Estuarine wetlands

Terrestrial Vegetation of California

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 124-154

  Grewell, Brenda J ^a   Callaway, John C ^b   Ferren Jr , Wayne R ^c  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887942268     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (209)

1. Abholt, I.A., and G.J. Hollenberg. 1976. Marine algae of California. Stanford University Press. Stanford, CA.
2. Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh ecology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
3. Adams, H.A. 1963. Factors influencing vascular plant zonation in North Carolina salt marshes. Ecology 44: 445-456.
4. Ahmad, I., F. Parher, and G.R. Stewart. 1979. Sorbitol, a compatible osmotic solute in Plantare) maritima. New Phytologist 82: 671-678.
5. Allen, A.O., and J.J. Feddema. 1996. Wetland loss and substitution by the Section 404 permit program in southern California, USA. Environmental Management 20: 263-274.
6. Allison, S.K. 1995. Recovery from small-scale anthropogenic distur¬bances by northern California salt marsh plant assemblages. Eco¬logical Applications 5: 693-702.
7. Alonghi, D.M. 1998. Coastal ecosystem processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
8. Anltila, CK., C.C. Daehler, N.E. Rank, et al. 1998. Greater male fit¬ness of a rare invader (Spartina altcrniflora, 1'oaceae) threatens a common native (Spartina foliosa) with hybridization. American Journal of Botany 85: 1597-1601.
9. Armstrong. W. 1979. Aeration in higher [liants. Advances in Botan¬ical Research 7: 225-232.
10. Armstrong, W., J. Armstrong, P.M. Beckett, et al. 1991. Convectivc gas-flows in wetland plant aeration. Pages 283-302 //;: M.B. Jackson, D.D. Davies, and H. I.ambers (eds.), Plant life under oxygen deprivation. SPB Academic Publishing, 'the Hague, Netherlands.
11. Atwater, B.F., S.G. Couard, J.N. Dowden, et al. 1979. History, land-forms, and vegetation of the estuary's tidal marshes. Pages 347-385 in: T.J. Conomos (ed.), San Francisco Bay: the urbanized estuary. Pacific Div., Am. Assoc, tor Adv. of Science. San Francisco, CA.
12. Atwater, B.I., C.W. Fiedel, and E.J. Helley. 1977. Fate Quaternary depositional history, Holocene sea level changes and vertical crust movement, southern San Francisco Bay, California. USGS Prof. Paper 1014.
13. Ayres, D.R., Ü. Garcia-Rossi, I EG. Davis, et al. 1999. Extent and degree of hybridization between exotic (Spartiua ulkrnifloni) and native (S. fuliosa) cordgrass (Poaceae) in California, USA deter¬mined by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs). Molecu¬lar Ecology 8: 1179-1 186.
14. Ball, P.W., A.A. Reznicek, and D.F. Murray. 2002. Cyperaceaejussieu, Sedge Family. Pages 3-608, in: Flora of North America, volume 23, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Barbour, M.G. 1970. Is any angiosperm an obligate halophvte? American Midland Naturalist 84: 105-120.
16. Barbour, M.G., R.B. Craig, E.R. Drysdale, et al. 1973. Coastal ecol¬ogy: Bodega Plead. University of California Press, Berkeley.
17. Barnhart, R.A., M.J. Boyd, and J.E. Pequegnat. 1992. 'the ecology of Humboldt Bay, California: and estuarine (Motile. USFWS Biologi¬cal Report 1. Washington, DC.
18. Baye, E.R., P.M. Faber, and B. Grewell. 2000. Tidal marsh plants of the San Francisco Estuary. Pages 9-33 in: P. R. Olofson (ed.). Bay-lands ecosystem species and community profiles: Fife histories and environmental requirements of key plants, fish and wildlife. Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, CA.
19. Bertness, M.D. 1991. Interspecific interactions among high marsh perennials in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 72: 125-137.
20. Bertness, M.D., and A.M. Ellison. 1987. Determinants of pattern in a New England salt marsh plant community. Ecological Mono¬graphs 57: 129-147.
21. Bertness, M.D., L. Cough, and S.W. Shumway. 1992. Salt tolerances and the distribution of fugitive salt marsh plants. Ecology 73: 1842-1851.
22. Bossard, C, and C. Benefield. 2000. Spartina an̂lica. Pages 300-303 in: CM. Bossard, J.M Randall, and M.C Hoshovsky (eds.), Inva¬sive plants of California's wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley.
23. Botkin, D.B., R.A. Nisbet, S. Bicknell, et al. 1991. Global climate change and California's natural ecosystems. Pages 123-149 in: J.B. Knox and A. E Schleuring (eds.), Global climate change and California: potential impacts and responses. University of Cali¬fornia Press, Berkeley.
24. Botkin, D., T. Reynales, and W. R. Ferren, Jr. eds. 1988. Environmen¬tal effects of a hazardous waste management facility, Phase I: Baseline environmental information for the Casmalia Resources Hazardous Waste Management Facility. Final Report to Santa Bar¬bara Health Care Services. UC, Santa Barbara, CA.
25. ßoyer, K.E., and J.B. Zedier. 1998. Effects of nitrogen additions on the vertical structure of a constructed cordgrass marsh. Ecological Applications 8: 692-705.
26. Brewer, J. P., J.M. I.evine, and M.D. Bertness. 1998. interactive effects of elevation and burial with wrack on plant community structure in some Rhode Island salt marshes. Journal of Ecology 86: 125-136.
27. Bricker-Urso, S., S.W. Nixon, J.K. Cochran, et al. 1989. Accretion rates and sediment accumulation in Rhodes Island salt marshes. Estuaries 12: 300-317.
28. Brown, A.M. 2000. Spartina patens. Pages 303-305 /'/;: CM. Bossard, J. M Randall, and M.C. Hoshovsky (eds.), Invasive plants of Cali¬fornia's wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley.
29. Brown, A.M., and C. Bledsoe. 1996. Spatial and temporal dynamics of mycorrhizas in faumea carnosa, a tidal saltmarsh halophyte. Journal of Ecology 84: 703-715.
30. Bruno, J.F. 2000. Facilitation of cobble beach communities through habitat modification by Spartina alterniflom. Ecology 81: 1179-1192.
31. Bruno, J. R., and C.W. Kennedy. 2000. Reduction of wave-related dis¬turbance in cobble beach habitats by Sparlina altewiflora. Oecolo-gia 122: 98-108.
32. Burdick, D.M., and I.A. Mendelssohn. 1987. Waterlogging response in dune, swale, and marsh populations of Spartina païens under field conditions. Oecologia 74: 321-329.
33. Cahoon, D.R., J.C. Lynch, and A.N. Powell. 1996. Marsh vertical accretion in a southern California estuary, U.S.A. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 43: 19-32.
34. Callaway, J.C, and M.N. Josselyn. 1992. The introduction and spread of smooth cordgrass (Sparlina altemiflora) in south San Francisco Bay. Estuaries 15: 218-226.
35. Callaway, J.C, and J.B. Zedier. 1998. Interactions between a salt marsh native perennial (Salicornia virginica) and an exotic annual (Polypogon monspeiiensis) under varied salinity and hydroperiod. Wetlands Ecology and Management 5: 1 79-194.
36. Callaway, J.C, and J.B. Zedier. 2004. Restoration of urban salt marshes: Lessons from southern California. Urban Ecosystems 7: 107-124.
37. Callaway, J.C, R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1997. Sediment accretion rates from four coastal wetlands along the Gulf of Mex¬ico. Journal of Coastal Research 13: 181-191.
38. Callaway, J.C, J.A. Nyman, and R.D. DeLaune. 1996. Sediment accretion in coastal wetlands: A review and a simulation model of processes. Current Topics in Wetland Biogeochemistry 2: 2-23.
39. Callaway, J.C, G. Sullivan, and J.B. Zedier. 2003. Species-rich plant¬ings increase biomass and nitrogen accumulation in a wetland restoration experiment. Ecological Applications 13: 1626-1639.
40. Callaway, R.M. 1994. Facilitative and interfering effects of Arthroc-nemum subterminale on winter annuals. Ecology 75: 681-686.
41. Callaway, R.M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. Botanical Review 61: 306-349.
42. Callaway, R.M., S. Jones, W.R. Ferren Jr., et al. 1990. Ecology of a mediterranean-climate estuarine wetland at Carpinteria, Califor¬nia: plant distributions and soil salinity in the upper marsh. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 1139-1146.
43. Casey, W. IL, A. Guber, C. Bursey, et al. 1986. Chemical controls on ecology in a coastal wetland. EOS 67: 1305, 1310-1311.
44. Castellanos, E.M., M.E. Figueroa, and P.L. Wolf. 1994. Nucleation and facilitation in saltmarsh succession: Interactions between Spartina maritima and Arthrocnemum perenne. Journal of Ecology 82: 239-248.
45. Cayan, D.R., S.A. Kammerdiener, M.D. Dettinger, et al. 2001. Changes in the onset of spring in the western United States. Bul¬letin of the American Meteorological Society 82: 399-415.
46. Chapman, V.J. 1974. Salt marshes and salt deserts of the world, 2nd Ed. J. Cramer, Berlin, Germany.
47. CNPS. 2005. California Native Plant Society's inventory of rare and endangered plants of California. Special publication #1, 6th Edi¬tion. Sacramento, CA.
48. Cohen, A.N., and J.T. Carlton. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555-558.
49. Conomos, T.J., R.E. Smith, and J.W. Gartner. 1985. Environmental setting of San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia 129: 1-12.
50. Cooper, A. 1982. The effects of salinity and waterlogging on growth and cation uptakeof salt marsh plants. New Phytologist 90: 263-275.
51. Costa, S.L., and K.A. Glatzel. 2002. Humboldt Bay, California, Entrance Channel. Report 1 Data Review. Coastal Inlets Research Program, USACE/ERDC/CHLCR-02-1.
52. Covin, J. D., and J.B. Zedier. 1988. Nitrogen effects on Spartina fol i osa and Salicornia virginica in the salt marsh at Tijuana Estuary, Cali¬fornia. Wetlands 8: 51-65.
53. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, et al. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79-31. 103 pp.
54. Daehler, C.C., and D.R. Strong. 1995. Impact of high herbivore den¬sities on introduced smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflom, invad¬ing San Francisco Bay, CA. Estuaries 18: 409-417.
55. Daehler, C.C., and D.R. Strong. 1996. Status, prediction and pre¬vention of introduced cordgrass (Spartina spp.) invasions in Pacific estuaries, USA. Biological Conservation 78: 51-58.
56. Dahl, T.E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States, 1780's to 1980's. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
57. Davies, J.L. 1980. Geographical variation in coastal development. 2nd. Edition. Longman. London, UK.
58. Dawes, C.J. 1998. Marine botany, Wiley, New York.
59. Day, Jr., J. W., C.A.S. Hall, and W.M. Kemp. 1989. Estuarine ecology, Wiley, New York.
60. Dejong, T.M., B.C. Drake, and R.W. Pearcy. 1982. Gas exchange response of Chesapeake Bay tidal marsh species under field and laboratory conditions. Oecologia 52: 5-11.
61. Dettinger, M.D. 2005. From climate change spaghetti to climate-change distributions for 21sl Century California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 3(1) Article 4. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol3.issl.art4
62. Eicher, A.L. 1987. Salt marsh vascular plant distribution in relation to tidal elevation, Humboldt Bay, California. M.A. thesis, Hum¬boldt State University, Areata, CA. 45pp.
63. Eicher, A.L., and C. Geldin-Meyers. 1988. Vegetation survey of the Lake Earl Wildlife Area, Del Norte County, CA. Report to California F)ept. of Fish and Game, Eureka, CA. 15 pp. and 2 Appendices.
64. Ellison, A.M. 1987. Effects of competition, disturbance, and her-bivory on Salicornia europaea. Ecology 68: 576-586.
65. Emmett, R.L., R. Llanso, J.A. Newton, et al. 2000. Geographic signa¬tures of North American west coast estuaries. Estuaries 23: 765-792.
66. Fellows, M.Q.N., and J.B. Zedier. 2005. Effects of the non-native grass, Parapholis incurva (Poaceae) on the rare and endangered hemiparasite, Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus (Scrophulari-aceae). Madrono 52: 91-98.
67. Fink, B., and J.B. Zedler. 1989. Maximizing growth of Conlyhmtluts iihiritinius ssp. imiritimus, an endangered salt marsh plant. Progress Report for the California Department of Transportation (Interagency Agreement # 11B351.26). November 20, 1989.
68. Ferren W.R. Jr. 1985. Carpinteria Salt Marsh: Environment, his¬tory, and botanical resources of a southern California estuary. University of California, Santa Barbara, Herbarium Publication No. 4.
69. Ferren, W.R. Jr. 1990. Recent research on and new management issues lor southern California estuarine wetlands. Pp. 55-79 in: Endangered plant communities of Southern California (A. A. Schoenherr, ed.), Southern California Botanists Publication No. 3.
70. Ferren, W.R. Jr., and K. Rindlaub. 1983. Botanical resources. /'/;: Nat¬ural resources of the Santa Barbara Municipal Airport and vicinity including Coleta Slough (C. Woodhouse and K. Rindlaub, eds.). Technical Report for the Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
71. Ferren, W.R. Jr., and S.A. Whitmore. 1983. Suaeda estewa (Chenopo-diaceae), a new species from estuaries of southern California and Baja California. Madrono 30: 181-190.
72. Ferren, W.R. Jr., J. Bleck, and N. Vivrette. 1981. Malepliom crocea (Aizoaceae) naturalized in California. Madrono 28: 80-85.
73. Ferren, W.R. Jr., M.H. Capelli, A. Parikh, et al. 1990. Botanical resources at Emma Wood State Beach and the Ventura River Estu¬ary, California: Inventory and Management. Ehe Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara. Environmental Report No. 15. Santa Barbara, CA.
74. Ferren, W.R., P. E Fiedler, and R.A. Eeidy. 1995. Wetlands of the cen¬tral and southern California coast and coastal watersheds: A methodology for their classification and description. Final report to US-EPA, Region IX, San Francisco, CA. http://ucjeps.berkeley. edu/wetlands
75. Ferren, W.R. Jr., P.E. Fiedler, and R.A. Eeidy. 1996a. Wetlands of Cal¬ifornia, Part I: History of wetland habitat classification. Madrono 43: 105-124.
76. Ferren, W.R. Jr., P. 1, Fiedler, R.A. Eeidy, et al. 1996b. Wetlands of California, Part II: Classification and description of wetlands of the central and southern California coast and coastal watersheds. Madrono 43: 125-182.
77. Ferren, W.R. Jr., P.E. Eeidy, R.A. Eeidy, et al. 1996c. Wetlands of Cal¬ifornia, Part III: Key to and catalogue of wetlands of the central and southern California coast and coastal watersheds. Madrono 43: 183-233.
78. Fiedler, P.E. and M. Keever. 2003. Geographic distribution and pop¬ulation parameters of the endangered Suisun thistle (Cirsium hydrophilum var. hydrophilum) at Rush Ranch in Solano County, California. E.G. Fee (Si Assoc, final report to Solano County Water Agency.
79. Fletcher, G. and M. Wetherwax. 1998. Noteworthy Collections Cali¬fornia: Custilh'jii umbigna ssp. luimbohltiensis. Madrono 45: 326.
80. Foin, I.C., J. Garcia F., R.E. Gill, et al. 1997. Recovery strategies for the California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoh'tus) in the heavily-urbanized San Francisco estuarine ecosystem. Landscape and Urban Planning 38: 229-243.
81. Gabel, E.J. 1998. Lateral migration and bank erosion in a saltmarsh tidal channel in San Francisco Bay, California. Estuaries 21: 745-753.
82. Gambrell, R.P., and W.U. Patrick, Jr. 1978. Chemical and microbio¬logical properties of anaerobic soils and sediments. Pages 375-423 in: D.D. Hood and R.M.M. Crawford (eds.), Plant life in anaero¬bic environments. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI.
83. Ganong, W. F. 1903. 'Ehe vegetation of the Bay of F'undy salt and diked marshes: and ecological study. Botanical Gazette 36: 161-186, 280-302, 350-367, 429-455.
84. Goals Project. 1999. Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals. A report of habitat recommendations prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA/S.F. Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, CA.
85. Greer, K., and D. Stow. 2003. Vegetation type conversion in Eos Penas-quitos Lagoon, California: An examination of the role of watershed urbanization. Environmental Management 31: 489-503.
86. Grewell, B.J. 2006. Hemiparasites generate environmental hetero¬geneity that enhances species coexistence in northern California salt marshes (in review).
87. Grewell, B.J. 2004. Species diversity in northern California salt marshes: functional significance of parasitic plant interactions. Ph.D. dissertation in Ecology, University of California, Davis.
88. Grewell, B.J., M.A. DaPrato, E.R. Hyde, et al. 2003. Reintroduction of Endangered Soft Bird's Beak (Conlyhmthus mollis ssp. mollis) to Restored Habitat in Suisun Marsh. Department of Environmental Science & Policy, University of California, Davis. Contract 99-N05 Final Report to CALLED Ecosystem Restoration Program.
89. Grosse, W., H.B. Buchel, and H. Tiebel. 1991. Pressurized ventilation in wetland plants. Aquatic Botany 39: 89-98.
90. Hacker, S.D., and M.D. Bertness. 1995. Morphological and physio¬logical consequences of a postitive plant interaction. American Naturalist 148: 559-575.
91. Halstead, B.G., and R. Guadagno. 2001. 'Ehe value and overlooked diversity of restored salt marsh. Unpublished report. Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, USFWS, Eureka, CA.
92. Hanson, E. A. 2000. Plants of shallow and subtidal habitat and tidal flats (with emphasis on eelgrass). Pages 1-8 in: RR. Olofson (ed.), Bay-lands ecosystem species and community profiles: Life histories and environmental requirements of key plants, fish and wildlife. Pre¬pared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Pro¬ject. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oak¬land, CA.
93. Matton, R.S., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1983. Sedimenta¬tion, accretion, and subsidence in marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana. Limnology and Oceanography 28: 494-502.
94. Hehnke, M. 1969. Bay and Estuary Report: Big Lagoon, Stone Lagoon, Freshwater Lagoon, Lake Earl, Lake 'Ealawa. California Dept. of Fish and Game Report.
95. Hickman, J.C. ed. 1993. TheJepson manual: Higher plants of Califor¬nia. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
96. Hinde, H. P. 1954. The vertical distribution of salt marsh phanerogams in relation to tide levels. Ecological Monographs 24: 209-225.
97. Huspeni, T.C, and K.D. Lafferty. 2004. Using larval nematodes that parasitize snails to evaluate a salt-marsh restoration project. Eco¬logical Applications 14: 795-804.
98. Hutchinson, G.E. 1975. A treatise on limnology. Vol III. Limnologi-cal botany. Wiley, New York.
99. 1PCC. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2001. Climate change 2001: 'Ehe scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
100. Jefferies, R.L. 1981. Osmotic adjustment and the response of halo-phytic plants to salinity. BioScience 31: 42-46.
101. Josselyn, M. 1983. The ecology of San Francisco Bay tidal marshes: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Biological Services, Washington, DC.
102. Josselyn, M.N., and J.W. Buchholz. 1984. Marsh restoration in San Francisco Bay: A guide to design and planning. Paul F. Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, Tiburon, CA.
103. Keer, G. H., and J.B. Zedier. 2002. Salt marsh canopy architecture dif¬fers with the number and composition of species. Ecological Applications 12: 456-473.
104. Kelly, J.P., and G. Fletcher. 1994. Habitat correlates and distribution of Cordylanthus maritimus (Scrophulariaceae) on Tomales Bay, Cal¬ifornia. Madrono 41: 316-327.
105. Kittleson, P.M., and M.J. Boyd. 1997. Mechanisms of expansion for an introduced species of cordgrass, Spartina densiflora, in Hum¬boldt Bay, California. Estuaries 20: 770-778.
106. Knowles, N., and D.R. Cayan. 2002. Potential effects of global warm¬ing on the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed and the San Fran¬cisco estuary: Geophysical Research Letters 29: 1-5.
107. Kuhn, N.L., and J.B. Zedier. 1997. Differential effects of salinity and soil saturation on native and exotic plants of a coastal salt marsh. Estuaries 20: 391-403.
108. Langis, R., M. Zalejko, and J.B. Zedier. 1991. Nitrogen assessment in a constructed and a natural salt marsh of San Diego Bay. Ecologi¬cal Applications 1: 40-51.
109. Leopold, L.B., J.N. Collins, and L.M. Collins. 1993. Hydrology of some tidal channels in estuarine marshland near San Francisco. Catena 20: 469-493.
110. Macdonald, K.B. 1977. Coastal salt marsh. Pages 263-294 in: M.G. Barbour and J. Major (eds.), Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
111. Macdonald, K.B., and M.G. Barbour. 1974. Beach and salt marsh vegetation of the North American Pacific coast. Pages 175-233 in: R.T. Reimold and W.H. Queen (eds.), Ecology of halophytes. Aca¬demic Press, New York.
112. Madon, S.P., G.D. Williams, J.M. West, et al. 2001. The importance of marsh access to growth of the California killifish, Fimdulits parvipinnis, evaluated through bioenergetics modeling. Ecological Modelling 136: 149-165.
113. Mahall, B.E., and R.B. Park. 1976a. The ecotone between Spartina foliosa Trin. and Salicornia virginica L. in salt marshes of northern San Fran¬cisco Bay: I. Biomass and production. Journal of Ecology 64: 421-433.
114. Mahall, B.E., and R.B. Park. 1976b. The ecotone between Spartina foliosa Trin. and Salicornia virginica L. in salt marshes of northern San Francisco Bay: II. Soil water and salinity. Journal of Ecology 64: 793-809.
115. Mahall, B.E., and R.B. Park. 1976c. The ecotone between Spartina foliosa Trin. and Salicornia virginica L. in salt marshes of northern San Francisco Bay: III. Soil aeration and tidal immersion. Journal of Ecology 64: 811-819.
116. Matern, S.A., P.B. Moyle, and L.C Pierce. 2002. Native and alien fishes in a California estuarine marsh: Twenty-one years of chang¬ing assemblages. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 797-816.
117. Mausbach, M.J., and J.L Richardson. 1994. Biogeochemical processes in hydric soil formation. Current Topics in Wetland Bio-geochemistry 1: 68-127.
118. Mendelssohn, I.A., and K.L. McKee. 2000. Saltmarshes and man¬groves. Pp. 501-536 in: North American vegetation (M.G. Barbour and W.D. Billings, eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York.
119. Mendelssohn, I.A., K.L. McKee, and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1981. Oxygen deficiency in Spartina altemiflora roots: Metabolic adaptation to anoxia. Science 214: 439-441.
120. Mitsch, W.J., and J.G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands. 3rd Edition. Wiley, New York.
121. Mitsch, W.J., X.Y. Wu, R.W. Nairn, et al. 1998. Creating and restor¬ing wetlands: a whole-ecosystem experiment in self-design. Bio-Science 48: 1019-1030.
122. Montalvo, A.M., S.L. Williams, K.J. Rice, et al. 1997. Restoration biology: A population biology perspective. Restoration Ecology 5: 277-290.
123. Mooney, H.A., and R.J. Hobbs. 2000. Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC.
124. Morris, J.T. 1982. A model of growth responses of Spartina altemi¬flora to nitrogen limitation. Journal of Ecology 70: 25-42.
125. Morris, J.T, P. V. Sundareshwar, CT. Nietch, et al. 2002. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83: 2869-2877.
126. Mudie, P.J., and R. Byrne. 1980. Pollen evidence for historic sedi¬mentation rates in California coastal marshes. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 10: 305-316.
127. Newcombe, C.L., and H. Mason. 1979. An environmental inventory of the North Bay-Stockton ship channel area. San Francisco Bay Marine Research Center. 2 volumes.
128. Newton, G.A. 1982. Vegetation analysis and map of Elk River Wildlife Area. 1982 Baseline Study. Humboldt State University Foundation prepared for City of Eureka, CA.
129. NOAA. 2003. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service tide predictions and observations. CO-OPS, Silver Spring, MD. http://www.co-ops.nos.noaa .gov/ tides03/tab2wcla.html.
130. Noe, G.B., and J.B. Zedier. 2000. Differential effects of four abiotic factors on the germination of salt marsh annuals. American Jour¬nal of Botany 87: 1679-1692.
131. Noe, G.B., and J.B. Zedier. 2001a. Spatio-temporal variation of salt marsh seedling establishment in relation to the abiotic and biotic environment. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 61-74.
132. Noe, G.B., and J.B. Zedier. 2001b. Variable rainfall limits the germi¬nation of upper intertidal marsh plants in southern California. Estuaries 24: 30-40.
133. Nuttle, W.K., M.M. Brinson, D. Cahoon, et al. 1997. Conserving coastal wetlands despite sea level rise. EOS 78: 257, 260-261.
134. Nyman, J.A., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1990. Wetland soil formation in the rapidly subsiding Mississippi River Deltaic Plain: Mineral and organic matter relationships. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 31: 57-69.
135. Odum, W. E. 1988. Comparative ecology of tidal fresh-water and salt marshes. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 147-176.
136. Onuf, C.P. 1987. The ecology of Mugu Lagoon, California: an estu¬arine profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
137. Orcutt, D.M., and E.T Nielson. 2000. The physiology of plants under stress: soil and biotic factors. Wiley, New York.
138. Parsons, L.S., and J.B. Zedier. 1997. Factors affecting reestablishment of an endangered annual plant at a California salt marsh. Ecolog¬ical Applications 7: 253-267.
139. Patrick, W.H. Jr., and R.D. DeLaune. 1972. Characterization of the oxidized and reduced zones in flooded soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 36: 573-576.
140. Patrick, W.H. Jr., and R.D. DeLaune. 1990. Subsidence, accretion, and sea level rise in south San Francisco Bay marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 1389-1395.
141. Pavlik, B.M. 1994. Demographic monitoring and the recovery of endangered plants. Pages 322-350 in: M. Bowles, and C. Whelan (eds.), Recovery and restoration of endangered species. Cam¬bridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
142. Pavlik, B.M. 1996. Defining and measuring success in rare plant reintroductions. Pages 127-156 in: D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell (eds.), Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction oi rare plants. Island Press, Washington, DC.
143. Pavlik, B.M. 2004. Looking ahead: Rare plant conservation in California. Pages 203-210 in: M.B. Brooks, S.K. Carothers, and 'I'. LaBanca (eds.), The ecology and management of rare plants of northwestern California: Proceedings from a symposium of the north coast chapter of the California Native Plant Society. Sacra¬mento, CA.
144. Pearcy, R.W., and Ustin, S. L. 1984. Effects of salinity and growth and pho¬tosynthesis of three California tidal marsh species. Oecologia 62: 68-73.
145. Peinado, M., F. Alcaraz, J. Delgadillo, et al. 1994. The coastal salt marshes of California and Baja California: phytosociological typology and zonation. Vegetatio 110: 55-66.
146. Penfield and Smith. 1996a. Hydraulic Alternatives Analysis for the Carpinteria Marsh Restoration Project. Prepared for Santa Barbara County Flood Control District.
147. Pennings, S.C, and M.D. Bertness. 1999. Using latitudinal varia¬tion to examine effects of climate on coastal salt marsh pattern and process. Current Topics in Wetland Biogeochemistry 3: 100-111.
148. Pennings, S.C, and M.D. Bertness. 2001. Salt marsh communities. Pages 289-316 in: M.D. Bertness, S.D. Gaines, and M.E. Hay (eds.), Marine community ecology. Sinauer Assoc. Sunderland, MA.
149. Pennings, S.C., and R.M. Callaway. 1992. Salt marsh plant zonation: The relative importance of competition and physical factors. Ecology 73: 681-690.
150. Pennings, S.C and R.M. Callaway. 1996. Impact of a parasitic plant on the structure and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation. Ecology 77: 1410-1419.
151. Pennings, S.C, and R.M. Callaway. 2002. Parasitic plants: parallels and contrasts with herbivores. Oecologia 131: 479-489.
152. Pestrong, R. 1965. The development of drainage patterns on tidal marshes. Stanford University, School of Earth Sciences, Stanford, CA.
153. Pestrong, R. 1972. Tidal flat sedimentation at Cooley Landing, southwest San Francisco Bay. Sedimentary Geology 8: 251-288.
154. Peterson, D.H., D.R. Cayan, M.D. Dettinger, et al. 1996. San Fran¬cisco Bay salinity: observations, numerical simulations, and sta¬tistical models. Pages 9-34 in:).T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The ecosystem. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, California Academy of Sciences. San Francisco.
155. Pickart, A. 2001a. Humboldt County's salt marshes. North Coast Chapter of the California Native Plant Society. Unpublished report.
156. Pickart, A. 2001b. 'Fhe distribution oi Spartina densiflora and two rare salt marsh plants in Humboldt Bay 1998-1999. USFWS Unpub¬lished technical report.
157. Purer, E. B. 1942. Plant ecology of the coastal salt marshlands of San Diego County. Ecological Monographs 12: 82-111.
158. PWA (Phillip Williams and Associates Ltd.) and P.M. Faber. 2004. Design guidelines for tidal wetland restoration in San Francisco Bay. 'Fhe Bay Institute and the California State Coastal Conser¬vancy, Oakland. Available at: http://www.wrmp.org/
159. Randall, J.M. and M.C. Hoshovsky. 2000. Atriplex semibaccata. Pp. 59-61 in: Invasive Plants of California's Wild Lands (CM. Bossard, J.M Randall, and M.C. Hoshovsky, eds.). University of California Press. Berkeley.
160. Ranwell, D.S. 1972. Ecology of Salt Marshes and Sand Dunes. Chap¬man and Hall, London UK.
161. Reddy, K.R., W.H. Patrick Jr., and C.W. Lindau. 1989. Nitrification-denitrification at the plant root-sediment interface in wetlands. Limnology and Oceanography 24: 1004-1013.
162. Reed, D.J. 2002. Understanding tidal marsh sedimentation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. Journal of Coastal Research 36: 605-611.
163. Reed, D.J. 1990. The impact of sea-level rise on coastal salt marshes. Progress in Physical Geography 14: 465-481.
164. Rindlaub, K.D. Capralis, and W.R. Ferren Jr. 1985. Botanical resources of the Santa Maria River Mouth and Estuary. Prepared for Abalone Unlimited. The Herbarium, Dept. of Biological Sci¬ences, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA.
165. Rozema, J., H. Gude, F. Bijl, et al. 1981. Sodium concentration in xylem sap in relation to ion exlusion, accumulation and secretion in halophytes. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 30: 309-311.
166. Sanderson, E.W., S.L. Ustin, and T.C. Foin. 2000. The influence of tidal channels on the distribution of salt marsh plant species in Petaluma Marsh, CA, USA. Plant Ecology 146: 29-41.
167. Sawyer, J.O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of the vegetation of California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
168. Scavia, Ü., J.C Field, D.F. Boesch, et al. 2002. Climate change impacts on US coastal and marine ecosystems. Estuaries 25: 149-164.
169. Schoenherr, A.A. 1992. A Natural History of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
170. Schwartz, D.L., H.Y. Mullins, and D.F. Belknap. 1986. Holocene geo¬logic history of a transform margin estuary: Elkhorn Slough, Cen¬tral California. Estuarinc, Coastal, and Shelf Science 22: 285-302.
171. Sculthrope, CD. 1967. The biology of aquatic vascular plants. St. Martin's Press, New York.
172. Seliskar, D.M., and J.L. Gallagher. 1983. The ecology of tidal marshes of the Pacific Northwest: a community profile. FWS/OBS-82-83 Washington, DC.
173. SFEP. (San Francisco Estuary Project). 1991. San Francisco Estuary Project status and trends report on wetlands and related habitats in the San Francisco Estuary. ABAG Public report to US-EPA, Oak¬land, CA.
174. Shellhammer, H.S. 1989. Salt-marsh harvest mice, urban-develop¬ment, and rising sea levels. Conservation Biology 3: 59-65.
175. Smith, CF. 1998. A flora of the Santa Barbara region, California (2nd ed.). Santa Barnara Botanic Garden and Capra Press, Santa Bar¬bara, CA.
176. Spencer, D.F., and G.G. Ksander. 1997. Influence of anoxia on sprouting of vegetative propagules of three species of aquatic plant propagules. Wetlands 17: 55-64.
177. Spicher, D., and M. Josselyn. 1985. Spartina (Gramineae) in northern California: Distribution and taxonomie notes. Madrono 32: 158-167.
178. Stevenson, J.C-, L.G. Ward, and M.S. Kearney. 1986. Vertical accre¬tion in marshes with varying rates of sea level rise. Pages 241-259 in: D.A. Wolfe (ed.), F.stuarine variability. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
179. Stewart, G.R., and J. A. Lee. 1974. The role of praline accumulation in halophytes. Planta 120: 279-289.
180. Streever, W., and J.B. Zedier. 2000. To plant or not to plant? Bio-Science 50: 188-189.
181. Srivastava, D.S., and R.L. Jefferies. 1996. A positive feedback: Her-bivory, plant growth, salinity and the desertification of an Arctic salt marsh. Journal of Ecology 84: 31-42.
182. Teal, J.M., and J.W. Kanwisher. 1966. Gas transport in a marsh grass Spartina alterniflora. Journal of Experimental Botany 1 7: 355-361.
183. Titus, J.G. 1991. Greenhouse effect and coastal wetland policy: How Americans could abandon an area the size of Massachusetts at minimum cost. Environmental Management 15: 39-58.
184. Ungar, I.A. 1978. Halophyte seed germination. Botanical Review 44: 233-264.
185. Ungar, I.A. 1982. Germination ecology of halophytes. Pages 143-154 in: D.N. Sen and K. Rajpurohit (eds.), Contribution to the ecology of halophytes. Dr. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands.
186. Ungar, I.A. 1991. Ecophysiology of vascular halophytes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
187. Ungar, I.A. 1998. Are biotic factors significant in influencing the dis¬tribution of halophytes in saline habitats? Botanical Review 64: 176-199.
188. Vepraskas, M.J., and S.R Faulkner. 2001. Redox chemistry of hydric soils. Pages 85-105 in: ].L. Richarson and M.J. Vepraskas (eds.), Wetland soils: genesis, hydrology, landscapes and classification. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
189. Vivian-Smith, G. 1997. Microtopographic heterogeneity and floris-tic diversity in experimental wetland communities. Journal of Ecology 85: 71-82.
190. Vivian-Smith, G. 2001. Developing a framework for restoration. Pages 39-88 in: J.B. Zedier (ed.). Handbook for restoring tidal wet¬lands. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
191. Waisel, Y. 1972. The biology of halophytes. Academic Press. New York.
192. Wallace, K.J., J.C. Callaway, and J.B. Zedier. 2005. Evolution of tidal creek networks in a high sedimentation environment: A 5-year experiment at Tijuana Estuary, California. Estuaries 28: 795-811.
193. Ward, K.M., J.C. Callaway, and J.B. Zedier. 2003. Episodic coloniza¬tion of an intertidal mudflat by native cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) at Tijuana Estuary. Estuaries 26: 116-130.
194. Weis, D.A., J.C. Callaway, and R.M. Gersberg. 2001. Vertical accre¬tion rates and heavy metal chronologies in wetland sediments of the Tijuana Estuary. Estuaries 24: 840-850.
195. Welsh, S.L., C.W. Compton, and S.E. Clemants. 2003. Chenopodi-aceae Ventenat, Goosefoot Family. Pages 258-404 in: Flora of North America, volume 4, Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 1. Oxford University Press, New York.
196. Williams, P.B., and M.K. Orr. 2002. Physical evolution of restored breached levee salt marshes in the San Francisco Bay estuary. Restoration Ecology 10: 527-542.
197. Welsh, S.L., C.W. Compton, and S.E. Clemants. 2003. Chenopodi-aceae Ventenat, Goosefoot Family. Pages 258-404, in: Flora of North America, volume 4, Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 1. Oxford University Press, New York.
198. Wyn Jones, R.G., and R. Storey. 1981. Betaines. Pages 172-204 in: L.G. Paleg and D. Aspinall (eds.), The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia.
199. Young, J. A., and C.E. Turner. 1995. Lepidium latifolium L. in Cali¬fornia. California Exotic Plant Pest Council News 3: 4-5.
200. Zedier, J.B. 1982. The ecology of southern California coastal salt marshes: A community profile. United States Department of Inte¬rior, Washington, DC.
201. Zedier, J.B. 1993. Canopy architecture of natural and planted cord-grass marshes: Selecting habitat evaluation criteria. Ecological Applications 3: 123-138.
202. Zedier, J.B. 1996. Coastal mitigation in southern California: The need for a regional restoration strategy. Ecological Applications 6: 84-93.
203. Zedier, J.B., ed. 2001. Handbook for restoring tidal wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
204. Zedier, J.B., and P.A. Beare. 1986. Temporal variability of salt marsh vegetation: The role of low-salinity gaps and environmental stress. Pages 295-306 in: D.A. Wolfe (ed.), Estuarine variability. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
205. Zedier, J.B., CS. Nordby, and B.E. Kus 1992. The ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: A National Estuarine Research Reserve. NOAA Office of Coastal Resource Management, Sanctuaries and Reserves Division, Washington, DC.
206. Zedier, J.B., J.C. Callaway, and G. Sullivan. 2001. Declining biodiver¬sity: Why species matter and how their functions might be restored in Californian tidal marshes. Bioscience 51: 1005-1017.
207. Zedier, J.B., J.C. Callaway, J.S. Desmond, et al. 1999. Californian salt marsh vegetation: An improved model of spatial pattern. Ecosys¬tems 2: 19-35.
208. Zedier, J.B., T. Winfield, and P. Williams. 1980. Salt marsh productivity with natural and altered tidal circulation. Oecologia 44: 236-240.
209. Zembal, R., B.W. Massey, and J.M. Fancher. 1989. Movements and Activity Patterns of the Light-Footed Clapper Rail. Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 39-42.