A criticism of the value of midparent in polyploidization

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 64, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 4119-4129

  Gianinetti, A ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Genetic additivity; Heterosis; Homeostasis; Mid parent value; Neo polyploids; Polyploidization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; EPISTASIS; GENETIC ADDITIVITY; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; HOMEOSTASIS; MID-PARENT VALUE; NEO-POLYPLOIDS; PHENOTYPE; POLYPLOIDIZATION.; POLYPLOIDY; REVIEW;

GENETIC ADDITIVITY; HETEROSIS; HOMEOSTASIS; MID-PARENT VALUE; NEO-POLYPLOIDS; POLYPLOIDIZATION.;

CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYPLOIDY;

EID: 84887965505     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert263     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Albertin W, Balliau T, Brabant P., Chevre AM, Eber F, Malosse C, Thiellement H. 2006. Numerous and rapid nonstochastic modifications of gene products in newly synthesized Brassica napus allotetraploids. Genetics 173, 1101-1113.
2. Albertin W, Marullo P. 2012. Polyploidy in fungi: evolution after whole-genome duplication. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 279, 2497-2509.
3. Allard RW. 1999. Principles of plant breeding, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Álvarez-Castro JM. 2012. Current applications of models of genetic effects with interactions across the genome. Current Genomics 13, 163-175.
5. Balao F, Herrera J, Talavera S. 2011. Phenotypic consequences of polyploidy and genome size at the microevolutionary scale: a multivariate morphological approach. The New Phytologist 192, 256-265.
6. Bansal P, Banga S, Banga SS 2012. Heterosis as investigated in terms of polyploidy and genetic diversity using designed Brassica juncea amphiploid and its progenitor diploid species. PLoS ONE 7, e29607.
7. Bassene JB, Froelicher Y, Dhuique-Mayer C, Mouhaya W., Ferrer RM, Ancillo G, Morillon R, Navarro L., Ollitrault P. 2009. Non-additive phenotypic and transcriptomic inheritance in a citrus allotetraploid somatic hybrid between C. reticulata and C. limon: the case of pulp carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. Plant Cell Reports 28, 1689-1697.
8. Bassene JB, Froelicher Y, Dubois C., Ferrer RM, Navarro L, Ollitrault P, Ancillo G. 2010. Non-additive gene regulation in a citrus allotetraploid somatic hybrid between C. reticulata Blanco and C. limon (L.) Burm. Heredity 105, 299-308.
9. Birchler JA. 2013. Genetic rules of heterosis in plants. In: Chen ZJ, Birchler JA, eds. Polyploid and hybrid genomics. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 313-321.
10. Birchler JA, Auger DL, Riddle NC 2003. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. The Plant Cell 15, 2236-2239.
11. Birchler JA, Riddle NC, Auger D.L., Veitia RA 2005. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends in Genetics 21, 219-226.
12. Birchler JA, Yao H, Chudalayandi S., Vaiman D, Veitia RA 2010. Heterosis. The Plant Cell 22, 2105-2112.
13. Burke JM, Arnold ML 2001. Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annual Review of Genetics 35, 31-52.
14. Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 836-846.
15. de Visser JAGM, Cooper TF, Elena SF. 2011. The causes of epistasis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 278, 3617-3624.
16. Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J. 2007. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316, 1862-1866.
17. Fieldman M, Levy AA, Fahima T, Korol A. 2012. Genomic asymmetry in allopolyploid plants: wheat as a model. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 5045-5059.
18. Gillespie J. 2004. Population genetics: a concise guide, 2nd edn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Gjuvsland AB, Vik JO, Woolliams J.A., Omholt SW 2011. Orderpreserving principles underlying genotype-phenotype maps ensure high additive proportions of genetic variance. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24, 2269-2279.
20. Grüning N.M., Lehrach H, Ralser M. 2010. Regulatory crosstalk of the metabolic network. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 35, 220-227.
21. Guo M, Davis D, Birchler JA 1996. Dosage effects on gene expression in a maize ploidy series. Genetics 142, 1349-1355.
22. Hayman BI, Mather K. 1955. The description of genic interactions in continuous variation. Biometrics 11, 69-82.
23. Jackson S, Chen ZJ 2010. Genomic and expression plasticity of polyploidy. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13, 153-159.
24. Jarosz DF, Taipale M, Lindquist S. 2010. Protein homeostasis and the phenotypic manifestation of genetic diversity: principles and mechanisms. Annual Review of Genetics 44, 189-216.
25. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, et al 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473, 97-100.
26. Jung C, Lelley T. 1985. Genetic interactions between wheat and rye genomes in triticale. 2. Morphological and yield characters. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 70, 427-432.
27. Kacser H, Burns JA 1981. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639-666.
28. Kong F, Mao S, Jiang J., Wang J, Fang X, Wang Y. 2011. Proteomic changes in newly synthesized Brassica napus allotetraploids and their early generations. Plant Molecular Biology Reports 29, 927-935.
29. Lenski RE, Ofria C, Collier T.C., Adami C. 1999. Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms. Nature 400, 661-664.
30. MacLean RC. 2010. Predicting epistasis: an experimental test of metabolic control theory with bacterial transcription and translation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, 488-493.
31. Mather K, Jinks JL 1982. Biometrical genetics, 3rd edn. London: Chapman and Hall.
32. Milborrow BV. 1998. A biochemical mechanism for hybrid vigour. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1063-1071.
33. Mizukami Y. 2001. A matter of size: developmental control of organ size in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4, 533-539.
34. Omholt S, Plahte E, Oyehaug L., Xiang K. 2000. Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis. Genetics 155, 969-980.
35. Orr HA. 1991. A test of Fisher theory of dominance. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 88, 11413-11415.
36. Otto SP. 2003. In polyploids, one plus one does not equal two. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 431-433.
37. Phillips PC. 2008. Epistasis - the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 855-867.
38. Pumphrey M, Bai J, Laudencia-Chingcuanco D, Anderson O., Gill BS 2009. Nonadditive expression of homoeologous genes is established upon polyploidization in hexaploid wheat. Genetics 181, 1147-1157.
39. Qi B, Huang W, Zhu B., et al 2012. Global transgenerational gene expression dynamics in two newly synthesized allohexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) lines. BMC Biology 10, 3.
40. Ramsey J, Schemske DW 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 589-639.
41. Roulin A, Auer PL, Libault M, Schlueter J., Farmer A, May G, Stacey G., Doerge RW, Jackson SA 2013. The fate of duplicated genes in a polyploid plant genome. The Plant Journal 73, 143-153.
42. Símová I, Herben T. 2012. Geometrical constraints in the scaling relationships between genome size, cell size and cell cycle length in herbaceous plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 279, 867-875.
43. Stanford EH, Clement WM, Bingham ET 1972. Cytology and evolution of the Medicago sativa-falcata complex. In: Hanson CH, ed. Alfalfa science and technology, Agronomy Monograph 15. Madison: American Society of Agronomy Inc., 87-101.
44. Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold.
45. Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z., Doyle F, Doyle J. 2004. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118, 675-685.
46. Strohman R. 2002. Maneuvering in the complex path from genotype to phenotype. Science 296, 701-703.
47. Sugiyama SI. 2005. Polyploidy and cellular mechanisms changing leaf size: comparison of diploid and autotetraploid populations in two species of Lolium. Annals of Botany 96, 931-938.
48. Szathmáry E. 1993. Do deleterious mutations interact synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer. Genetics 133, 127-132.
49. Veitia RA, Vaiman D. 2011. Exploring the mechanistic bases of heterosis from the perspective of macromolecular complexes. FASEB Journal 25, 476-482.
50. Wright S. 1934. Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. American Naturalist 67, 24-53.
51. Wu JH, Ferguson AR, Murray B.G., Jia Y., Datson PM, Zhang J. 2012. Induced polyploidy dramatically increases the size and alters the shape of fruit in Actinidia chinensis. Annals of Botany 109, 169-179.
52. Yang X, Ye CY, Cheng Z.M., Tschaplinski TJ, Wullschleger SD, Yin W, Xia X., Tuskan GA 2011. Genomic aspects of research involving polyploid plants. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 104, 387-397.
53. Yao H, Kato A, Mooney B., Birchler JA 2011. Phenotypic and gene expression analyses of a ploidy series of maize inbred Oh43. Plant Molecular Biology 75, 237-251.
54. Yoo MJ, Szadkowski E, Wendel JF 2013. Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploid cotton. Heredity 110, 171-180.
55. Zielinski ML, Mittelsten Scheid O. 2012. Meiosis in polyploid plants. In: Soltis PS, Soltis DE, eds. Polyploidy and genome evolution. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 33-55.