The Complex Systems of Practice

Professional and Practice-based Learning

Volumn 8, Issue , 2012, Pages 119-131

  Lancaster, Jeanette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Affective Functioning; Affective Processing; Complex Relation; Human Practice; Practical Understanding

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887934276     PISSN: 22105549     EISSN: 22105557     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Cilliers, P. (2002). Why we cannot know complex things completely. Emergence, 4(1/2), 77–84.
2. Cilliers, P. (2005). Knowledge, limits and boundaries. Futures, 37, 605–613.
3. Cilliers, P. (2006). On the importance of a certain slowness. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(3), 105–112.
4. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1989). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works 1949–1952 (Vol. 16, pp. 2–294). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
5. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
6. Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional ‘trans-action’: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(4), 275–296.
7. Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72.
8. Hager, P. (1996). Relational realism and professional performance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 28(1), 98–116.
9. Heylighen, F., Cilliers, P., & Gershenson, C. (2005). Complexity and philosophy. Paper presented at the Complexity, Science and Society Conference, Liverpool, UK. Citation: uk.arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0604/0604072.pdf. Accessed Aug 2010.
10. Lancaster, J. (2011). The complexity of learning: relations all the way down. Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology, Sydney.
11. Lewis, M. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71(1), 36–43.
12. Manson, S. (2001). Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32, 405–414.
13. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.
14. Mikulecky, D. (2001). The emergence of complexity: Science coming of age or science growing old? Computers and Chemistry, 25, 341–348.
15. Porter, T. (2003). Measurement, objectivity, and trust. Measurement, 1(4), 241–255.
16. Schatzki, T. (2001a). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Shatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). London: Routledge.
17. Schatzki, T. (2001b). Practice mind-ed orders. In T. R. Shatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). London: Routledge.
18. Schore, A. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 7–66.
19. Seidl, D. (2007). The dark side of knowledge. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 9(3), 16–29.