Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980-2010

Scientometrics

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 491-517

  Kumar, Sameer ^a   Jan, Jariah Mohd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Business; Co authorship networks; Co authorship strategy; Malaysia; Management; Research collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888008803     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-0994-8     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011a). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 594-607.
2. Abbasi, A., Chung, K. S. K., & Hossain, L. (2011b). Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance. Information Processing & Management, 48(4), 671-679.
3. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? Scientometrics, 88(3), 915-928. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0426-6.
4. Abrizah, A., & Wee, M. C. (2011). Malaysia's computer science research productivity based on publications in the Web of Science, 2000-2010. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 109-124.
5. Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
6. Barabasi, A. L., & Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-free networks. Scientific American, 288(5), 60-69.
7. Barabasi, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311(3-4), 590-614.
8. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
9. Bhandari, M., Einhorn, T. A., Swiontkowski, M. F., & Heckman, J. D. (2003). Who did what?: (Mis) perceptions about authors' contributions to scientific articles based on order of authorship. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85(8), 1605.
10. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
11. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1165821.
12. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2005). Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3), 391-392.
13. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385.
14. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. [Proceedings Paper]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339-365.
15. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
16. de Solla Price, D. J., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011.
17. Di Caro, L., Cataldi, M., & Schifanella, C. (2012). The d-index: Discovering dependences among scientific collaborators from their bibliographic data records. Scientometrics, 93(3), 583-607. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-012-0762-1.
18. Fatt, C. K., Abu Ujum, E., & Ratnavelu, K. (2010). The structure of collaboration in the Journal of Finance. Scientometrics, 85(3), 849-860. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0254-0.
19. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
20. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185-202.
22. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
23. Harirchi, G., Melin, G., & Etemad, S. (2007). An exploratory study of the feature of Iranian co-authorships in biology, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics, 72(1), 11-24. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-007-1693-0.
24. Hart, R. L. (2000). Co-authorship in the academic library literature: A survey of attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(5), 339-345. doi: 10. 1016/s0099-1333(00)00140-3.
25. Havemann, F., Heinz, M., & Kretschmer, H. (2006). Collaboration and distances between German immunological institutes-a trend analysis. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 1(1), 6.
26. Heinze, T., & Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Across institutional boundaries? Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience. Research Policy, 37(5), 888-899. doi: 10. 1016/j. respol. 2008. 01. 009.
27. Hu, C., & Racherla, P. (2008). Visual representation of knowledge networks: A social network analysis of hospitality research domain. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 302-312. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijhm. 2007. 01. 002.
28. Kadushin, C. (2011). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Kang, I. S., Na, S. H., Lee, S., Jung, H., Kim, P., Sung, W. K., et al. (2009). On co-authorship for author disambiguation. Information Processing and Management, 45(1), 84-97. doi: 10. 1016/j. ipm. 2008. 06. 006.
30. Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Natarajan, M., & Babu, B. R. (2011). Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: A scientometric analysis, 1990-2009. Scientometrics, 89(2), 501-522. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0477-8.
31. Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31-43.
32. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
33. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34. Kuzhabekova, A. (2011). Impact of co-authorship strategies on research productivity: A social-network analysis of publications in Russian cardiology. University of Minnesota.
35. Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 510-513.
36. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Sciences, 16, 317-324.
37. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
38. Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213-238.
39. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313-323.
40. Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 64. 016131.
41. Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 64. 016132.
42. Newman, M. E. J. (2001c). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2), 404-409.
43. Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20), 208701. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevLett. 89. 208701.
44. Newman, M. E. J. (2004a). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In E. Ben-Naim, H. Frauenfelder, & Z. Toroczkai (Eds.), Complex networks (pp. 337-370). Berlin: Springer.
45. Newman, M. E. J. (2004b). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5200-5205. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0307545100.
46. Newman, M. E. J. (2007). The mathematics of networks. In The new palgrave encyclopedia of economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453.
48. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1999). The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report.
49. Pepe, A., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2010). Collaboration in sensor network research: An in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns. Scientometrics, 84(3), 687-701. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-009-0147-2.
50. Persson, O., Melin, G., Danell, R., & Kaloudis, A. (1997). Research collaboration at Nordic universities. Scientometrics, 39(2), 209-223.
51. Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration*. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423-443.
52. Price, D. S. (1963). Big science, little science. New York: Columbia University.
53. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
54. Quatman, C., & Chelladurai, P. (2008). The Social construction of knowledge in the field of sport management: A social network perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 22(6), 651-676.
55. Rousseau, B., & Rousseau, R. (2000). LOTKA: A program to fit a power law distribution to observed frequency data. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics (4), 4.
56. Serenko, A., Bontis, N., & Grant, J. (2009). A scientometric analysis of the proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996-2008 period. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 8-21.
57. Shrum, W., Genuth, J., & Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. Cambridge: MIT Press.
58. Smith, M. A., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Barash, V., Dunne, C., et al. (2009). Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL (pp. 255-264). In Proceedingsof the 4th international conference on communities and technologies, ACM.
59. Tang, L., & Walsh, J. P. (2010). Bibliometric fingerprints: name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps. Scientometrics, 84(3), 763-784. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0196-6.
60. Torrisi, B. (2013). Academic productivity correlated with well-being at work. Scientometrics, 1-15.
61. Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A., & Rasmussen, K. (2012). Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics, 90(2), 687-699. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0511-x.
62. Vinluan, L. R. (2012). Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 91(1), 277-294. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0496-5.
63. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis, methods and applications (1st ed., Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.
65. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Structural analysis in the social sciences 2: Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Yan, E. J., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107-2118. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 21128.
67. Yan, E. J., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. H. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115-131. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-009-0027-9.
68. Yin, L. C., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R. A., & Liu, Z. Y. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1599-1613. doi: 10. 1016/j. ipm. 2006. 03. 021.