Ten years of progress - Improved hysterectomy outcomes in Finland 1996-2006: A longitudinal observation study

BMJ Open

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Mäkinen, Juha ^a   Brummer, Tea ^b   Jalkanen, Jyrki ^c   Heikkinen, Anna Mari ^d   Fraser, Jaana ^e   Tomás, Eija ^f   Härkki, Päivi ^b   Sjöberg, Jari ^b  

^a TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c JYVÄSKYLÄ CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^e Joensuu Central Hospital   (Finland)

^f TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEFUROXIME; METRONIDAZOLE;

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; BLADDER INJURY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; ORGAN INJURY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL INFECTION; THROMBOSIS PREVENTION; URETER INJURY; URINE RETENTION; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 84887881576     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003169     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Reich H, DiCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213-16. (Pubitemid 19240025)
2. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG 2009;116:492-500.
3. David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, et al. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Hum Reprod 2007;22:260-5. (Pubitemid 44942694)
4. Hansen CT, Møller C, Daugbjerg J, et al. Establishment of a national Danish hysterectomy database: preliminary report on the first 13 425 hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:546-57.
5. Wu M, Huang K, Long C, et al. Trends in various types of hysterectomy and distribution by patient age, surgeon age, and hospital accreditation: 10-year population-based study in Taiwan. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:612-19.
6. Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J, et al. FINHYST 2006 - National prospective 1-year survey of 5 279 hysterectomies. Hum Reprod 2009;24:2515-22.
7. Maresh MJA, Metcalfe MA, Mc Pherson K, et al. The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery. BJOG 2002;109:302-12. (Pubitemid 37329305)
8. Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1473-8.
9. Chapron C, Laforest L, Ansquer Y, et al. Hysterectomy techniques used for benign pathologies: results of a French multicentre study. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2464-70. (Pubitemid 29473912)
10. Farquhar C, Steiner C. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:229-43.
11. Møller C, Kehlet H, Utzon J, et al. Hysterectomy in Denmark. An analysis of postoperative hospitalisation, morbidity and readmission. Dan Med Bull 2002;49:353-7 (in Danish).
12. Oma J.Which factors affect the choice of method for hysterectomy in benign disease. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004;124:92-4 (in Norwegian).
13. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:34-6.
14. Kolkman W, Trimbos-Kemper T, Jansen F. Operative laparoscopy in the Netherlands: diffusion and acceptance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;130:245-8. (Pubitemid 46097234)
15. Persson P, Hellborg T, Brynhildsen J, et al. Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy - a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:267-74.
16. Hill E, Graham M, Shelley J. Hysterectomy trends in Australia - between 2000/01 and 2004/05. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:153-8.
17. Stang A, Merrill RM, Kuss O. Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:125-33.
18. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 2004;328:129-36.
19. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al . Methods of hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005;330:1478-86.
20. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(2):CD003677.
21. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD003677.
22. Claerhout F, Deprest J. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. In: ThakarRManyondaI.eds Best practice and research clinical obstetrics and gynaecology, hysterectomy. Elsevier, 2005;19:357-75.
23. Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the root of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:18-23.
24. Brummer TH, Seppälä T, Härkki P. National learning curve of laparoscopic hysterectomy and trends in hysterectomy in Finland 2000-2005. Hum Reprod 2008;23:840-5. (Pubitemid 351651194)
25. GKS. The society of gynaecological surgery in Finland, webpage, in Finnish. Suositukset 2007 (recommendations). http://www.terveysportti.fi/ kotisivut/sivut.koti?p-sivusto=434 (accessed on July 2012) (in Finnish).
26. Löfgren M, Poromaa IS, Stjerndahl JH, et al. Postoperative infections and antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy in Sweden: a study by the Swedish National Register for Gynecologic Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:1202-7.
27. Roberts TE, Tsourapas A, Middleton LJ, et al. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2011;342:2202.
28. Qvistad E, Langebrekke A. Should we recommend hysterectomy more often to premenopausal and climacteric women? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:811-14.