conditions in Liverpool sandstone aquifer. J Inst Water Environ Manage 2(1): 67-84.
29. Rutledge AT (1998) Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from streamflow U. S. Geological Survey Water-Resources records-update: investigations report 98-4148, 43 p.
30. Sloto RA, Crouse MY (1996) HYSEP: a computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis: U. S. geological survey water-resources investigations report 96-4040, 46 p.
31. Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240: 147-186.
32. Sophocleus M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10: 52-67.
33. Walsh C, Roy A, Feminella J, Cottingham P, Groffman P, Morgan R (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24: 706-772.