The Cochrane Library review titles that are important to users of health care, a Cochrane Consumer Network project

Health Expectations

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Wale, Janet L ^a   Belizán, María ^b   Nadel, Jane ^c   Jeffrey, Claire ^b   Vij, Sita L ^d  

^a Cochrane Consumer Network ^*  (Australia)

^b NONE   (South Africa)

^c NONE   (United States)

^d NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consumers in research; Health consumer networking; Lifestyle and non medical interventions; Prioritization of synthesized evidence topics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMERS IN RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CONSUMER NETWORKING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIFESTYLE AND NON-MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS; LITERATURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITIZATION OF SYNTHESIZED EVIDENCE TOPICS; STANDARD;

CONSUMERS IN RESEARCH; HEALTH CONSUMER NETWORKING; LIFESTYLE AND NON-MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS; PRIORITIZATION OF SYNTHESIZED EVIDENCE TOPICS;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84887904108     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00723.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. The Cochrane Library. Available at http://www.thecochranelibrary.com; plain language summaries and abstracts at http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews
2. Bauman AE, Fardy HJ, Harris PG. Getting it right: why bother with patient-centred care?The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003; 179: 253-256.
3. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet, 2009; 374: 86-89.
4. Wale JL, Colombo C, Belizan M, Nadel J. International health consumers in the Cochrane Collaboration: 15 years on. The Journal of Ambulatory Care, 2010; 33: 182-189.
5. Williamson C. What does involving consumers in research mean [Editorial]. The Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 2001; 94: 661-664.
6. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. London: Department of Health, 2001.
7. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 2002; 61: 213-236.
8. Owens C, Levy A, Aitken P. Do different stakeholder groups share mental research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 418-431.
9. Black N, Jenkinson C. Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes [Analysis]. BMJ, 2009; 339: b2495.
10. Partridge N, Scadding J. The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet, 2004; 364: 1923-1924.
11. James Lind Alliance. Available at http://www.lindalliance.org/tackling_treatment_uncertainties_together.asp; database of uncertainties of the effects of treatments (DUETs) at http://www.library.nhs.uk/duets/ (last accessed August 2010).
12. Yen L, Gillespie J, Jeon Y-H et al. Health professionals, patients and chronic illness policy: a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 2011; 14: 10-20.
13. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet, 2000; 355: 2037-2040.
14. Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 352-359.
15. Sakala C, Gyte G, Henderson S, Neilson JP, Horey D. Consumer-professional partnership to improve research: the experience of the Cochrane Collaboration's pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Birth, 2001; 28: 133-137.
16. Dickersin K, Braun L, Mead M et al. Development and implementation of a science training course for breast cancer activists: project LEAD (leadership, education and advocacy development). Health Expectations, 2001; 4: 213-220.
17. Belizán JM, Belizán M, Mazzoni A et al. Maternal and child health research focusing on interventions that involve consumer participation. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2010; 108: 154-155.
18. Kelson M. Consumer collaboration, patient-defined outcomes and the preparation of Cochrane reviews. Health Expectations, 1999; 2: 129-135.
19. Wee B, Hadley G, Derry S. How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviewsBMC Palliative Care, 2008; 7: 13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2532992/ .
20. Glenton C, Santesso N, Rosenbaum S et al. Presenting the results of Cochrane systematic reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative study. Medical Decision Making, 2010; 30: 566-577.