Resource limitation in a competitive context determines complex plant responses to experimental resource additions

Ecology

Volumn 94, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2505-2517

  Farrior, Caroline E ^a   Tilman, David ^b   Dybzinski, Ray ^a   Reich, Peter B ^b,c   Levin, Simon A ^a   Pacala, Stephen W ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Liebig's law of the minimum; Multiple resource limitation hypothesis; Nitrogen; Plant competition; Resource limitation; Water

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; BIOMASS; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FRACTIONATION; LIMITING FACTOR; NITROGEN; NUTRIENT LIMITATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PREDICTION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOIL MOISTURE;

EID: 84887910162     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/12-1548.1     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adler, P. B., J. HilleRisLambers, P. C. Kyriakidis, Q. Guan, and J. M. Levine. 2006. Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on the coexistence of prairie grasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 12793-12798.
2. Aerts, R., R. G. A. Boot, and P. J. M. van der Aart. 1991. The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87: 551-559.
3. Agren, G. I., J. A. M. Wetterstedt, and M. F. K. Billberger. 2012. Nutrient limitation on terrestrial plant growth - modeling the interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus. New Phytologist 194: 953-960.
4. Bloom, A. J., F. S. Chapin, III, and H. A. Mooney. 1985. Resource limitation in plants - an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363-392.
5. Borken, W., and E. Matzner. 2009. Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Global Change Biology 15: 808-824.
6. Chapin, F. S., III, 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 233-260.
7. Chapin, F. S., III, A. J. Bloom, C. B. Field, and R. H. Waring. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors: physiological ecology provides tools for studying how interacting environmental resources control plant growth. BioScience 37: 49-57.
8. Collatz, G. J., J. T. Ball, C. Grivet, and J. A. Berry. 1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54: 107-136.
9. Craine, J. M. 2006. Competition for nutrients and optimal root allocation. Plant and Soil 285: 171-185.
10. Craine, J. M., J. Fargione, and S. Sugita. 2005. Supply preemption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytologist 166: 933-940.
11. Danger, M., T. Daufresne, F. Lucas, S. Pissard, and G. Lacroix. 2008. Does Liebig's law of the minimum scale up from species to communities? Oikos 117: 1741-1751.
12. Dybzinski, R., C. Farrior, A. Wolf, P. B. Reich, and S. W. Pacala. 2011. Evolutionarily stable strategy carbon allocation to foliage, wood, and fine roots in trees competing for light and nitrogen: an analytically tractable, individual-based model and quantitative comparisons to data. American Naturalist 177: 153-166.
13. Evans, J. R., and H. Poorter. 2001. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell and Environment 24: 755-767.
14. Falster, D., and M. Westoby. 2003. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 337-343.
15. Farquhar, G. D., S. von Caemmerer, and J. A. Berry. 2001. Models of photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 125: 42-45.
16. Farrior, C. E., R. Dybzinski, S. A. Levin, and S. W. Pacala. 2013. Competition for water and light in closed-canopy forests: a tractable model of carbon allocation with implications for carbon sinks. American Naturalist 181: 314-330.
17. Frank, D. A., A. W. Pontes, E. M. Maine, J. Caruana, R. Raina, S. Raina, and J. D. Fridley. 2010. Grassland root communities: species distributions and how they are linked to aboveground abundance. Ecology 91: 3201-3209.
18. Gedroc, J. J., K. D. M. McConnaughay, and J. S. Coleman. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Functional Ecology 10: 44-50.
19. Geritz, S. A. H., E. Kisdi, G. Meszena, and J. A. J. Metz. 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evolutionary Ecology 12: 35-57.
20. Givnish, T. J. 1982. On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. American Naturalist 120: 353-381.
21. Gleeson, S. K., and D. Tilman. 1992. Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis. American Naturalist 139: 1322-1343.
22. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
23. Harpole, W. S., et al. 2011. Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecology Letters 14: 852-862.
24. Iwasa, Y., D. Cohen, and J. A. Leon. 1984. Tree height and crown shape, as results of competitive games. Journal of Theoretical Biology 112: 279-297.
25. Kaspari, M., M. N. Garcia, K. E. Harms, M. Santana, S. J. Wright, and J. B. Yavitt. 2008. Multiple nutrients limit litterfall and decomposition in a tropical forest. Ecology Letters 11: 35-43.
26. King, D. A. 1990. The adaptive significance of tree height. American Naturalist 135: 809-828.
27. Lamb, E. G., B. H. Shore, and J. F. Cahill. 2007. Water and nitrogen addition differentially impact plant competition in a native rough fescue grassland. Plant Ecology 192: 21-33.
28. Larcher, W. 2003. Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
29. Lloyd, J., and G. D. Farquhar. 1996. The CO2 dependence of photosynthesis, plant growth responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations and their interaction with soil nutrient status. I. General principles and forest ecosystems. Functional Ecology 10: 4-32.
30. Luo, Y., et al. 2004. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. BioScience 54: 731-739.
31. Maina, G. G., J. S. Brown, and M. Gersani. 2002. Intra-plant versus inter-plant root competition in beans: avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commons. Plant Ecology 160: 235-247.
32. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
33. Maynard Smith, J., and G. R. Price. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246: 15-18.
34. McNickle, G. G., and R. Dybzinski. 2013. Game theory and plant ecology. Ecology Letters 16: 545-555.
35. Montgomery, R. A., P. B. Reich, and B. J. Palik. 2010. Untangling positive and negative biotic interactions: views from above and below ground in a forest ecosystem. Ecology 91: 3641-55.
36. Oren, R., et al. 2001. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411: 469-472.
37. Postel, S. P., G. C. Daily, and P. R. Ehrlich. 1996. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271: 785-788.
38. R Development Core Team. 2009. R 2.9.2. R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.r-project.org
39. Raynaud, X., and P. W. Leadley. 2004. Soil characteristics play a key role in modeling nutrient competition in plant communities. Ecology 85: 2200-2214.
40. Reich, P. B., S. E. Hobbie, T. Lee, D. S. Ellsworth, J. B. West, D. Tilman, J. M. H. Knops, S. Naeem, and J. Trost. 2006. Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature 440: 922-925.
41. Rubio, G., J. Zhu, and J. P. Lynch. 2003. A critical test of the two prevailing theories of plant response to nutrient availability. American Journal of Botany 90: 143-152.
42. SAS Institute. 2012. JMP version 10. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
43. Schimel, D. S., B. H. Braswell, R. McKeown, D. S. Ojima, W. J. Parton, and W. Pulliam. 1996. Climate and nitrogen controls on the geography and timescales of terrestrial biogeochemical cycling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10: 677-692.
44. Semchenko, M., K. Zobel, and M. J. Hutchings. 2010. To compete or not to compete: an experimental study of interactions between plant species with contrasting root behaviour. Evolutionary Ecology 24: 1433-1445.
45. Sinclair, T. R. 1992. Mineral nutrition and plant growth response to climate change. Journal of Experimental Botany 43: 1141-1146.
46. Slatyer, R. O. 1967. Plant-water relationships. Academic Press, London, UK.
47. Tilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
48. Tilman, D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
49. van der Ploeg, R. R., W. Bohm, and M. B. Kirkham. 1999. On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 1055-1062.
50. Vitousek, P. M., J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. A. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, and D. G. Tilman. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7: 737-750.
51. Wilson, S. D., and D. Tilman. 1991. Component of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availability. Ecology 72: 1050-1065.
52. Wright, I. J., P. B. Reich, and M. Westoby. 2003. Least-cost input mixtures of water and nitrogen for photosynthesis. American Naturalist 161: 98-111.