Publicly funded research: A participative experience from the chilean native forest research fund

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 37, Issue , 2013, Pages 37-43

  Real, Alejandra ^a   Hickey, Gordon M ^b  

^a Gerencia de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas   (Chile)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Case study; Democratic science; Participation; Public research; South America

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATIVE ACTIONS; DEMOCRATIC SCIENCE; PARTICIPATION; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; PUBLIC RESEARCH; RESEARCH PRIORITIES; SOUTH AMERICA; STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR;

FORESTRY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

RESEARCH;

FORESTRY; LEGISLATION; RESEARCH;

SCAEVIUS MILII;

EID: 84888022920     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abelson J., Forest P.-G., Eyles J., Smith P., Martin E., Gauvin F.-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 2003, (2):239-251.
2. Appelstrand M. Participation and societal values: the challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. For. Pol. Econ. 2002, 4(4):281-290.
3. Backstrand K. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Polit. 2003, 3:24-41.
4. Bogner A. The paradox of participation experiments. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2012, 37(5):506-527.
5. CCBN Acta 3ra Sesión Ordinaria del Consejo Consultivo del Bosque Nativo, 02 de junio de 2009 Available from, (Accessed 29 October 2010). http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/actas-ccLBN/Acta_3a_Sesion-2009.pdf.
6. CCBN Acta 1ra Sesión Ordinaria del Consejo Consultivo del Bosque Nativo, 29 de enero de 2010 Available from:, (Accessed 29 October 2010). http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/actas-ccLBN/Acta_1a_Sesion-2010.pdf.
7. CCBN Acta 2da Sesión Ordinaria del Consejo Consultivo del Bosque Nativo, 12 de mayo de 2010 Available from:, (Accessed 29 October 2010). http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/actas-ccLBN/Acta_2a_Sesion-2010.pdf.
8. Chambers S. Deliberative democratic theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2003, 6:307-326.
9. Chilvers J. Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2008, 33:155-185.
10. Consejo Consultivo del Bosque Nativo (CCBN) Acta 2da Sesión Ordinaria del Consejo Consultivo del Bosque Nativo, 27 de abril de 2009 Available from:, (Accessed 29 October 2010). http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/actas-ccLBN/Acta_2a_Sesion-2009.pdf.
11. Echeverría C., Coomes D., Salas J., Rey-Benayas J.M., Lara A., Newton A. Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean temperate forests. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130(4):481-494.
12. Edgar A. Habermas: The Key Concepts 2006, Routledge, Abingdon.
13. Fischer F. Technological deliberation in a democratic society: the case for participatory inquiry. Sci. Pub. Pol. 1999, 26:294-302.
14. Habermas J. A reply to my critics. Habermas: Critical Debates 1982, 219-283. Macmillan, Basingstoke. J. Thompson, D. Held (Eds.).
15. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms 1996, Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.
16. Habermas J. On the Pragmatics of Communication, Polity Press 1998, Polity Press, Cambridge U.K.
17. Hall A., Sulaiman V.R., Clark N., Yoganand B. From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agric. Syst. 2003, 78:213-241.
18. Hendriks C.M., Grin J. Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2007, 9(3-4):333-350.
19. Kleinman D.L. Beyond the science wars: contemplating the democratization of science. Polit. Life Sci. 1998, 16:133-145.
20. Kleinschmit D. Confronting the demands of a deliberative public sphere with media constraints. For. Pol. Econ. 2012, 16:71-80.
21. Klenk N.L., Hickey G.M. Government science in forestry: characteristics and policy utilization. For. Pol. Econ. 2011, 13:37-45.
22. Klenk N.L., Hickey G.M. How can formal research networks produce more socially robust forest science?. For. Pol. Econ. 2013, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.05.006.
23. Krott M., Bader A., Schusser C., Devkota R., Maryudi A., Giessen L., Aurenhammer H. Actor-centred power: the driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. For. Pol. Econ. 2013, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012.
24. Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile Ley sobre recuperación del bosque nativo y fomento forestal, Ley 20283 Available from:, (Accessed 29 June 2013). http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/normativa/Ley-bosque-nativo.pdf.
25. Neira E., Verscheure H., Revenga C. Chile's Frontier Forests: Conserving a Global Treasure 2002, Global Forest Watch, World Resources Institute, Washington DC.
26. Parkins J.R., Davidson D.J. Constructing the public sphere in compromised settings: environmental governance in the Alberta forest sector. Can. Rev. Sociol. 2008, 45:177-196.
27. Parkins J.R., Mitchell R.E. Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2007, 18(6):529-540.
28. Real A. Discourses and Distortions: Dimensions of Global and National Forest Science Communication 2008, Göttingen, Univ., Diss., (Available from: http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl/?webdoc-2335 [Accessed 9 September 2010]).
29. Spilsbury M.J., Nasi R. The interface of policy research and the policy development process: challenges posed to the forestry community. For. Pol. Econ. 2006, 8:193-205.
30. Stevanov M., Böcher M., Krott M., Krajter S., Vuletic D., Orlovic S. The Research, Integration and Utilization (RIU) model as an analytical framework for the professionalization of departmental research organizations: case studies of publicly funded forest research institutes in Serbia and Croatia. For. Pol. Econ. 2013, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.03.006.
31. Wehling P. From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development. Poiesis Prax. 2012, 9(1-2):43-60.
32. Wilson K.A., Newton A.C., Echeverria C., Weston C.J., Burgman M.A. A vulnerability analysis of the temperate forests of south central Chile. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 122:9-21.
33. Wynne B. Public participation in science and technology: performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Sci. Technol. Soc. 2007, 1:99-110.
34. Young I.M. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Polit. Theory 2001, 29:670-690.