Assessing the economic feasibility of short rotation loblolly biomass plantations

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 38, Issue , 2014, Pages 126-131

  Kantavichai, Rapeepan ^a   Gallagher, Tom V ^a   Teeter, Larry D ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Biomass; Cellulosic biofuel; Forest management; Loblolly; Short rotation

Indexed keywords

BIO-ENERGY; BREAK-EVEN PRICES; CELLULOSIC BIOFUELS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES; LOBLOLLY; SHORT ROTATION; TIMBER MANAGEMENT;

BIOFUELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; FORESTRY; LANDFORMS; ROTATION;

BIOMASS;

EID: 84888027438     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen H.L., Dougherty P.M., Campbell R.G. Manipulation of water and nutrients-practice and opportunity in Southern United States pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management 1990, 30:437-453.
2. Barlow R.J., Dubois M.R. Cost and cost trends for forestry practice in the south. Forest Landowners 2011, 70:14-24.
3. Bullock B.P., Burkhart H.E. Equations for predicting green weight of loblolly pine trees in the south. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 2003, 27:153-159.
4. Burkhart H.E., Strub M.R. A model for simulation of planted loblolly pine stands. Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation 1974, 128-135. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden. J. Fries (Ed.).
5. Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L., Westfall J.A., Daniels R.F. PTAEDA3.1: Simulation of Individual Tree Growth, Stand Development and Economic Evaluation in Loblolly Pine Plantations 2003, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, [computer program].
6. Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L., Westfall J.A., Daniels R.F. PTAEDA4.0: Simulation of Individual Tree Growth, Stand Development and Economic Evaluation in Loblolly Pine Plantations 2008, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, [computer program].
7. Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L., Westfall J.A., Daniels R.F. PTAEDA4.0: Simulation of Individual Tree Growth, Stand Development and Economic Evaluation in Loblolly Pine Plantations 2008, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, (User's guide. 27 pp.).
8. 2 efflux 10years after harvest. Forest Ecology and Management 2006, 227:89-95.
9. Carter M.C., Dean T.J., Wang Z.Y., Newbold R.A. Impacts of harvesting and postharvest treatments on soil bulk density, soil strength, and early growth of Pinus taeda in the Gulf Coastal Plain: a long-term soil productivity affiliated study. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2006, 36:601-614.
10. Dickens E.D., McElvany B.C., Irwin K.M., Wynne T.L. Fertilization of unthinned loblolly pine on an intensively prepared cut-over site in Twiggs County, Georgia - four year results. Georgia Forest Productivity 2005, (Pub #001R-05. 7 pp.).
11. Dickmann D.I. Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: then and now. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006, 30:696-705.
12. Fox T.R., Jokela E.J., Allen H.L. The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. Journal of Forestry 2007, 105:337-347.
13. Gorman J. Institutional Timberland Investments: Asset Pricing and the Discount Rate 2012, Auburn University, Ph.D. Dissertation, (87 pp.).
14. Guo Z., Grebner D.L., Sun C., Grado S.C. Evaluation of loblolly pine management regimes in Mississippi for biomass supplies: a simulation approach. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 2010, 34:65-71.
15. Johnson D.W., Knoepp J.D., Swank W.T., Shan J., Morris L.A., Van Lear D.H., Kapeluck P.R. Effects of forest management on soil carbon: results of some long-term resampling studies. Environmental Pollution 2002, 116:201-208.
16. Johnson J.M.F., Coleman M.D., Gesch R., Jaradat A., Mitchell R.B., Reicosky D., Wilhelm W.W. Biomass-bioenergy crops in the United States: a changing paradigm. The Americas Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 2007, 1:1-28.
17. Kaya Z., Sewell M.M., Neale D.B. Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing annual height- and diameter-increment growth in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1999, 98:586-592.
18. Kimmins J.P. Evaluation of the consequences for future tree productivity of the loss of nutrients in whole-tree harvesting. Forest Ecology and Management 1977, 1:169-183.
19. Lockaby B.G., Vidrine C.G. Effect of logging equipment traffic on soil density and growth and survival of young loblolly pine. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1984, 8:109-112.
20. Martin S.W., Shiver B.D. Impacts of vegetation control, genetic improvement and their interaction on loblolly pine growth in the southern United States - age 12 results. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 2002, 26:37-42.
21. McKee W.H. A loblolly pine management guide - preparing Atlantic coastal plain sites for loblolly pine plantations. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-57 1989.
22. Munsell J.F., Fox T.R. An analysis of the feasibility of increasing woody biomass production from pine plantations in the southern United States. Biomass and Bioenergy 2010, 34:1631-1642.
23. Perlack R., Wright L.L., Turhollow A.F., Graham R.L., Stokes B.J., Erbach D.C. Biomass as feedstock for bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Report ORNL/TM-2005/66, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, April 2005 2005.
24. Piatek K.B., Allen H.L. Site preparation effects on foliar N and P use, retranslocation, and transfer to litter in 15-years old Pinus taeda. Forest Ecology and Management 2000, 129:143-152.
25. Plum Creek Inc. Advanced-generation loblolly pine seedlings Available online at, (last accessed July 20, 2012). http://www.plumcreektrees.com/c-12-advanced-generation-loblolly-pine-seedlings.aspx.
26. SAS Institute Inc. Version 9.1 [Computer Program] 2003, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
27. Scott D.A., Dean T.J. Energy trade-offs between intensive biomass utilization, site productivity loss, and ameliorative treatments in loblolly pine plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006, 30:1001-1010.
28. Scott D.A., Tiarks A.E., Sanchez F.G., Elliott-Smith M., Stagg R. Forest soil productivity on the southern long-term soil productivity sites at age 5. General Technical Report SRS-71 2004, 372-377. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC. K.F. Connor (Ed.).
29. Sharma M., Amateis R.L., Burkhart H.E. Top height definition and its effect on site index determination in thinned and unthinned loblolly pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 2002, 168:163-175.
30. South D.B., Johnson R., Hainds M., VanderSchaaf C.L. Realized gains from planting Pinus taeda in 6.1meter rows in Alabama. The Open Forest Science Journal 2011, 4:71-77.
31. Stanturf J.A., Kellison R.C., Broerman F.S., Jones S.B. Productivity of southern pine plantations - where are we and how did we get here?. Journal of Forestry 2003, 101:26-31.
32. Subedi S., Kane M., Zhao D., Borders B., Greene D. Cultural intensity and planting density effects on aboveground biomass of 12-year-old loblolly pine trees in the Upper Coastal Plain and Piedmont of the southeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 2012, 267:157-162.
33. Swank W.T., DeBano L.F., Nelson D. Effects of timber management practices on soil and water. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO 1989, 55:79-106. For.Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Washington, D.C. R.L. Burns (Ed.).
34. Talbert J.T., Weir R.J., Arnold R.D. Costs and benefits of a mature first-generation loblolly pine tree improvement program. Journal of Forestry 1985, 83:162-165.
35. Tiarks A.E., Haywood J.D. Pinus taeda L. response to fertilization, herbaceous plant control, and woody plant control. Forest Ecology and Management 1986, 14:103-112.
36. Timber Mart-South Annual Report 2011, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
37. Toms M.W., Lewis D.K. Whole-tree chips: an additional energy source for Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 1987, 67:89-95.
38. VanderSchaaf C.L., South D.B. Early growth response of slash pine to double-bedding on a flatwoods site in Georgia. USDA For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-71 2004, 363-367. K.F. Connor (Ed.).
39. Westfall J.A., Burkhart H.E., Allen H.L. Young stand growth modeling for intensively-managed loblolly pine plantations in Southeastern U.S. Forest Science 2004, 50:823-835.
40. Zhao D., Kane M., Borders B., Subedi S., Akers M. Effects of cultural intensity and planting density on stand-level aboveground biomass production and allocation for 12-year-old loblolly pine plantations in the Upper Coastal Plain and Piedmont of the southeastern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2012, 42:111-122.