Motility analysis of bacteria-based microrobot (bacteriobot) using chemical gradient microchamber

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 134-143

  Park, Daechul ^a   Park, Sung Jun ^a   Cho, Sunghoon ^a   Lee, Yeonkyung ^a   Lee, Yu Kyung ^a   Min, Jung Joon ^b   Park, Bang Ju ^c   Ko, Seong Young ^a   Park, Jong Oh ^a   Park, Sukho ^a  

^a Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

^b Chonnam National University Medical School   (South Korea)

^c Gachon University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bacteriobot; Chemotaxis; Microchamber; Microrobot; Salmonella typhimurium

Indexed keywords

BACTERIOBOT; CHEMOTAXIS; MICRO ROBOTS; MICRO-CHAMBERS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

AMINO ACIDS; BIOCHEMISTRY; DATA COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSIS; DRUG DELIVERY; FLOW MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MICROCHANNELS; SALMONELLA; TUMORS;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

AGAROSE; ASPARTIC ACID; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; NICKEL SULFATE; POLYSTYRENE; CHEMOTACTIC FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BACTERIOBOT; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMOTAXIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; MOTION; NONHUMAN; ROBOTICS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DEVICES; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECTS; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOVINAE; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS; CHEMOTAXIS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; ROBOTICS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

EID: 84888035739     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25007     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahmed T, Stocher R. 2008. Experimental verification of the behavioral foundation of bacterial transport parameters using microfluidics. Biophys J 95:4481-4493.
2. Ahmed T, Shimizu TS, Stocker R. 2010. Bacterial chemotaxis in linear and nonlinear steady microfluidic gradients. Nano Lett 10:3379-3385.
3. Bainer R, Park H, Cluzel P. 2003. A high-throughput capillary assay for bacterial chemotaxis. J Microbiol Meth 55:315-319.
4. Barak RB, Eisenbach M. 1999. Chemotactic-like response of Escherichia coli cell slacking the known chemotaxis machinery but containing overexpressed CheY. Mol Microbiol 31:1125-1137.
5. Behkam B, Sitti M. 2008. Effect of quantity and configuration of attached bacteria on bacterial propulsion of microbeads. Appl Phys Lett 93:223901-223903.
6. Berg HC. 2003. The Rotary motor of bacterial flagella. Annu Rev Biochem 72:19-54.
7. Braatsch S, Klug S. 2004. Blue light perception in bacteria. Photosynth Res 79:45-57.
8. Bren A, Eisenbach M. 2000. How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: Protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation. J Bacteriol 182:6865-6873.
9. Cheng SY, Heilman S, Wasserman M, Archer S, Shuler ML, Wu MM. 2007. A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration. Lab Chip 7:763-769.
10. Cho SH, Park SJ, Ko SY, Park JO, Park SH. 2012. Development of bacteria-based microrobot using biocompatible poly(ethylene glycol). Biomed Microdevices 14:1019-1025.
11. Darnton N, Turner L, Breuer K, Berg HC. 2004. Moving fluid with bacterial carpets. Biophys J 86:1863-1870.
12. Diao JP, Young L, Kim S, Fogarty EA, Heilman SM, Zhou P, Shuler ML, Wu MM, DeLisa MP. 2006. A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. Lab Chip 6:381-388.
13. Eisenbach M. 1996. Microreview control of bacterial chemotaxis. Mol Microbiol 20:903-910.
14. McEldowney S, Fletcher M. 1986. Variability of the influence of physicochemical factors affecting bacterial adhesion to polystyrene substrata. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:460-465.
15. Englert DL, Manson MD, Jayaraman A. 2009. Flow-based microfluidic device for quantifying bacterial chemotaxis in stable, competing gradients. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4557-4564.
16. Jeon H, Lee Y, Jin S, Koo S, Lee CS, Yoo JY. 2009. Quantitative analysis of single bacterial chemotaxis using a linear concentration gradient microchannel. Biomed Microdevices 11:1135-1143.
17. Kasinskas RW, Forbes NS. 2006. Salmonella typhimurium specifically chemotaxis and proliferate in heterogeneous tumor tissue in vitro. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:710-721.
18. Kim MJ, Breuer KS. 2007. Controlled mixing in microfluidic systems using bacterial chemotaxis. Anal Chem 79:955-959.
19. Kim D, Liu A, Diller E, Sitti M. 2012. Chemotactic steering of bacteria propelled microbeads. Biomed Microdevices 14:1009-1017.
20. Lanning LM, Ford RM, Long T. 2008. Bacterial chemotaxis transverse to axial flow in a microfluidic channel. Biotechnol Bioeng 100:653-663.
21. Leschner S, Westphal K, Dietrich N, Viegas N, Jablonska J, Lyszkiewicz M, Lienenklaus S, Falk W, Gekara N, Loessner H, Weiss S. 2009. Tumor invasion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is accompanied by strong hemorrhage promoted by TNF-alpha. PLoS ONE 4:e6692.
22. Mao H, Cremer PS, Manson MD. 2003. A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5449-5454.
23. Min JJ, Nguyen VH, Kim HJ, Hong T, Choy HE. 2008. Quantitative bioluminescence imaging of tumor-targeting bacteria in living animals. Nat Protoc 3:1-8.
24. Mokrani N, Felfoul O, Zarreh FA, Mohammadi M, Aloyz R, Batist G, Martel S. 2010. Magnetotactic bacteria penetration into multicellular tumor spheroids for targeted therapy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC) 2010:4371-4374.
25. Park SJ, Bae HI, Kim JH, Lim BJ, Park JO, Park SH. 2010. Motility enhancement of bacteria actuated microstructures using selective bacteria adhesion. Lab Chip 10:1706-1711.
26. Requicha AAG. 2003. Nanorobots, NEMS, and nanoassembly. IEEE Nanoelecton Nanoprocess 91:1922-1933.
27. Seymour JR, Ahmed T, Durham WM, Stocker R. 2009. Resource patch formation and exploitation throughout the marine microbial food web. Am Nat 173:E15-E29.
28. Sharma NN, Mittal RK. 2008. Nanorobot movement: Challenges and biologically inspired solutions. Int J Smart Sens Intell Syst 1:87-108.
29. Sitti M. 2009. Miniature devices: Voyage of the microrobots. Nature 458:1121-1122.
30. Sowa Y, Berry RM. 2008. Bacterial flagellar motor Q Rev Biophys 41:103-132.
31. Stocker R, Seymour JR, Samadani A, Hunt DE, Polz MF. 2008. Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4209-4214.
32. Traor'e MA, Sahari A, Behkam B. 2011. Computational and experimental study of chemotaxis of an ensemble of bacteria attached to a microbead. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 84:061908-1-061908-6.
33. Wadhams CH, Armitage JP. 2004. Making sense of it all: Bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 5:1024-1037.
34. Wolf AJ, Berg HC. 1989. Migration of bacteria in semisolid agar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6973-6977.
35. Wu HK, Huang B, Zare RN. 2006. Generation of complex, static solution gradients in microfluidic channels. J Am Chem Soc 128:4194-4195.
36. Yoo JW, Irvine DJ, Discher DE, Mitragotri S. 2011. Bio-inspired, bioengineered and biomimetic drug delivery carriers. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:521-535.
37. Zhao M, Yang M, Li XM, Jiang P, Baranov E, Li S, Xu M, Penman S, Hoffman RM. 2005. Tumor-targeting bacterial therapy with amino acid auxotrophs of GFP-expressing Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 3:755-760.
38. Zhulin IB, Rowsell EH, Johnson MS, Taylor BL. 1997. Glycerol elicits energy taxis of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 179:3196-3201.