A 'good practice' guide for the reporting of design and analysis for psychometric evaluation

Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 449-455

  Martin, Colin R ^a,b   Savage McGlynn, Emily ^c  

^a BUCKINGHAMSHIRE NEW UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b WEST LONDON MENTAL HEALTH NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

psychometrics; psychosocial factors; quantitative methods

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; DEPRESSION; FACE VALIDITY; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOMETRY; PUERPERAL DEPRESSION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

EID: 84887959614     PISSN: 02646838     EISSN: 1469672X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2013.835036     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: The Guilford Press.
6. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
7. Cattell, R. B. (1966). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
8. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
9. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
10. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational, Inc.
11. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
12. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.
13. Kline, P. (2000). A psychometrics primer. London: Free Association Books.
14. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: what did they really say? Organisational Research Methods, 9, 202-220.
15. Newham, J., & Martin, C. R. (2013). Measuring fluctuations in maternal wellbeing and mood across pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, this issue.
16. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.
17. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
18. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Iowa City: Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society.
19. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.